skip to main content
10.1145/1542084.1542107acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroitvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards context-aware multimedia processing through semantic web services

Published:03 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The increasing availability of distributed digital TV and multimedia (MM) resources - content and Web services - on the Web, raises the need to automatically retrieve and process resources to satisfy a given context. In order to fulfill a particular content need, usually a set of operations, realised through Web services, have to be orchestrated to retrieve and process, e.g. scale or transcode, MM content out of distributed repositories. However, the heterogeneities between concurrent MM metadata schemas and vocabularies raise issues with respect to interoperability. To overcome these issues, we propose the derivation of so-called Situation-driven Processes (SDP) for the digital TV domain. SDP are supported through a dedicated ontology, being aligned to the SWS reference ontology WSMO, and provide a means to semantically describe context-driven Web service orchestrations as being required for context-aware MM resource retrieval. Providing a specific SDP derivation for MM consumption contexts - being aligned to concurrent MM and TV metadata schemas and vocabularies - supports the automatic discovery of MM and TV resources while supporting interoperability across distinct MM and TV content repositories.

References

  1. Bailer, W., Schallauer, P., The Detailed Audiovisual Profile: Enabling Interoperability between MPEG-7 based Systems, Proceedings of International MultiMedia Modelling Conference (MMM 2006), IEEE Press, Beijing, CN, Jan. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cabral, L., Domingue, J., Galizia, S., Gugliotta, A., Norton, B., Tanasescu, V., Pedrinaci, C. (2006): IRS-III: A Broker for Semantic Web Services based Applications. In proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2006), Athens, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dietze, S., Gugliotta, A., Domingue, J., (2007) A Semantic Web Services-based Infrastructure for Context-Adaptive Process Support. IEEE 2007 International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), Salt Lake City, USA, July 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dietze, S., Gugliotta, A., and Domingue, J. (2008) Situation-Driven Processes for Semantic Web Services, 5th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM'08), Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dietze, S., Gugliotta, A., Domingue, J., (2008) Conceptual Situation Spaces for Situation-Driven Processes. 5th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), Tenerife, Spain, June 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dublin Core Metadata Initiative (2006). Dublin Core Metadata Terms. http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fensel, D., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., de Bruijn, J., Stollberg, M., Roman, D., Domingue, J. (2006): Enabling Semantic Web Services - The Web service Modelling Ontology, Springer 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hunter, J. Adding Multimedia to the Semantic Web - Building an MPEG-7 Ontology (2001), In International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS, 2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Moving Picture Experts Group, ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 - MPEG-7, http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/standards/mpeg-7/mpeg-7.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nack, F., van Ossenbruggen, J. & Hardman, L. (2005) That Obscure Object of Desire: Multimedia Metadata on the Web (Part II). IEEE MultiMedia, Vol 12, No. 1, pp.54 -- 63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Nahrstedt, K., Balke, W.-T. (2004) A Taxonomy for Multimedia Service Composition. ACM Multimedia Conference, New York, USA, ACM, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. OWL-S 1.0. http://www.daml.org/services/owl-s/1.0/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Petridis, K., Bloehdorn, S., Saathoff, C., Simou, N., Dasiopoulou, S., Tzouvaras, V., Handschuh, S., Avrithis, Y., Kompatsiaris, I., Staab, S. (2006). Knowledge Representation and Semantic Annotation of Multimedia Content, IEE Proceedings on Vision Image and Signal Processing, Special issue on Knowledge-Based Digital Media Processing, Vol. 153, No. 3, pp. 255--262, June 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Troncy, R., Bailer, W., Hausenblas, M., Hofmair, P., Schlatte, R. Enabling Multimedia Metadata Interoperability by Defining Formal Semantics of MPEG-7 Profiles. In: 1st International Conference on Semantics And digital Media Technology (SAMT 06), Athens, Greece. December 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Tsinaraki C., Polydoros P., Kazasis F., Christodoulakis S., Ontology-based Semantic Indexing for MPEG-7 and TV-Anytime Audiovisual Content, Special issue of Multimedia Tools and Application Journal on Video Segmentation for Semantic Annotation and Transcoding, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. van Ossenbruggen, J., Nack, F. & Hardman, L. (2004) That Obscure Object of Desire: Multimedia Metadata on the Web (Part I). IEEE MultiMedia, Vol 11, No. 4, pp.38--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wagner, M., Kellerer, W. 2004. Web services selection for distributed composition of multimedia content, Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia, October 10-16, 2004, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Weißenberg, N., Gartmann, R., and Voisard, A. (2006), An Ontology-Based Approach to Personalized Situation-Aware Mobile Service Supply. Geoinformatica 10, 1 (Mar. 2006), 55--90. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10707-005-4886-9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. W3C: Simple Object Access Protocol, SOAP, Version 1.2 Part 0: Primer, (2003). (http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part0/).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. W3C: Universal Description, Discovery and Integration: UDDI Spec Technical Committee Specification v. 3.0, (2003). http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.0.1-20031014.htm).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. W3C: WSDL: Web services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1, (2001). (http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. WSMO Working Group (2004), D2v1.0: Web service Modeling Ontology (WSMO). Working Draft, (2004). (http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d2/v1.0/).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. WSMX Working Group (2007), The Web Service Modelling eXecution environment, http://www.wsmx.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards context-aware multimedia processing through semantic web services

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video
            June 2009
            240 pages
            ISBN:9781605583402
            DOI:10.1145/1542084

            Copyright © 2009 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 3 June 2009

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate52of149submissions,35%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader