skip to main content
10.1145/153850.153863acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Negation and minimality in non-horn databases

Published:01 August 1993Publication History

ABSTRACT

Two main approaches have been followed in the literature to give a semantics to non-Horn databases. The first one is based on considering the set of rules composing the programs as inference rules and interpreting the negation in the body as failure to prove. The other approach is based on the so-called closed-world assumption and its objective is to define a stronger notion of consequence from a theory than the classical one, where, very roughly, negative information can be inferred whenever its positive counterpart cannot be deduced from the theory. In this work we generalize the semantics for negation in logic programs, putting together the constructive nature of the rule-based deductive databases with the syntax-independence of the closed-world reasoning rules. These generalized semantics are shown to be a well-motivated and well-founded alternative to closed-world assumptions since they enjoy nice semantic and computational properties.

References

  1. ABW88.K. R. Apt, H. A. Blair, and A. Walker. Towards a theory of declarative knowledge. In J. Minker, editor, Foundation of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming, pages 89- 142. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. BED92.R. Ben-Eliyahu and R. Dechter. Propositional semantics for disjunctive logic programs. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference and Symposium on Logic Programming (IJCSLP-9P), pages 379-385, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BH86.N. Bidoit and R. Hull. Positivism versus minimalism in deductive databases. In Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Principle Of Database Systems (PODS-86), pages 123- 132, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. CL90.M. Cadoli and M. Lenzerini. The complexity of closed world reasoning and circumscription. In Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI- 90), pages 550-555. MIT press, July 1990. Extended version as Technical Report RAP. 17.91, Universit~ di Roma "La Sapienzg', Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, 1991. To appear in Journal of Computer and System Sciences. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. CS92.M. Cadoli and M. Schaerf. A survey on complexity results for non-monotonic logics. Submitted for publication, June 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. EG91.T. Eiter and G. Gottlob. Propositional circumscription and extended closed world reasoning are II#-complete. Technical Report CD-TR 91/20, Technische Universit#it Wien, Vienna Austria, Christian Doppler Labor fiir Expertensysteme, May 1991. To appear in Theoretical Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. EG92.T. Eiter and G. Gottlob. Complexity resuits for disjunctive logic programming and application to nonmonotoninc logics. Technical Report CD-TR 92/41, Technische Universit#it Wien, Vienna Austria, Christian Doppler Labor fiir Expertensysteme, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. EG93.T. Eiter and G. Gottlob. Complexity aspects of various semantics for disjunctive databases. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Principle Of Database Systems (PODS-93), 1993. in press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. GL88.M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. The stable model semantics for logic programming. In Proceedings of #he Fifth Logic Programming Symposium, pages 1070-1080. MIT Press, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. GL91.M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. Classical negation in logic programs and disjunctive databases. New Generation Computing, 9:365-385, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. GPP89.M. Gelfond, H. Przymusinska, and T. Przymusinsky. On the relationship between circumscription and negation as failure. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 38:49-73, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. KN88.R. Krishnamurthy and S. A. Naqvi. Nondeterministic choice in datalog. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Data and Knowledge Bases, pages 416-424. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Min82.J. Minker. On indefinite databases and the closed world assumption. In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE-82), pages 292-308, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. MT91a.W. Marek and M. Truszczyfiski. Autoepistemic logic. Journal of the A CM, 38(3):588- 619, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. MT91b.W. Marek and M. Truszczyfiski. Computing intersection of autoepistemic expansions. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Logic Programming and Non Monotonic Reasoning, pages 37-50. The MIT press, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Prz88.T. Przymusinski. On the declarative semantics of stratified deductive databases and logic programs. In J. Minker, editor, Foundation of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming, pages 193-216. Morgan Kaufmann, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Prz91a.T. Przymusinski. Semantics of disjunctive logic programs and deductive databases. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Deductive and Object-Oriented Databases (DOOD-91), pages 85-107, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Prz91b.T. Przymusinski. Stable semantics for disjunctive programs. New Generation Computing, 9:401-424, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. PY92.C. It. Papadimitriou and M. Yannakakis. Tie-breaking semantics and structural totality. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Principle Of Database Systems (PODS-92), pages 16-22, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rei78.R. Reiter. On closed world data bases. In H. Gallaire and J. Minker, editors, Logic and Data Bases, pages 119-140. Plenum, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. RLM89.A. Rajasekar, J. Lobo, and J. Minker. Weak generalized closed world assumption. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 5:293-307, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sch92.M. Schaerf. Logic programming and autoepistemic logics" new relations and complexity results, submitted, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Sto76.L.J. Stockmeyer. The polynomial-time hierarchy. Theoretical Computer Science, 3:1-22, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. SZ90.D. Sacch and C. Zaniolo. Stable models and non-determinism in logic programs with negation. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Principle Of Database Systems (PODS-90), pages 205-217, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. vEK76.M. H. van Emden and R. A. Kowalski. The semantics of predicate logic as a programming language. Journal of the A CM, 23(4):733-742, 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. vGRS91.A. van Gelder, K. A. Ross, and J. S. Sehlipf. The well-founded semantics for general logic programs. Journal of the A CM, 38:620-650, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. YH85.A. Yahya and L. J. Henschen. Deduction in non-horn databases, journal of Automated Reasoning, 1:141-160, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Negation and minimality in non-horn databases

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            PODS '93: Proceedings of the twelfth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems
            August 1993
            312 pages
            ISBN:0897915933
            DOI:10.1145/153850

            Copyright © 1993 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 August 1993

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            PODS '93 Paper Acceptance Rate26of115submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate642of2,707submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader