skip to main content
10.1145/1553374.1553530acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Learning instance specific distances using metric propagation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In many real-world applications, such as image retrieval, it would be natural to measure the distances from one instance to others using instance specific distance which captures the distinctions from the perspective of the concerned instance. However, there is no complete framework for learning instance specific distances since existing methods are incapable of learning such distances for test instance and unlabeled data. In this paper, we propose the Isd method to address this issue. The key of Isd is metric propagation, that is, propagating and adapting metrics of individual labeled examples to individual unlabeled instances. We formulate the problem into a convex optimization framework and derive efficient solutions. Experiments show that Isd can effectively learn instance specific distances for labeled as well as unlabeled instances. The metric propagation scheme can also be used in other scenarios.

References

  1. Belkin, M., Niyogi, P., & Sindhwani, V. (2006). Manifold regularization: A geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 7, 2399--2434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blake, C., Keogh, E., & Merz, C. J. (1998). UCI repository of machine learning databases. {http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Frome, A., Singer, Y., & Malik, J. (2006). Image retrieval and classification using local distance functions. In Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 19, 417--424.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Frome, A., Singer, Y., Sha, F., & Malik, J. (2007). Learning globally-consistent local distance functions for shape-based image retrieval and classification. Proc. 11th Intl. Conf. Comp. Vision (pp. 1--8).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Goldberger, J., Roweis, S., Hinton, G., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2005). Neighbourhood components analysis. In Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 19, 513--520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kwok, J., & Tsang, I. (2003). Learning with idealized kernels. Proc. 20th Intl. Conf. Mach. Learn. (pp. 400--407).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Li, Z., Liu, J., & Tang, X. (2008). Pairwise constraint propagation by semidefinite programming for semi-supervised classification. Proc. 25th Intl. Conf. Mach. Learn. (pp. 576--583). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Weinberger, K. Q., Blitzer, J., & Saul, L. K. (2005). Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification. In Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 17, 1473--1480.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Xing, E. P., Ng, A. Y., Jordan, M. I., & Russell, S. (2002). Distance metric learning with application to clustering with side-information. In Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 14, 505--512.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yang, L. (2006). Distance metric learning: A comprehensive survey. {http://www.cse.msu.edu/~yangliu1/frame_survey_v2.pdf}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang, R., Zhang, Z., Li, M., Ma, W.-Y., & Zhang, H. J. (2005). A probabilistic semantic model for image annotation and multi-modal image retrieval. Proc. 10th Intl. Conf. Comp. Vision (pp. 846--851). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Zhang, W., Xue, X., Sun, Z., Guo, Y.-F., & Lu, H. (2007). Optimal dimensionality of metric space for classification. Proc. 24th Intl. Conf. Mach. Learn. (pp. 1135--1142). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Zhou, D., Bousquet, O., Lal, T. N., Weston, J., & Schöölkopf, B. (2003). Learning with local and global consistency. In Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 17, 321--328.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhou, Z.-H., & Dai, H.-B. (2006). Query-sensitive similarity measure for content-based image retrieval. Proc. 6th Intl. Conf. Data Min. (pp. 1211--1215). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Zhou, Z.-H., & Yang, Y. (2005). Ensembling local learners through multimodal perturbation. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man and Cybern. - B, 35, 725--735. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Zhu, X., Ghahramani, Z., & Lafferty, J. (2003). Semi-supervised learning using Gaussian fields and harmonic functions. Proc. 20th Intl. Conf. Mach. Learn. (pp. 912--919).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Learning instance specific distances using metric propagation

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              ICML '09: Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning
              June 2009
              1331 pages
              ISBN:9781605585161
              DOI:10.1145/1553374

              Copyright © 2009 Copyright 2009 by the author(s)/owner(s).

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 14 June 2009

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate140of548submissions,26%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader