skip to main content
10.1145/1542130.1542161acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Leveraging latent growth models to better understand MIS theory: a primer

Published:28 May 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this didactic study is to demonstrate how latent growth models (LGM) can be utilized to measure changes in student's computer self efficacy (CSE) over time. LGM is a special application of structural equation modeling (SEM), an analytic tool that is popular among MIS researchers. LGMs have been used to study longitudinal changes in observed and/or latent variables over time in several other fields such as psychology, sociology, and management. To promote its use within MIS research, this paper provides a primer on the application of LGM using CSE data gathered from freshmen enrolled in the introduction to MIS class. We illustrate unconditional and conditional LGMs, and highlight the types of research questions such models can address. We discuss issues related to data requirements, model identification, estimation methods, sample size requirements, and model fit assessment statistics for LGMs, and conclude by providing avenues of further longitudinal research in MIS that can benefit from the use of LGMs.

References

  1. Gefen, D. 2003. Assessing Unidimensionality Through LISREL: An Explanation and Example. CAIS. 12, 23--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Joreskog. 1970. A general method for analysis of covariance structures. Biometrika. 57(2), 239--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bollen, K.A., Structural Equations with Latent Variables. 1989, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis, F., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw. 1989. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science. 35(8), 982--1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. McKnight, H., V. Choudhury, and C. Kacmar. 2002. Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology. Information Systems Research. 13(3), 334--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bollen, K. and P. Curran, Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Perspective. 2006, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Compeau, D., C.A. Higgins, and S. Huff. 1999. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly. 23(2), 145--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Marakas, G., M. Yi, and R.D. Johnson. 1998. The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research. 9(2), 126--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Duncan, T., S. Duncan, and L. Strycker, An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling. 2006, New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Muthen, L. and B. Muthen. 2002. How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling. 9(4), 599--620.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Shah, R. and S.M. Goldstein. 2006. Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations Management. 24, 148--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Singer, J.D. and J.B. Willett, Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. 2003, New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenberger, R., S. Hutchison, and D. Sowa. 1986. Perceived Organizational Support. Journal of Applied Psychology. 71(3), 500--507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Stoolmiller, M. 1994. Antisocial behavior, delinquent peer association and unsupervised wandering for boys: Growth and change from childhood to early adolescence. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 29, 263--288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Chan, D. and N. Schmitt. 2000. Interindividual differences in intraindividual changes in proactivity during organizational entry: A latent growth modeling approach to understanding newcomer adaptation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85(2), 190--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis. 2000. A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Studies. Management Science. 46(2), 186--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Enders, C.K., Analyzing structural equation models with missing data, in A Second course in structural equation modeling, G.R. Hancock and R.O. Mueller, Editors. 2006, Information Age: Greenwich, CT. p. 313--344.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Leveraging latent growth models to better understand MIS theory: a primer

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMIS CPR '09: Proceedings of the special interest group on management information system's 47th annual conference on Computer personnel research
      May 2009
      242 pages
      ISBN:9781605584270
      DOI:10.1145/1542130

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 May 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader