skip to main content
10.1145/1570256.1570380acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
technical-note

A genetic algorithm for learning significant phrase patterns in radiology reports

Published:08 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Radiologists disagree with each other over the characteristics and features of what constitutes a normal mammogram and the terminology to use in the associated radiology report. Recently, the focus has been on classifying abnormal or suspicious reports, but even this process needs further layers of clustering and gradation, so that individual lesions can be more effectively classified. Using a genetic algorithm, the approach described here successfully learns phrase patterns for two distinct classes of radiology reports (normal and abnormal). These patterns can then be used as a basis for automatically analyzing, categorizing, clustering, or retrieving relevant radiology reports for the user.

References

  1. Abdalla, R.M., and Teufel, S. 2006. A bootstrapping approach to unsupervised detection of cue phrase variants. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Sydney, Australia). COLING 2006. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2061--2064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Cheng, W., Greaves, C. and Warren, M. 2006. From n-gram to skipgram to concgram. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11/4: 411--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Dridi, O.; Ben Ahmed, M., "Building an Ontology-Based Framework For Semantic Information Retrieval: Application To Breast Cancer," Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications, 2008. ICTTA 2008. 3rd International Conference on, pp.1--6, 7-11 April 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Duh, K., and Kirchhoff, K. 2004. Automatic learning of language model structure. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (Geneva, Switzerland). COLING 2004. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2061--2064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fox, C. 1992. "Lexical analysis and stoplists." In Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms (ed. W.B. Frakes and R. Baeza-Yates), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jing-Yan Wang; Zhen Zhu, "Framework of multi-agent information retrieval system based on ontology and its application," Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 2008 International Conference on, pp.1615--1620, 12-15 July 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kai Kang; Kunhui Lin; Changle Zhou; Feng Guo, "Domain-Specific Information Retrieval Based on Improved Language Model," Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 2007. FSKD 2007. Fourth International Conference on, pp.374--378, 24-27 Aug. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Patton, M.Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Second Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Patton, R.M., Beckerman, B., and Potok, T.E. 2008. Analysis of mammography reports using maximum variation sampling. Proceedings of the 4th GECCO Workshop on Medical Applications of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (MedGEC), Atlanta, USA, July 2008. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2061--2064. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Pirkola, A, Keskustalo, H., Leppänen, E., Känsälä, A.and Järvelin, K. 2002. "Targeted s-gram matching: a novel n-gram matching technique for cross- and monolingual word form variants." Information Research, 7(2) {Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/7-2/paper126.html}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Porter, M. 1980. "An algorithm for suffix stripping." Program vol. 14, pp. 130--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Porter Stemming Algorithm. Current Feb. 5, 2009. http://www.tartarus.org/~martin/PorterStemmer/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Raghavan, V.V., and Wong, S.K.M. 1986. "A critical analysis of vector space model for information retrieval." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol.37 (5), p. 279--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Reed, J.W., Potok, T.E., and Patton, R.M. 2004. "A multi-agent system for distributed cluster analysis," in Proceedings of Third International Workshop on Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems (SELMAS'04) Workshop in conjunction with the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: IEE, pp. 152--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rudolph, G., "Convergence analysis of canonical genetic algorithms," Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on, vol.5, no.1, pp.96--101, Jan 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Salton, G. 1983. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Siddiqui, T.J., "Integrating notion of agency and semantics in information retrieval: an intelligent multi-agent model," Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, 2005. ISDA '05. Proceedings. 5th International Conference on, pp. 160--165, 8-10 Sept. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A genetic algorithm for learning significant phrase patterns in radiology reports

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  GECCO '09: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers
                  July 2009
                  1760 pages
                  ISBN:9781605585055
                  DOI:10.1145/1570256

                  Copyright © 2009 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 8 July 2009

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • technical-note

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

                  Upcoming Conference

                  GECCO '24
                  Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
                  July 14 - 18, 2024
                  Melbourne , VIC , Australia

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader