skip to main content
10.1145/1571941.1571950acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Global ranking by exploiting user clicks

Published: 19 July 2009 Publication History

Abstract

It is now widely recognized that user interactions with search results can provide substantial relevance information on the documents displayed in the search results. In this paper, we focus on extracting relevance information from one source of user interactions, i.e., user click data, which records the sequence of documents being clicked and not clicked in the result set during a user search session. We formulate the problem as a global ranking problem, emphasizing the importance of the sequential nature of user clicks, with the goal to predict the relevance labels of all the documents in a search session. This is distinct from conventional learning to rank methods that usually design a ranking model defined on a single document; in contrast, in our model the relational information among the documents as manifested by an aggregation of user clicks is exploited to rank all the documents jointly. In particular, we adapt several sequential supervised learning algorithms, including the conditional random field (CRF), the sliding window method and the recurrent sliding window method, to the global ranking problem. Experiments on the click data collected from a commercial search engine demonstrate that our methods can outperform the baseline models for search results re-ranking.

References

[1]
S. Brin and L. Page. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on World Wide Web, 1998.
[2]
C. Burges, T. Shaked, E. Renshaw, A. Lazier, M. Deeds, N. Hamilton, and G. Hullender. Learning to rank using gradient descent. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 2005.
[3]
B. Carterette and R. Jones. Evaluating search engines by modeling the relationship between relevance and clicks. In NIPS, 2007.
[4]
N. Craswell, O. Zoeterm, M. Taylor, and B. Ramsey. An experimental comparison of click position-bias models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining (WSDM), 2008.
[5]
T.G. Dietterich. Machine learning for sequential data: a review. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (2396):15--30, 2002.
[6]
G. Dupret and B. Piwowarski. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR), 2008.
[7]
J. Friedman. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Statist., 29:1189--1232, 2001.
[8]
N. Fuhr and C. Buckley. A probabilistic learning approach for document indexing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 9:223--248, 1991.
[9]
T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2002.
[10]
T. Joachims, L. Granka, and B. Pan. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In Proceedings of 28th ACM SIGIR, 2005.
[11]
A. Kulesza and F. Pereira. Structured learning with approximate inference. In NIPS, 2007.
[12]
J. Lafferty, A. McCallum, and F. Pereira. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In ICML, pages 282--289, 2001.
[13]
P. Li, C. Burges, and Q. Wu. Mcrank: Learning to rank using multiple classifications and gradient boosting. In NIPS, 2008.
[14]
T. Qin, T. Liu, X. Zhang, D. Wang, and H. Li. Global ranking using continuous conditional random fields. In NIPS, 2008.
[15]
L.R. Rabiner. A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE, pages 257--286, 1989.
[16]
F. Radlinski and T. Joachims. Evaluating the robustness of learning from implicit feedback. In ICML Workshop on Learning In Web Search, 2005.
[17]
F. Radlinski and T. Joachims. Active exploration for learning ranking from clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2007.
[18]
G. Salton. Automatic Text Processing. Addison Wesley, MA, 1989.
[19]
C. Sutton and A. McCallum. An introduction to conditional random fields for relational learning, chapter Book chapter in Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT Press, 2006.
[20]
V.N. Vapnik. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, 1995.
[21]
H.M. Wallach. Conditional random fields: An introduction. Technical report, Dept. of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, 2004.
[22]
X. Wang and C. Zhai. Learn from web search logs to organize search results. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGIR, 2007.
[23]
Z. Zheng, H. Zha, K. Chen, and G. Sun. A regression framework for learning ranking functions using relative relevance judgments. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGIR conference, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Optimizing Whole-Page Presentation for Web SearchACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/320446112:3(1-25)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2018
  • (2017)Image Re-Ranking Based on Topic DiversityIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2017.269962326:8(3734-3747)Online publication date: Aug-2017
  • (2017)Automatically generating effective search queries directly from community question-answering questions for finding related questionsExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.04177:C(11-19)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGIR '09: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
July 2009
896 pages
ISBN:9781605584836
DOI:10.1145/1571941
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 July 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. conditional random field
  2. experimental evaluation
  3. implicit relevance feedback
  4. learning to rank
  5. sequential supervised learning
  6. user clicks

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SIGIR '09
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2018)Optimizing Whole-Page Presentation for Web SearchACM Transactions on the Web10.1145/320446112:3(1-25)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2018
  • (2017)Image Re-Ranking Based on Topic DiversityIEEE Transactions on Image Processing10.1109/TIP.2017.269962326:8(3734-3747)Online publication date: Aug-2017
  • (2017)Automatically generating effective search queries directly from community question-answering questions for finding related questionsExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.04177:C(11-19)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2017
  • (2016)Listwise ranking functions for statistical machine translationIEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing10.5555/2992818.299282824:8(1464-1472)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016
  • (2016)Beyond RankingProceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/2835776.2835824(103-112)Online publication date: 8-Feb-2016
  • (2016)Tag-Based Image Search by Social Re-rankingIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2016.256809918:8(1628-1639)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2016
  • (2016)Listwise Ranking Functions for Statistical Machine TranslationIEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing10.1109/TASLP.2016.256052724:8(1464-1472)Online publication date: Aug-2016
  • (2016)Learning to rank with click-through features in a reinforcement learning frameworkInternational Journal of Web Information Systems10.1108/IJWIS-12-2015-004612:4(448-476)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2016
  • (2015)MergeRUCBProceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining10.1145/2684822.2685290(17-26)Online publication date: 2-Feb-2015
  • (2014)Learning to Rank for Information Retrieval and Natural Language Processing, Second EditionSynthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies10.2200/S00607ED2V01Y201410HLT0267:3(1-121)Online publication date: 2-Oct-2014
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media