Michael J. Brzozowski
Thomas Sandholm
ABSTRACT
Increasingly, large organizations are experimenting with internal social media (e.g., blogs, forums) as a platform for widespread distributed collaboration. Contributions to their counterparts outside the organization's firewall are driven by attention from strangers, in addition to sharing among friends. However, employees in a workplace under time pressures may be reluctant to participate and the audience for their contributions is comparatively smaller. Participation rates also vary widely from group to group. So what influences people to contribute in this environment?
In this paper, we present the results of a year-long empirical study of internal social media participation at a large technology company, and analyze the impact attention, feedback, and managers' and coworkers' participation have on employees' behavior. We find feedback in the form of posted comments is highly correlated with a user's subsequent participation. Recent manager and coworker activity relate to users initiating or resuming participation in social media. These findings extend, to an aggregate level, the results from prior interviews about blogging at the company and offer design and policy implications for organizations seeking to encourage social media adoption.
- A. Anagnostopoulos, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Influence and correlation in social networks. In KDD '08: Proc. of the 14th ACM int'l conf. on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 7--15, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- J. Arguello, B. S. Butler, E. Joyce, R. Kraut, K. S. Ling, C. Rosé, and X. Wang. Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities. In CHI '06: Proc. of the ACM conf. on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 959--968, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Beenen, K. Ling, X. Wang, K. Chang, D. Frankowski, P. Resnick, and R. E. Kraut. Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. In CSCW '04: Proc. of the ACM conf. on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 212--221, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Benkler. Coase's penguin, or linux and the nature of the firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112:369--446, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Box and D. R. Cox. An analysis of transformations. J. of the Royal Statistical Society, B(26):211--252, 1964.Google Scholar
- Y. Bramoulle, H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin. Identification of peer effects through social networks. Technical report, University of Laval, 2006.Google Scholar
- M. Burke and R. Kraut. Mind your ps and qs: the impact of politeness and rudeness in online communities. In CSCW '08: Proc. of the ACM conf. on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 281--284, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Butler, L. Sproull, S. Kiesler, and R. Kraut. Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why? In S. Weisband and L. Atwater, editors, Leadership at a Distance. Erlbaum, 2002.Google Scholar
- P. R. Cohen. Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Collett. Modelling Binary Data. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2nd edition, 2003.Google Scholar
- D. Crandall, D. Cosley, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and S. Suri. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In KDD '08: Proc. of the 14th ACM int'l conf. on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 160--168, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. H. Davenport and J. C. Beck. The attention economy. Ubiquity, 2(14):1, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. DiMicco, D. R. Millen, W. Geyer, C. Dugan, B. Brownholtz, and M. Muller. Motivations for social networking at work. In CSCW '08: Proc. of the ACM conf. on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 711--720, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Efimova and J. Grudin. Crossing boundaries: A case study of employee blogging. In HICSS '07: Proc. of the 40th Annual Hawaii int'l conf. on System Sciences, page 86, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Farrell, T. Lau, S. Nusser, E. Wilcox, and M. Muller. Socially augmenting employee profiles with people-tagging. In UIST '07: Proc. of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 91--100, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Grudin. Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers. Commun.ACM, 37(1):92--105, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. J. Hinds and J. Pfeffer. Why organizations don't "know what they know": Cognitive and motivational factors affecting the transfer of expertise. In M. S. Ackerman, V. Pipek, and V. Wulf, editors, Sharing Expertise: Beyond Knowledge Management, pages 3--26. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.Google Scholar
- B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, and F. Wu. Crowdsourcing, attention and productivity. CoRR, abs/0809.3030, 2008.Google Scholar
- B. A. Huberman, D. M. Romero, and F. Wu. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14(1), January 2009.Google Scholar
- J. Huh, L. Jones, T. Erickson, W. A. Kellogg, R. K. E. Bellamy, and J. C. Thomas. Blogcentral: the role of internal blogs at work. In CHI'07: extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 2447--2452, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Jackson, J. Yates, and W. Orlikowski. Corporate blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk. In HICSS '07: Proc. of the 40th Annual Hawaii int'l conf. on System Sciences, page 80, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Kolari, T. Finin, Y. Yesha, Y. Yesha, K. Lyons, S. Perelgut, and J. Hawkins. On the Structure, Properties and Utility of Internal Corporate Blogs. In Proc. of the int'l conf. on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2007), March 2007.Google Scholar
- R. E. Kraut, S. R. Fussel, S. E. Brennan, and J. Siegel. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds and S. Kiesler, editors, Distributed Work, pages 137--162. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. R. Lakhani and E. von Hippel. How open source software works: "free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32(6):923 -- 943, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Lampe and E. Johnston. Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In GROUP '05: Proc. of the int'l ACM conf. on supporting group work, pages 11--20, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. F. Manski. Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60:531--542, 1993.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. R. Millen, J. Feinberg, and B. Kerr. Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise. In CHI '06: Proc. of the ACM conf. on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 111--120, New York, NY, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. S. Milton and J. C. Arnold. Introduction to Probability Theory and Statistics. McGraw Hill, 2003.Google Scholar
- P. Resnick, K. Kuwabara, R. Zeckhauser, and E. Friedman. Reputation systems. Commun. ACM, 43(12):45--48, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. A. Simon. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger, editor, Computers, communications, and the public interest, pages 37--72. Johns Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar
- C. Steglich and T. A. Snijders. Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Technical report, Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology, University of Groningen, 2007.Google Scholar
- Y. Wang and D. R. Fesenmaier. Assessing Motivation of Contribution in Online Communities: An Empirical Investigation of an Online Travel Community. Electronic Markets, 13:33--45, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. W. S. Wei. Time Series Analysis, Univariate and Multivariate Methods. Pearson Addison Wesley, 2006.Google Scholar
- D. M. Wilkinson. Strong regularities in online peer production. In EC'08: Proc. of the 9th ACM conf. on Electronic commerce, pages 302--309, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Wu and B. A. Huberman. How public opinion forms. In Proc. WINE, volume 5385 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 334--341. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Yardi, S. Golder, and M. Brzozowski. The pulse of the corporate blogosphere. In Conf. Supplement of CSCW 2008. ACM, November 8-12 2008.Google Scholar
- S. Yardi, S. A. Golder, and M. J. Brzozowski. Blogging at work and the corporate attention economy. In Proc. CHI 2009. ACM, to appear April 4-9 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Effects of feedback and peer pressure on contributions to enterprise social media
Recommendations
Social media and online political participation
Blog use and SNS use are positively related to online political participation.Like-minded exposure mediates the relationship between blog use and political participation.Cross-cutting exposure mediates the relationship between SNS use and political ...
Leveraging social media to gather user feedback for software development
Web2SE '11: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Web 2.0 for Software EngineeringSocial media is impacting the way service offerings are deployed and delivered. Several social media service offerings have emerged in the past few years (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn). At the same time, more traditional kinds of service offerings ...
Social Media Effectiveness for Public Engagement: Example of Small Nonprofits
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSocial media sites are increasingly adopted by small nonprofit organizations (NPOs) to help them meet their public engagement goals. However, several characteristics of small organizations make it hard for them to effectively use social media sites. We ...
Comments