skip to main content
research-article
Free Access

One size does not fit all: legal protection for non-copyrightable data

Published:01 September 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The web has become the largest data repository on the planet. An important factor contributing to its success is its openness and ease of use: anyone can contribute data to, and consume data from, the Web. As Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the Web, said, "the exciting thing is serendipitous reuse of data: one person puts data up there for one thing, and another person uses it another way." Such serendipitous data reuse is extremely valuable. Through reuse, new knowledge can be created, innovation and value-added services become possible.

However, there have been efforts to regulate and legally challenge data reuse activities. The European Union (EU) has adopted the Database Directive to restrict unauthorized data extraction and reuse. In the U.S., Congress has considered six bills, all of which failed to pass into law. These legislative activities are summarized in Figure 1; more details are furnished later. The significant uncertainty and the international differences in database legislation have created serious challenges to the "serendipitous reuse of data." The dual purposes of this article, both related to the theme "one size does not fit all," are to: summarize the range of legislation in current use and proposed; and present an economic model for interpreting or recommending policy choices that depend on factors such as cost of database creation and level of database differentiation.

As computing professionals continue to develop technologies (such as data extraction, Web mashups, Web services, and various Semantic Web technologies) to make data reuse much easier, it is important for us to understand the legal implications when applying these technologies for data reuse purposes.

References

  1. Colsten, C. Sui Generis database right: Ripe for review? The Journal of Information, Law and Technology 3 (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). First Evaluation of Directive 96/9/EC on the Legal Protection of Databases. (Dec. 12, 2005), Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Grove, J. Wanted: Public policies that foster creation of knowledge. Comm. ACM 47, 5 (2004), 23--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Heald, P.J. The extraction/duplication dichotomy: Constitutional line drawing in the database debate. Ohio State Law Journal 62, 2 (2001) 933--944.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hugenholtz, P.B. Program schedules, event data and telephone subscriber listings under the database directive: The "spin-off" doctrine in the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe. 11th Annual Conference on International Law&Policy (2003), New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Koboldt, C. The EU-Directive on the legal protection of databases and the incentives to update: An economic analysis. International Review of Law and Economics 17, 1 (1997) 127--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Lipton, J. Private rights and public policies: Reconceptualizing property in databases. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 18, 3 (2003) 773--852.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Madnick, S.E., Siegel, M.D. Seize the opportunity: Exploiting Web aggregation. MISQ Executive 1, 1 (2002) 35--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. O'Rourke, M.A. Is virtual trespass an apt analogy? Comm. ACM 44, 2 (2001), 98--103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Samuelson, P. Legal protection of database contents. Comm. ACM 39, 12 (1996), 17--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tabuchi, H. International Protection of Non-Original Databases: Studies on the Economic Impact of the Intellectual Property Protection of Non-Original Databases. CODATA (2002), Montreal, Canada; http://www.codata.org/codata02/03invited/Tabuchi/Tabuchi_CODATA_ejournal.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhu, H., Madnick, S.E., Siegel, M.D. An economic analysis of policies for the protection and reuse of non-copyrightable database contents. J. of Management Information Systems 25, 1 (2008), 199--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Zhu, H. and Madnick, S.E. Finding new uses for information. MIT Sloan Management Review 50, 4, (2009), 18--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. One size does not fit all: legal protection for non-copyrightable data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Communications of the ACM
      Communications of the ACM  Volume 52, Issue 9
      The Status of the P versus NP Problem
      September 2009
      139 pages
      ISSN:0001-0782
      EISSN:1557-7317
      DOI:10.1145/1562164
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 September 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Popular
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format