skip to main content
10.1145/1582716.1582796acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespodcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Brief announcement: exactly electing a unique leader is not harder than computing symmetric functions on anonymous quantum networks

Published:10 August 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proves that, if quantum communication and computation are available and the number of parties is given, the leader election problem can exactly (i.e., without error in bounded time) be solved with at most the same complexity up to a constant factor as that of computing certain symmetric functions on an anonymous network of any unknown topology. Together with a novel quantum algorithm that computes a certain symmetric function, this characterization yields a quantum leader election algorithm that is more efficient than existing algorithms.

References

  1. Y. Afek and Y. Matias. Elections in anonymous networks. Inf. Comput., 113(2):312--330, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Angluin. Local and global properties in networks of processors (extended abstract). In Proc. 20th ACM STOC, pages 82--93, 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. Attiya, M. Snir, and M. K. Warmuth. Computing on an anonymous ring. J. ACM, 35(4):845--875, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. G. Brassard, P. Høyer, M. Mosca, and A. Tapp. Quantum amplitude amplification and estimation. In Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: A Millennium Volume, AMS Contemporary Mathematics Series vol. 305, pages 53--74. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. de Wolf. Quantum communication and complexity. Theor. Comput. Sci., 287(1):337--353, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. V. S. Denchev and G. Pandurangan. Distributed quantum computing: A new frontier in distributed systems or science fiction? ACM SIGACT News, 39(3):77--95, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. D'Hondt and P. Panangaden. The computational power of the W and GHZ states. Quantum Inf. Comput., 6(2):173---183, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Gavoille, A. Kosowski, and M. Markiewicz. What can be observed locally? Round-based models for quantum distributed computing. arXiv:0903.1133, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Itai and M. Rodeh. Symmetry breaking in distributive networks. In Proc. 22nd IEEE FOCS, pages 150--158, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Itai and M. Rodeh. Symmetry breaking in distributed networks. Inf. Comput., 88(1):60--87, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. E. Kranakis and D. Krizanc. Distributed computing on cayley networks (extended abstract). In Proc. 4th IEEE SPDP, pages 222--229, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Kranakis and D. Krizanc. Distributed computing on anonymous hypercube networks. J. Algorithms, 23(1):32--50, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. E. Kranakis, D. Krizanc, and J. van den Berg. Computing boolean functions on anonymous networks. Inf. Comput., 114(2):214--236, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. N. A. Lynch. Distributed Algorithms. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. P. Pal, S. K. Singh, and S. Kumar. Multi-partite quantum entanglement versus randomization: Fair and unbiased leader election in networks. arXiv:quant-ph/0306195, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. Tani, H. Kobayashi, and K. Matsumoto. Exact quantum algorithms for the leader election problem. In Proc. 22nd STACS, LNCS vol. 3404, pages 581--592,2005. (Full version in arXiv:0712.4213). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Yamashita and T. Kameda. Computing on anonymous networks: Part I--characterizing the solvable cases. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 7(1):69--89, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Yamashita and T. Kameda. Computing on anonymous networks: Part II--decision and memobership problems. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 7(1):90--96, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Brief announcement: exactly electing a unique leader is not harder than computing symmetric functions on anonymous quantum networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        PODC '09: Proceedings of the 28th ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing
        August 2009
        356 pages
        ISBN:9781605583969
        DOI:10.1145/1582716

        Copyright © 2009 Copyright is held by the author/owner(s)

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 August 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        PODC '09 Paper Acceptance Rate27of110submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate740of2,477submissions,30%

        Upcoming Conference

        PODC '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader