skip to main content
10.1145/1557019.1557045acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Extracting discriminative concepts for domain adaptation in text mining

Published: 28 June 2009 Publication History

Abstract

One common predictive modeling challenge occurs in text mining problems is that the training data and the operational (testing) data are drawn from different underlying distributions. This poses a great difficulty for many statistical learning methods. However, when the distribution in the source domain and the target domain are not identical but related, there may exist a shared concept space to preserve the relation. Consequently a good feature representation can encode this concept space and minimize the distribution gap. To formalize this intuition, we propose a domain adaptation method that parameterizes this concept space by linear transformation under which we explicitly minimize the distribution difference between the source domain with sufficient labeled data and target domains with only unlabeled data, while at the same time minimizing the empirical loss on the labeled data in the source domain. Another characteristic of our method is its capability for considering multiple classes and their interactions simultaneously. We have conducted extensive experiments on two common text mining problems, namely, information extraction and document classification to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (p179-chen.jpg)
MP4 File (p179-chen.mp4)

References

[1]
M. Belkin, P. Niyogi, and V. Sindhwani. Manifold regularization: A geometric framework for learning from labeled and unlabeled examples. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:2399--2434, 2006.
[2]
S. Bickel, C. Sawade, and T. Scheffer. Transfer learning by distribution matching for targeted advertising. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21, pages 145--152, 2009.
[3]
J. Blitzer, R. McDonald, and F. Pereira. Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 120--128, 2006.
[4]
H. Daume III. Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 256--263, June 2007.
[5]
A. Gretton, K. Borgwardt, M. Rasch, B. Scholkolpf, and A. Smola. A kernel method for the two-sample problem. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, pages 513--520, 2007.
[6]
J. Huang, A. Smola, A. Gretton, K. M. Borgwardt, and B. Scholkopf. Correcting sample selection bias by unlabeled data. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, pages 601--608, 2007.
[7]
S. Ji, L. Tang, S. Yu, and J. Ye. Extracting shared subspace for multi-label classifcation. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference On Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 381--389, 2008.
[8]
J. Jiang and C. Zhai. Instance weighting for domain adaptation in NLP. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 264--271, 2007.
[9]
T. Joachims. Learning to Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines - Methods, Theory, and Algorithms. Kluwer/Springer, 2002.
[10]
X. Ling, W. Dai, G.-R. Xue, Q. Yang, and Y. Yu. Spectral domain-transfer learning. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference On Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 488--496, 2008.
[11]
S. J. Pan, J. T. Kwok, and Q. Yang. Transfer learning via dimensionality reduction. In Proceedings of the 23rd AAAI conference on Artifcial Intelligence, pages 677--682, 2008.
[12]
R. Raina, A. Battle, H. Lee, B. Packer, and A. Y. Ng. Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled data. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 759--766, 2007.
[13]
S. Satpal and S. Sarawagi. Domain adaptation of conditional probability models via feature subsetting. In Proceedings of European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 224--235, 2007.
[14]
A. Storkey and M. Sugiyama. Mixture regression for covariate shift. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, pages 1337--1344, 2007.
[15]
M. Sugiyama, S. Nakajima, H. Kashima, P. von Bunau, and M. Kawanabe. Direct importance estimation with model selection and its application to covariate shift adaptation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20, pages 1433--1440, 2008.
[16]
J. Yang, R. Yan, and A. G. Hauptmann. Cross-domain video concept detection using adaptive svms. In ACM Multimedia, pages 188--197, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Multi-source Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on Graphs with Transferability ModelingProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671829(4479-4489)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Bridged-GNN: Knowledge Bridge Learning for Effective Knowledge TransferProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3614796(99-109)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Improving the co-training algorithm to enhance semi-supervised learning results2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020477(5962-5970)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
KDD '09: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
June 2009
1426 pages
ISBN:9781605584959
DOI:10.1145/1557019
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 June 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. domain adaptation
  2. feature extraction
  3. text mining

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

KDD09

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

Upcoming Conference

KDD '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Multi-source Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on Graphs with Transferability ModelingProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining10.1145/3637528.3671829(4479-4489)Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2023)Bridged-GNN: Knowledge Bridge Learning for Effective Knowledge TransferProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3614796(99-109)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
  • (2022)Improving the co-training algorithm to enhance semi-supervised learning results2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)10.1109/BigData55660.2022.10020477(5962-5970)Online publication date: 17-Dec-2022
  • (2021)Self-Training With Progressive Representation Enhancement for Unsupervised Cross-Domain Person Re-IdentificationIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2021.308229830(5287-5298)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Transfer Representation Learning With TSK Fuzzy SystemIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.295829929:3(649-663)Online publication date: Mar-2021
  • (2019)A General Domain Specific Feature Transfer Framework for Hybrid Domain AdaptationIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering10.1109/TKDE.2018.286473231:8(1440-1451)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2019
  • (2019)A Novel Doubly Reweighting Multisource Transfer Learning FrameworkIEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence10.1109/TETCI.2018.28683263:5(380-391)Online publication date: Oct-2019
  • (2019)When and How to Transfer Knowledge in Dynamic Multi-objective Optimization2019 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI)10.1109/SSCI44817.2019.9002815(2034-2041)Online publication date: Dec-2019
  • (2019)Deep Transferable Compound Representation across Domains and Tasks for Low Data Drug DiscoveryJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0062659:11(4528-4539)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2019
  • (2018)Feature Analysis of Marginalized Stacked Denoising Autoenconder for Unsupervised Domain AdaptationIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2868709(1-14)Online publication date: 2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media