skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

What determines IT spending priorities?

Published:01 August 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Introduction

Global spending on Information Technology (IT) continues to grow and is expected to reach $1.66 trillion in 2009. In addition, IT represents a large (40--45%) and stable share (in nominal dollars) of firm spending on equipment and software. As CIOs and IT managers attempt to budget these large IT expenditures they must help the business align IT spending with business strategy and prioritize IT investments in conjunction with business goals. When prioritizing IT spending managers often compare their own IT spending priorities with those of other firms. That is,

"Every year, CIOs and their finance people get prepared for the following question from their CEOs: "How does our IT spending compare with our competitors?"

In an effort to help firms benchmark their IT spending priorities, we surveyed 1,495 business leaders in Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, and Texas during the 4th Quarter of 2005 to examine the firms' IT spending priorities across business functions (such as, administration; production and distribution; customer relationship management; research and design; managerial decision-making; and security) and the impact of firm and industry characteristics on these priorities. While previous studies examine IT spending from different perspectives, we are not aware of any work that examines the factors that determine how firms allocate IT expenditures across business functions.

Empirical analysis of this survey data shows that the highest IT spending priorities of the respondents are in the areas of administration and production and distribution while the lowest priorities are in the areas of research and development (R&D) and security. In addition, the analysis shows that factors such as industry type, firm size, and perceptions of the impact of past IT investments on product quality and revenue may differentially affect the allocation of IT expenditures across business function categories. For example, the results show that:

• Service firms are more likely to rank IT spending in support of R&D and security as their highest priority.

• Small firms are more likely to rank IT spending in support of security as their lowest priority.

• Firms that have leveraged past IT expenditures to increase product/service quality are more likely to rank customer relationship management (CRM) as their highest IT priority.

• Firms that have leveraged past IT expenditures to increase revenues are more likely to rank managerial decision-making as their highest IT priority.

References

  1. Allen, P. Is it safe? Wall Street and Technology, (July 2005), 30--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartels, A. Global IT Market Outlook: 2009. Forrester Research, Inc.; http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,46676,00.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartels, A. U.S. IT spending benchmarks for 2006. Forrester Research, Inc.; http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,40453,00.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Commerce. Digital Economy 2003. Economic and Statistics Administration; https://www.esa.doc.gov/reports/DE-Intro.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kibiloski, M. How to finance IT and handle change. Financial Executive 23, 2 (Mar. 2007), 58--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nelson, P., Richmond, W. and Seidmann, A. Two dimensions of software acquisition. Comm. ACM 39, 7 (July 1996), 29--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Pettey, C. Gartner Consulting's Worldwide IT Benchmark Group says small and midsized businesses spend up to 60 percent of their IT budget on infrastructure. Gartner Press Releases, (July 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Reilly, K. AMR Research finds spending on Sarbanes-Oxley compliance will remain steady at $6.0B in 2007. AMR Research; http://www.amrresearch.com/Content/View.asp?pmillid=20232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Thatcher, M. and Oliver, J. The impact of technology investments on a firm's production efficiency, product quality, and productivity. J. MIS 18, 2 (Fall 2001), 17--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Thatcher, M and Pingry, D. Modeling the 'IT value paradox.' Comm. of the ACM 50, 8, (Aug. 2007), 41--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Thatcher, M. and Pingry, D. An economic model of product quality and IT value. Information Systems Research 15, 3 (Sept. 2004a), 268--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Thatcher, M. and Pingry, D. Understanding the business value of IT investments: Theoretical evidence from alternative market and cost structures. J. MIS 21, 2 (Fall 2004b), 61--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. What determines IT spending priorities?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Communications of the ACM
          Communications of the ACM  Volume 52, Issue 8
          A Blind Person's Interaction with Technology
          August 2009
          132 pages
          ISSN:0001-0782
          EISSN:1557-7317
          DOI:10.1145/1536616
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 August 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Popular
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format