skip to main content
research-article

On the convergence and stability of data-driven link estimation and routing in sensor networks

Published:24 July 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The wireless network community has become increasingly aware of the benefits of data-driven link estimation and routing as compared with beacon-based approaches, but the issue of Biased Link Sampling (BLS) estimation has not been well studied even though it affects routing convergence in the presence of network and environment dynamics. Focusing on traffic-induced dynamics, we examine the open, unexplored question of how serious the BLS issue is and how to effectively address it when the routing metric ETX is used. For a wide range of traffic patterns and network topologies and using both node-oriented and network-wide analysis and experimentation, we discover that the optimal routing structure remains quite stable even though the properties of individual links and routes vary significantly as traffic pattern changes. In cases where the optimal routing structure does change, data-driven link estimation and routing is either guaranteed to converge to the optimal structure or empirically shown to converge to a close-to-optimal structure. These findings provide the foundation for addressing the BLS issue in the presence of traffic-induced dynamics and suggest approaches other than existing ones. These findings also demonstrate that it is possible to maintain an optimal, stable routing structure despite the fact that the properties of individual links and paths vary in response to network dynamics.

References

  1. Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., Biswas, S., Judd, G., and Morris, R. 2004. Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Data Communications Festival. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chakeres, I. and Belding-Royer, E. 2002. The utility of hello messages for determining link connectivity. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications (WPMC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Couto, D. S. J. D., Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., and Morris, R. 2003. A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. CrossBow Technology, Inc. 2009. Crossbow Mica2 motes. http://www.xbow.com/Products/Productpdffiles/Wirelesspdf/MICA2Datasheet.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Das, S. M., Pucha, H., Papagiannaki, K., and Hu, Y. C. 2007. Studying wireless routing link metric dynamics. In Proceedings of the ACM Interent Measurement Conference (IMC). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Draves, R., Padhye, J., and Zill, B. 2004a. Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM Data Communications Festival. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Draves, R., Padhye, J., and Zill, B. 2004b. Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dutta, P., Grimmer, M., Arora, A., Bibyk, S., and Culler, D. 2005. Design of a wireless sensor network platform for detecting rare, random, and ephemeral events. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN) SPOTS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ertin, E., Arora, A., Ramnath, R., Nesterenko, M., Naik, V., Bapat, S., Kulathumani, V., Srid-Haran, M., Zhang, H., and Cao, H. 2006. Kansei: A testbed for sensing at scale. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN) SPOTS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fonseca, R., Gnawali, O., Jamieson, K., and Levis, P. 2007. Four-bit wireless link estimation. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. He, T., Stankovic, J., Lu, C., and Abdelzaher, T. 2003. SPEED: A stateless protocol for real-time communication in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hollander, M. 1999. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. John Wiley&Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. IEEE 802.15.4 Working Group. 2006. IEEE Std 802.15.4-2006. Wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks (WPANs). http://webstore.ansi.org/RecordDetail.aspx?sku=IEEE+Std+802.15.4-2006&source=google&adgroup=ieee&keyword=ieee%20802.15.4-2006&gclid=CLrH252ripsCFQJN5QodNkT4og.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jain, R. 1991. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis. John Wiley&Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, K.-H. and Shin, K. G. 2006. On accurate measurement of link quality in multi-hop wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kotz, D., Newport, C., and Elliott, C. 2003. The mistaken axioms of wireless-network research. Tech. rep. TR2003-467, Dartmouth College, Department of Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Krishnan, R., Raniwala, A., and Ckerchiueh, T. 2008. Design of a channel characteristics-aware routing protocol. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM MiniConference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, S., Bhattacharjee, B., and Banerjee, S. 2005. Efficient geographic routing in multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lin, S., Zhang, J., Zhou, G., Gu, L., He, T., and Stankovic, J. A. 2006. AT P C: Adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lundgren, H., Nordstrom, E., and Tschudin, C. 2002. Coping with communication gray zones in IEEE 802.11b based ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Wireless Mobile Multimedia (WoWMoM). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ng, P. C. and Liew, S. C. 2007. Throughput analysis of IEEE 802.11 multi-hop ad hoc networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 15, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Polastre, J., Hill, J., and Culler, D. 2004. Versatile low-power media access for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Qiu, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, F., Han, M. K., and Mahajan, R. 2007. A general model of wireless interference. In Proceedings of the ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ramachandran, K., Sheriff, I., Belding, E., and Almeroth, K. 2007. Routing stability in static wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Passive and Active Measurement Conference (PAM). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Texas Instruments. 2009. Chipcon CC1 0 0 RF transceiver. http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc1000.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Tiny OS Team. 2009. TinyOS. http://www.tinyos.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Willig, A. 2002. A new class of packet- and bit-level models for wireless channels. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Woo, A., Tong, T., and Culler, D. 2003. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multi-hop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Zhang, H. 2004. An event traffic trace for sensor networks. http://www.cs.wayne.edu/~hzhang/group/publications/Lites-trace.txt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang, H., Arora, A., Choi, Y. R., and Gouda, M. 2005. Reliable bursty convergecast in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Zhang, H., Arora, A., and Sinha, P. 2009. Link estimation and routing in sensor network backbones: Beacon-based or data-driven? IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhang, H., Sang, L., and Arora, A. 2008a. Data-driven link estimation in sensor networks: An accuracy perspective. Tech. rep., Wayne State University. http://www.cs.wayne.edu/~hzhang/group/TR/DNC-TR-08-02.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang, H., Sang, L., and Arora, A. 2008b. Link estimation and routing in low-power wireless networks: Beacon-based or data-driven? Tech. rep. DNC-TR-08-06, Wayne State University. http://www.cs.wayne.edu/~hzhang/group/TR/DNC-TR-08-06.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao, J. and Govindan, R. 2003. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Zuniga, M. and Krishnamachari, B. 2007. An analysis of unreliability and asymmetry in low-power wireless links. ACM Trans. Sensor Netw. 3, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On the convergence and stability of data-driven link estimation and routing in sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems
      ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems  Volume 4, Issue 3
      July 2009
      109 pages
      ISSN:1556-4665
      EISSN:1556-4703
      DOI:10.1145/1552297
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 July 2009
      • Accepted: 1 February 2009
      • Received: 1 July 2008
      Published in taas Volume 4, Issue 3

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader