skip to main content
10.1145/1571941.1571955acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Segment-level display time as implicit feedback: a comparison to eye tracking

Published: 19 July 2009 Publication History

Abstract

We examine two basic sources for implicit relevance feedback on the segment level for search personalization: eye tracking and display time. A controlled study has been conducted where 32 participants had to view documents in front of an eye tracker, query a search engine, and give explicit relevance ratings for the results. We examined the performance of the basic implicit feedback methods with respect to improved ranking and compared their performance to a pseudo relevance feedback baseline on the segment level and the original ranking of a Web search engine.
Our results show that feedback based on display time on the segment level is much coarser than feedback from eye tracking. But surprisingly, for re-ranking and query expansion it did work as well as eye-tracking-based feedback. All behavior-based methods performed significantly better than our non-behavior-based baseline and especially improved poor initial rankings of the Web search engine.
The study shows that segment-level display time yields comparable results as eye-tracking-based feedback. Thus, it should be considered in future personalization systems as an inexpensive but precise method for implicit feedback.

References

[1]
E. Agichtein, E. Brill, and S. Dumais. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In SIGIR '06, pp. 19--26, 2006.
[2]
J.W. Ahn, P. Brusilovsky, D. He, J. Grady, and Q. Li. Personalized web exploration with task models. In WWW '08, pp. 1--10, 2008.
[3]
I. Arapakis, J.M. Jose, and P.D. Gray. Affective feedback: an investigation into the role of emotions in the information seeking process. In SIGIR '08, pp. 395--402, 2008.
[4]
N.J. Belkin. Some(what) grand challenges for information retrieval. SIGIR Forum, 42(1):47--54, 2008.
[5]
G. Buscher, A. Dengel, and L. van Elst. Eye movements as implicit relevance feedback. In CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 2991--2996, 2008.
[6]
G. Buscher, A. Dengel, and L. van Elst. Query expansion using gaze-based feedback on the sub-document level. In SIGIR '08, pp. 387--394, 2008.
[7]
M. Claypool, P. Le, M. Wased, and D. Brown. Implicit interest indicators. In IUI '01: Proc. of the 6th intl. conf. on Intelligent user interfaces, pp. 33--40, 2001.
[8]
S. Fox, K. Karnawat, M. Mydland, S. Dumais, and T. White. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 23(2):147--168, 2005.
[9]
G. Golovchinsky, M.N. Price, and B.N. Schilit. From reading to retrieval: freeform ink annotations as queries. In SIGIR '99, pp. 19--25, 1999.
[10]
K. Gyllstrom and C. Soules. Seeing is retrieving: building information context from what the user sees. In IUI '08: Proc. of the 13th intl. conf. on Intelligent user interfaces, pp. 189--198, 2008.
[11]
K. Jarvelin and J. Kekäläinen. Ir evaluation methods for retrieving highly relevant documents. In SIGIR '00, pp. 41--48, 2000.
[12]
T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, F. Radlinski, and G. Gay. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 25(2), April 2007.
[13]
D. Kelly and N.J. Belkin. Reading time, scrolling and interaction: exploring implicit sources of user preferences for relevance feedback. In SIGIR '01, pp. 408--409, 2001.
[14]
D. Kelly and N.J. Belkin. Display time as implicit feedback: understanding task effects. In SIGIR '04, pp. 377--384, 2004.
[15]
D. Kelly and J. Teevan. Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. SIGIR Forum, 37(2):18--28, 2003.
[16]
M. Melucci and R.W. White. Discovering hidden contextual factors for implicit feedback. In Proc. of the CIR'07 Workshop on Context-Based Information Retrieval in conjunction with CONTEXT-07, 2007.
[17]
M. Morita and Y. Shinoda. Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval. In SIGIR '94, pp. 272--281, 1994. Springer.
[18]
D.W. Oard and J. Kim. Modeling information content using observable behavior. In Proc. of the 64 Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, pp. 38--45, 2001.
[19]
R. Rafter and B. Smyth. Passive profiling from server logs in an online recruitment environment. In ITWP 2001: Proc. of the IJCAI Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization, 2001.
[20]
J. Rocchio. The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, chapter Relevance feedback in information retrieval, pp. 313--323. Prentice Hall, 1971.
[21]
J. Salojarvi, K. Puolamäki, and S. Kaski. Implicit relevance feedback from eye movements. In ICANN'05, pp. 513--518, 2005.
[22]
R.W. White and D. Kelly. A study on the effects of personalization and task information on implicit feedback performance. In CIKM '06: Proc. of the 15th ACM intl. conf. on Information and knowledge management, pp. 297--306, 2006.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Modeling Attentive Interaction Behavior for Web Content Identification in Exploratory Information SeekingProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36997508:4(1-28)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
  • (2024)Bridging the Analytics Gap: Optimizing Content Performance using Actionable Knowledge DiscoveryProceedings of the 35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media10.1145/3648188.3675121(185-192)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Understanding Documentation Use Through Log Analysis: A Case Study of Four Cloud ServicesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642721(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Segment-level display time as implicit feedback: a comparison to eye tracking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SIGIR '09: Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
    July 2009
    896 pages
    ISBN:9781605584836
    DOI:10.1145/1571941
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 July 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. display time
    2. eye tracking
    3. implicit feedback
    4. personalization

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    SIGIR '09
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Modeling Attentive Interaction Behavior for Web Content Identification in Exploratory Information SeekingProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/36997508:4(1-28)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
    • (2024)Bridging the Analytics Gap: Optimizing Content Performance using Actionable Knowledge DiscoveryProceedings of the 35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media10.1145/3648188.3675121(185-192)Online publication date: 10-Sep-2024
    • (2024)Understanding Documentation Use Through Log Analysis: A Case Study of Four Cloud ServicesProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642721(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2022)Implicit Estimation of Paragraph Relevance From Eye MovementsFrontiers in Computer Science10.3389/fcomp.2021.8085073Online publication date: 7-Jan-2022
    • (2022)Crystalline: Lowering the Cost for Developers to Collect and Organize Information for Decision MakingProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501968(1-16)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
    • (2020)Eye-Tracking Studies of Web Search Engines: A Systematic Literature ReviewInformation10.3390/info1106030011:6(300)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2020
    • (2020)Personalization in text information retrievalJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology10.1002/asi.2423471:3(349-369)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2020
    • (2019)Knowing User Better: Jointly Predicting Click-Through and Playtime for Micro-Video2019 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME)10.1109/ICME.2019.00088(472-477)Online publication date: Jul-2019
    • (2017)Investigating users’ eye movement behavior in critiquing-based recommender systemsAI Communications10.3233/AIC-17073730:3-4(207-222)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2017
    • (2017)Auditing Search Engines for Differential Satisfaction Across DemographicsProceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion10.1145/3041021.3054197(626-633)Online publication date: 3-Apr-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media