skip to main content
10.1145/1600193.1600237acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocengConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A panlingual anomalous text detector

Published:16 September 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

In a large-scale book scanning operation, material can vary widely in language, script, genre, domain, print quality, and other factors, giving rise to a corresponding variability in the OCRed text. It is often desirable to automatically detect errorful and otherwise anomalous text segments, so that they can be filtered out or appropriately flagged, for such applications as indexing, mining, analyzing, displaying, and selectively re-processing such data. Moreover, it is advantageous to require that the automated detector be independent of the underlying OCR engine (or engines), that it work over a broad range of languages, that it seamlessly handle mixed-language material, and that it accommodate documents that contain domain-specific and otherwise rare terminology. A technique is presented that satisfies these requirements, using an adaptive mixture of character-level N-gram language models. Its design, training, implementation, and evaluation are described within the context of high-volume book scanning.

References

  1. K. Atkinson. GNU Aspell. http://aspell.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Dengel, R. Hoch, F. Hönes, and A. Weigel. Techniques for improving OCR results. In P. S. P. Wang and H. Bunke, editors, Handbook on Character Recognition and Document Image Analysis, pages 227--258. World Scientific, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. R. Golding and D. Roth. A winnow-based approach to context-sensitive spelling correction. Mach. Learn., 34(1-3):107--130, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Holley. How good can it get? Analysing and improving OCR accuracy in large scale historic newspaper digitisation programs. D-Lib Magazine, 15(3/4), March/April 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. W. C. Janssen, J. Breidenbach, L. Good, and A. Popat. Making UpLib useful: Personal document engineering. Technical Report TR-05-5, Xerox PARC, Palo Alto, USA, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. G. Kendall. Rank correlation methods. Hafner, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. O. Kolak, W. Byrne, and P. Resnik. A generative probabilistic OCR model for NLP applications. In Proc. HLT-NAACL, pages 55--62, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Kulp and A. Kontostathis. On retrieving legal files: Shortening documents and weeding out garbage. In Proc. TREC, November 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Moffat. Implementing the PPM data compression scheme. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 38(11):1917--1921, Nov 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. A. Redner and H. F. Walker. Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm. SIAM Review, 26(2):195--239, Apr. 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. K. Taghva, T. Nartker, A. Condit, and J. Borsack. Automatic removal of garbage strings in OCR text: An implementation. In Proc. 5th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando, USA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A panlingual anomalous text detector

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              DocEng '09: Proceedings of the 9th ACM symposium on Document engineering
              September 2009
              264 pages
              ISBN:9781605585758
              DOI:10.1145/1600193

              Copyright © 2009 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 16 September 2009

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate178of537submissions,33%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader