skip to main content
10.1145/1621841.1621868acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmindtrekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Are the open issues of social software-based personal learning environment practices being addressed?

Published:30 September 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media has a particularly strong role in many types of activities today. It has also provided new kinds of possibilities, ways to act and be in contact with other people in networks and communities. Learning environment developers have noticed the potential of social media applications and many new theoretical constructs have been built to help apply the tools for learning. One of the most promising ones has been the PLE (Personal Learning Environment) which will allow learners to control their own learning better. PLE can also help to see learning in a more holistic way because it includes operating environments and networks people already use (also in leisure time). But PLE has also raised certain issues that have not been thoroughly considered, like continua of distributed-integrated architecture solutions, individual-collective processes and formal-informal operating environment, although they present several challenges for student learning, motivation and educational organizations.

References

  1. Ahonen, H., Engeström, Y., and Virkkunen J. 2000. Knowledge Management -- The Second Generation: Creating Competencies Within and Between Work Communities in the Competence Laboratory. In Y. Malhotra (ed.) Knowledge Management and Virtual Organizations. 282--305. London: Idea Group Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, P. 2007. What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, Feb. 2007 Available from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf accessed 16 March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, A. L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon, A., and Campione, J. C. 1993. Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognition (188--228). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chatti, M. 2009. Mashup Personal Learning Environments. Available from http://mohamedaminechatti.blogspot.com/2009/05/mashup-personal-learning-environments.html accessed 2 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Chatti, M. 2007. Personal Environments Loosely Joined. Available from http://mohamedaminechatti.blogspot.com/2007/01/personal-environments-loosely-joined.html accessed 2 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Collins, A., Joseph, D., and Bielaczyc, K. 2004. Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Downes, S. 2007. Learning networks in practice. Emerging technologies for learning. Available from http://partners.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/emerging_technologies07_chapter2.pdf accessed 1 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Dysthe, O. and Engelsen, K. S. 2004. Portfolio and assessment in teacher education in Norway: a theory-based discussion of different models in two sites. Assessment&Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(2), 239--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gathercoal P., Love D., Bryde B., and McKean G. 2002. On implementing Web-Based Electronic. Portfolios. Educause Quarterly 25(2), 29--37. Available from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0224.pdf accessed 3 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. JISC infoNet. 2008. e-Portfolios infoKit. Available from http://www.jiscinfonet.ac.uk/infokits/e-portfolios/e-portfolios-infokit-printable.pdf accessed 3 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jonassen, D. H. and Rohrer-Murphy, L. 1999. Activity Theory as a Framework for Designing Constructivist Learning Environments. Educational Technology: Research and Development 47(1), 61--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 46(2), 75--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Korhonen, V., Kohonen, V., Tolkki, L., Syvänen, A., and Ahonen, M. 2007. e-Portfolios within Life-wide Professional Development. In Kankaanranta, M., Grant, A., and Linnakylä, P. (eds.) e-Portfolio -- Adding Value to Lifelong Learning. Jyväskylä: Institute for Educational Research, Jyväskylä University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Laakkonen, I. and Juntunen, M. 2009. Tulevaisuuden oppimisympäristöt? -- Henkilökohtaiset ja avoimet oppimisen tilat. Available from http://fshape.wordpress.com/tulevaisuuden-oppimisymparisto-henkilokohtaiset-ja-avoimet-oppimisen-tilat/ accessed 30 May 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lietsala, K. and Virkkunen, E. 2008. Social Media. Introduction to the tools and processes of participatory economy. University of Tampere. HypermedialaboratorioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lubensky, R. 2006. Personal Learning Environments: What They Are And How To Implement Them. Available from http://www.masternewmedia.org/learning_educational_technologies/learning-environments/PLE-personal-learning-environments-present-future-20070615.htm accessed 2 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez, M. and Bunderson, C. 2000. Foundations for Personalized Web Learning Environments. ALN Magazine. (4)2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Richardson, W. 2008. Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms. 2nd edition. Corwin Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Syvänen, A. 2007. Documenting Authentic Learning with Smart Phones. Junior Researchers of EARLI Conference (JURE 2007), 27--28 August 2007 in Budabest, Hungary. Poster presentation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tillema, H. H. and Smith, K. 2000. Learning from Portfolios: differential use of feedback in portfolio construction, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26(1), 193--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Tosh, D. 2005. ELGG -- a Personal Learning Landscale. Available from http://tesl-ej.org/ej34/m1.html accessed 2 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. van Harmelen, M. 2006. Personal Learning Environments make a step forward. Guest Contribution from Mark van Harmelen. Available from http://fm.schmoller.net/2006/06/personal_learni.html accessed 2 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., and Raymond, P. 1991. Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923--929.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Wenger, E. and Snyder, W. 2000. Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review. January-February, 139--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P., and Milligan, C. 2006. Personal Learning Environments: Challenging the Dominant Design of Educational Systems. First European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2006, Proceedings of the EC-TEL06 Workshops, 506--511 Available from http://ftp.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-213/paper28.pdf accessed 2 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, S. 2005. Future VLE. Available from http://www.cetis.ac.uk/members/scott/blogview?entry=20050125170206 accessed 2 June 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Are the open issues of social software-based personal learning environment practices being addressed?

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            MindTrek '09: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era
            September 2009
            254 pages
            ISBN:9781605586335
            DOI:10.1145/1621841

            Copyright © 2009 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 30 September 2009

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate110of207submissions,53%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader