skip to main content
10.1145/1541948.1541988acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespersuasiveConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Can ambient persuasive technology persuade unconsciously?: using subliminal feedback to influence energy consumption ratings of household appliances

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we explore a fundamental characteristic of Ambient Persuasive Technology: Can it persuade the user without receiving the user's conscious attention? In a task consisting of 90 trials, participants had to indicate which of three household appliances uses the lowest average amount of energy. After each choice, participants in the supraliminal feedback condition received feedback about the correctness of their choice through presentation of a smiling or a sad face for 150 ms. Participants in the subliminal feedback condition received identical feedback, but the faces were presented only for 25 ms, which prohibited conscious perception of these stimuli. The final third of the participants received no feedback. In the next task, participants rated the energy consumption of all presented appliances. Results indicated that supraliminal feedback and subliminal feedback both led to more correct energy consumption ratings as compared to receiving no feedback. Implications are discussed.

References

  1. B. J. Fogg. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. E. Arroyo, L. Bonanni, and T. Selker. Waterbot: Exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005), pages 631--639, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Riva, G., Vatalaro, F., Davide, F., Alcaniz, M. (eds.) Ambient Intelligence. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Wisneski, C., Ishii, H., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M. G., Brave, S., Ullmer, B., Yarin, P.: Ambient Displays. In: Streitz, N. A., Konomi, S., Burkhardt, H.-J. (eds.) CoBuild 1998. LNCS, vol. 1370. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Schmidt, A.: Interactive Context-Aware Systems Interacting with Ambient Intelligence. In: Riva, G., Vatalaro, F., Davide, F., Alcaniz, M. (eds.) Ambient Intelligence. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mathew, A. P.: Using the environment as an interactive interface to motivate positive behavior change in a subway station. In CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1637--1640, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Obermair, C., Reitenberger, W., Meschtscherjakov, A., Lankes, M., & Tscheligi, M.: perFrames: Persuasive picture frames for proper posture. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H. et al., (Eds). Persuasive 2008, LNCS, vol. 5033, pages 128--139, Springer, Heidelberg (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Davis, J.: Towards participatory design of ambient persuasive technology. Presented at Persuasive Pervasive Technology and Environmental Sustainability, Workshop at the Sixth International Conference on Pervasive Computing (Pervasive 2008), Sydney, May 19--22, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Grolleman, J., van Dijk, B., Nijholt, A., van Emst, A.: Break the Habit! Designing an e-Therapy Intervention Using a Virtual Coach in Aid of Smoking Cessation. In: IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 133--141. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Creed, C.: Using Computational Agents to Motivate Diet Change. In: IJsselsteijn, W., de Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 100--103. Springer, Heidelberg (2006) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253--285). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., & Smith, P. K. (2005). The power of the subliminal: Subliminal perception and possible applications. In R. Hassin, J. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconsciousness (pp. 77--106). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 556--568.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hsu, S-M., Hetrick, W. P., & Pessoa L.: Depth of facial expression processing depends on stimulus visibility: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence of priming effects. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 2008, Sep, 8, 282--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. 1993. Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposure. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64, 723--739.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Niedenthal, P. M. 1990. Implicit perception of affective information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 505--527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ric, F. 2004. Effects of the activation of affective information on stereotyping: When sadness increases stereotype use. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1310--1321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Karremans, J. C., Stroebe, W., & Claus, J. 2006. Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 42, 792--798.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Brehm, J. W. 1966. A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Krosnick, J. A., Betz, A. L., Jussim, L. J., & Lynn, A. R. 1992. Subliminal conditioning of attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 152--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Hassin, R. R. (2008). Being open minded without knowing why: Evidence from nonconscious goal pursuit. Social Cognition, 26, 578--592.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Midden, C., & Ham, J. 2008. The persuasive effects of positive and negative social feedback from an embodied agent on energy conservation behavior. Paper presented at AISB 2008, Aberdeen, Scotland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Fishbach, A., Friedman, R. S., & Kruglanski, A. W. 2003. Leading us not onto temptation: Momentary allurement elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296--309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. 2002. Priming against your will: How accessible alternatives a Vect goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 368--383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Vossen, S., Ham, J. R. C., & Midden, C. J. H. 2009. Social influence of a persuasive agent: The role of agent embodiment and evaluative feedback. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Midden, C. J. H., & Ham, J. R. C. 2009. Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Can ambient persuasive technology persuade unconsciously?: using subliminal feedback to influence energy consumption ratings of household appliances

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          Persuasive '09: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology
          April 2009
          279 pages
          ISBN:9781605583761
          DOI:10.1145/1541948

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 April 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Persuasive '09 Paper Acceptance Rate21of66submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate32of137submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader