skip to main content
10.1145/1542084.1542114acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroitvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interactive television format development - could participatory design bridge the gap?

Published:03 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents the results of an exploratory study, part of my Ph.D., focusing on 'viewer empowerment' in the audiovisual industry due to digitization and the emerging 'architecture of participation' [1] of Web2.0. In the 'traditional' broadcasting industry there are boundaries between the media professional and the non-professional (the audience) [2]. Web2.0 offers citizens/consumers the opportunity to create, distribute, share and publish all sorts of content (text, images, video, audio) via the internet. These changes in media consumption practices have consequences for the broadcasting industry and poses the question whether the traditional broadcasting industry is willing to adjust to this changing role of the viewer and open up to (inter)active non-professionals. The conclusion described, results from two preliminary studies that were meant to gain insight in a) ideas amongst internet and broadcasting specialists regarding viewer empowerment in interactive television formats and development and b) the current internet and interactive television usage in the greater Noord-Holland region. The studies indicate that internet and broadcasting professionals differ in the way they value end-user participation. However they have rather traditional ideas about making television. The different generations of end-users (e.g. 'digital natives', the younger people) have different needs; the audience changes. The use of participatory design could be an instrument for the broadcasting industry to bridge the gap.

References

  1. O'Reilly, T., What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. 9 March 2005 O'Reilly Media, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Couldry, N., The Place of Media Power. 2000, London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ehn, P. and M. Kyng, The collective resource approach to systems design., in Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge, G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, and M. Kyng, Editors. 1987, Gower: Brookfield VT USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Hermes, J. and S. Janssen, De nieuwe contentmakers, in Jaarboek ICT en samenleving 2006: De Digitale Generatie J.d. Haan and C.v.t. Hof, Editors. 2006, Boom Uitgeverij: Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Toffler, A., The third wave. 1980, New York: Bantam Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Leadbeater, C., We-Think: The Power of Mass Creativity. 2008, London: Profile Books LtdGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tunstall, J., Television Producers. 1993, Londen: Routledge. 235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Newcomb, H. and R. Alley, The Producer's Medium: Conversations With Creators of American TV. 1983, New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gans, H.J., Deciding What's News. 1980, New York: Vintage Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ytreberg, E., Premediations of performance in recent live television: a scripting approach to media production studies. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 2006. 9(4): p. 421--440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Enli, G.S., The Participatory Turn in Broadcast Television. Institutional, editorial and textual challenges and strategies, in Faculty of Humanities. 2007, University of Oslo: Oslo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karlsen, F., et al., Non-professional activitty on television in a time of digitalisation. More fun or the elite or new opportunities for ordinary people? Nordicom Review, forthcoming.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Pew Internet & American Life Project, Teen Content Creators and Consumers. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Syverten, T., Television and multi-platform media hybrids: Corporate strategies and regulatory dilemmas. In 17th Nordic Conference on Media and Communication Research. 2005: AalborgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Syvertsen, T., Public television and multi-platform media hybrids: Strategies for involving viewers and generating new revenue, in Media and Democracy. Experience from Europe, F. Marcinkowski, W.A. Meier, and J. Trappel, Editors. 2006, Haupt Verlag: Bern, Stuttgart, Wenen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ruskoff, D., Children of Chaos. 1997, Londen: Flamingo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Suchman, L., Foreword, in Participatory Design. Principles and Practices, D. Schuler and A. Namioka, Editors. 1993, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers: Hillsdale, New Jersey. p. viii.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Muller, M.J., Participatory design: The third space in HCI, in Handbook of HCI, J. Jacko and A. Sears, Editors. 2003, Erlbaum: Mahway NJ USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Keen, A., The Cult of the Amateur. How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy. 2007, London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Keen, A. and E. Bell (2007) Andrew Keen v Emily Bell. Is today's internet killing our culture? Take Two series. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/aug/10/andrewkeenvemilybellGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Schuler, D. and A. Namioka, eds. Participatory Design. Principles and Practices. 1993, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers: Hillsdale, New Jersey Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Patton, J.W. Picturing commutes: Informant photography and urban design. In PDC 2000. 2000. New York: CPRS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Noble, A. and C. Robinson, For the love of the people: Participatory design in a community context, in Proceeding of CoDesigning 2000. 2000, Springer: London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Interactive television format development - could participatory design bridge the gap?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video
      June 2009
      240 pages
      ISBN:9781605583402
      DOI:10.1145/1542084

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 June 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate52of149submissions,35%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader