skip to main content
10.1145/1555400.1555473acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Mashing up life science literature resources

Published:15 June 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the life sciences one of the pronounced problems is the deluge of new results and data that are produced on a daily basis. This data can take many different forms, e.g. microarray probes, gene sequences, protein structures and is added by hundreds of research centers world-wide in a largely uncoordinated fashion. Thus integration of life science data is growing in importance. Unfortunately, most research centers do not have particular incentive to spend efforts on integrating their data with data produced by others. This task is largely left to large publicly-sponsored institutions like the US National Library of Medicine and similar institutions in other countries. Unfortunately, despite their work in this area, the integration of web-based life science resources is still an open issue (and one ever growing in importance) as these organizations cannot cope with the information deluge that is happening on a daily basis in the life sciences. Thus it becomes essential that as many as possible third parties are engaged in the process. Here we demonstrate a simple prototype of a browser plugin that creates a platform for third parties to contribute to cross-linking related online life science data resources and thus improving the search experience and the productivity of the life science community. The plugin creates a convenient programming interface that minimizes the effort that arises for such third-party contributors. We have provided reference implementations using the plugin that cross-link life science literature resources and illustrate the potential for third parties to create mashups that could be applied also in areas other than the life sciences.

References

  1. N. Nikolov, P. Stoehr. Integrating Biomedical Publications With Existing Metadata. Proc. of the 21st IEEE Int. Symp. on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS2008), p. 653--655. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Nikolov et al. CiteXtract: Extracting Citation Data from Biomedical Literature. Proc. of the 20st IEEE Int. Symp. on Computer--Based Medical Systems (CBMS2007), p. 12--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Nikolov, P. Stoehr. Harvesting needed to maintain Scientific Literature Online. Proc. of the 8th Joint ACM/IEEE Conf. on Digital Libraries (JCDL2008), p. 460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. Bailey, G. Back. 2006. LibX -- a Firefox extension for enhanced library access. Library Hi Tech. Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Page: 290 -- 304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/citexploreGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. V. I. Levenshtein, Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10 (1966):707--710.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Mashing up life science literature resources

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            JCDL '09: Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries
            June 2009
            502 pages
            ISBN:9781605583228
            DOI:10.1145/1555400

            Copyright © 2009 Copyright is held by the author/owner(s)

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 15 June 2009

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • poster

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader