skip to main content
10.1145/1570433.1570480acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An open source workbench for prototyping multimodal interactions based on off-the-shelf heterogeneous components

Published:15 July 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present an extensible software workbench for supporting the effective and dynamic prototyping of multimodal interactive systems. We hypothesize the construction of such applications to be based on the assembly of several components, namely various and sometimes interchangeable modalities at the input, fusion-fission components, and also several modalities at the output. Successful realization of advanced interactions can benefit from early prototyping and the iterative implementation of design requires the easy integration, combination, replacement, or upgrade of components. We have designed and implemented a thin integration platform able to manage these key elements, and thus provide the research community a tool to bridge the gap of the current support for multimodal applications implementation. The platform is included within a workbench offering visual editors, non-intrusive tools, components and techniques to assemble various modalities provided in different implementation technologies, while keeping a high level of performance of the integrated system.

References

  1. Benoit, A., Bonnaud, L., Caplier, A., Damousis, I., Tzovaras, D., Jourde, E., Nigay, L., Serrano M. and Lawson, J-Y. 2006. Multimodal Signal Processing and Interaction for a Driving Simulation: Component-based Architecture. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces,1, 1,49--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bouchet, J., Nigay, L. (2004). ICARE: A Component-Based Approach for the Design and Development of Multimodal Interfaces, Extended Abstracts CHI'04, ACM, pp. 1325--1328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Camurri, A., Ricchetti, M., and Trocca, R. 1999. EyesWeb -- toward gesture and affect recognition in dance/music interactive systems, Proc. IEEE Multimedia Systems '99, Firenze, Italy, June 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cohen, P. R., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., Smith, I., Chen, L., and Clow, J. 1997. QuickSet: multimodal interaction for distributed applications, Proc. of MULTIMEDIA '97. ACM Press, pp. 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Coutaz, J. Nigay, L. Salber, D. Blandford, A. May, J. and Young, R. (1995), Four Easy Pieces for Assessing the Usability of Multimodal in Interaction the CARE Properties, Proc.of Interact' 95, pp. 115--120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dragicevic P. and Fekete J-D. Input Device Selection and Interaction Configuration with ICON: Joint proc. of IHM'01-HCI'01. Springer Verlag, pp 543--558.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. eNTERFACE Workshops, http://www.enterface.net/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gray, P., Ramsay, A., Serrano, M. A demonstration of the OpenInterface Interaction Development Environment. UIST'07 Adj. Proc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Sakoe, S. Chiba, Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. In IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 26 (1) (1978) 43--49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartmann, B., Abdulla, L., Mittal, M., and Klemmer, S. R. 2007. Authoring sensor-based interactions by demonstration with direct manipulation and pattern recognition. Proc. of CHI '07. ACM Press, 145--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hartmann, B., Klemmer, S. R., Bernstein, M., Abdulla, L., Burr, B., Robinson-Mosher, A., and Gee, J. 2006. Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis. Proc. of UIST '06. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kato, H., Billinghurst, M. (1999) Marker Tracking and HMD Calibration for a video-based Augmented Reality Conferencing System. Proc. of IWAR'99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lawson, J.-Y., Vanderdonckt, J., Macq, B. Rapid Prototyping of Multimodal Interactive Applications Based on Off-The-Shelf Heterogeneous Components. UIST'08 Adjunct. Proc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lawson, J.-Y., 2006. OpenInterface Description Languages Specification. Technical report, 2006: http://www.openinterface.org/platform/documentationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, Y. and Landay, J. A. 2005. Informal prototyping of continuous graphical interactions by demonstration, Proc. of UIST '05. ACM Press, pp. 221--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Martin, J. C., TYCOON: Theoretical Framework and Software Tools for Multimodal Interfaces, Intelligence and Multimodality in Multimedia Interfaces, AAAI Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Max/MSP, http://www.cycling74.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Maynes-Aminzade, D., Winograd, T., and Igarashi, T. (2007). Eyepatch: prototyping camera-based interaction through Examples, Proc. of UIST'07, ACM Press, pp. 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mehta, N. R., Medvidovic, N., and Phadke, S. 2000. Towards a taxonomy of software connectors. Proc. of ICSE '00. ACM Press, pp. 178--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Merrill, D. and Paradiso, J. A Personalization, Expressivity, and Learnability of an Implicit Mapping Strategy for Physical Interfaces, Proc. of CHI'05 ACM Press, pp. 2152--2161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Puckette, M., 1996. "Pure Data: another integrated computer music environment.", Proc. of the Second Intercollege Computer Music Concerts, Tachikawa, pp. 37--41Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Schedlbauer, M. J. An extensible platform for the interactive exploration of Fitts' Law and related movement time models. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, pp. 2633--2638. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaw, M. and Garlan, D. Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice-Hall, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sinha, A. K. and Landay, J. A. 2003. Capturing user tests in a multimodal, multidevice informal prototyping tool. Proc. of ICMI '03, ACM Press, pp. 117--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Trevisan, Daniela G.; Nicolas, Vincent; Macq, Benoit; NEDEL, Luciana P. MedicalStudio: a medical component-based framework, Proc of.WIM '07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Vybornova, O., Mendonça, H., Lawson, J.Y., Macq, B. High Level Data Fusion on a Multimodal Interactive Applications Platform. Proc of ISM'08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Web Services Description Language (WSDL), http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An open source workbench for prototyping multimodal interactions based on off-the-shelf heterogeneous components

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          EICS '09: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems
          July 2009
          348 pages
          ISBN:9781605586007
          DOI:10.1145/1570433

          Copyright © 2009 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 July 2009

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate73of299submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          EICS '24

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader