Cláudio Teixeira
Joaquim Sousa Pinto
ABSTRACT
Considering the notoriety that XML has gained in the last years as an exchange format, how can we conciliate XML data exchange and presentation with efficient data storage? Is there a one-fits-all solution? If not, what are the possible scenarios and solutions? This paper presents preliminary results on performance tests over several state-of-the-art solutions for XML storage, indexing and retrieval.
- Matthias, N., K. Irina, and S. Berni, An XML transaction processing benchmark, in Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. 2007, ACM: Beijing, China. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- DeWitt, D. J., The Wisconsin Benchmark: Past, Present, and Future, in Benchmark Handbook for Database and Transaction Processing Systems, J. Gray, Editor. 1993, Morgan Kaufmann. p. 269--316.Google Scholar
- www.ifla.org. UNIMARC Manual: Bibliographic Format 1994 - IFLA Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC Core Programme (UBCIM). 2000 {cited 11 February 2008}; Available from: http://www.ifla.org/VI/3/p1996-1/sec-uni.htm.Google Scholar
- Carvalho, J., An XML representation of the UNIMARC Manual: a working prototype, in World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council. 2005: Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
- Bourret, R. XML-DBMS: Middleware for Transferring Data between XML Documents and Relational Databases. 2004 {cited 2004 Nov. 2004}; Available from: http://www.rpbourret.com/xmldbms/index.htm.Google Scholar
- Corporation, O. The Oracle XML Developer's Kit. {cited 2004 November 2004}; Available from: http://technet.oracle.com/tech/xml/.Google Scholar
- Khin-Myo, W., N. Wee-Keong, and L. Ee-Peng, An Architectural Framework for Native XML Data Management, in Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Cyberworlds. 2003, IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanjay, G., G. Howard, and L. Shun-Tak, The Google file system. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 2003. 37(5): p. 29--43. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mabanza, N., J. Chadwick, and G. S. V. R. K. Rao. Performance evaluation of Open Source Native XML databases - A Case Study. in Advanced Communication Technology, 2006. ICACT 2006. The 8th International Conference. 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kroenke, D. M., Beyond the Relational Database Model. Computer, 2005. 38(5): p. 89--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- modis.ispras.ru. Sedna XML database. 2008 {cited 11 February 2008}; Available from: http://modis.ispras.ru/sedna/.Google Scholar
- apache. Lucene.Net. 2007 {cited 2007 Nov. 2007}; Available from: http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- UNIMARC-XML performance testing
Recommendations
XML Data Stores: Emerging Practices
Because XML is rapidly becoming the Internet standard for data representation and exchange, efficient XML document storage has become a core data management issue. Most early XML storage practices rely on conventional database management systems. ...
Customizable XML Management on a Navigational Database Framework
DEXA '08: Proceedings of the 2008 19th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems ApplicationXML is a commonly used and popular representation format and there is an increasing need for efficient storage and retrieval of XML. Available technology for storage and management of XML includes native XML storage and shredding of XML into relational ...
A comprehensive solution to the XML-to-relational mapping problem
WIDM '04: Proceedings of the 6th annual ACM international workshop on Web information and data managementThe use of relational database management systems (RDBMSs) to store and query XML data has attracted considerable interest with a view to leveraging their powerful and reliable data management services. Due to the mismatch between the relational and XML ...
Comments