skip to main content
research-article
Free access

Mobile Web 2.0 with multi-display buttons

Published: 01 January 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Introduction
User-Generated Content (UGC) IS A BURGEONING social phenomenon being watched in today's world with keen interest. UGC is an online new-media content created by users rather than by conventional media such as broadcasters. A typical example would be Flickr, an online photo-sharing site with 37 million images, to which its 1.2 million members add up to 200,000 images daily. UGC is shifting the paradigm of Internet use away from the one-way propagation of media content by companies towards the creation and sharing of media content by and among ordinary users.
The mobile phone is an especially important means of promoting user generation and exchange of media content. Many mobile phones now have built-in digital cameras and inherent network connectivity. These features have greatly facilitated the creation and sharing of media content. For instance, users can immediately upload photos on Flickr with their mobile phones as well as access Flickr and browse other people's media content.
However, the constraints of a typical mobile phone---its small display and limited number of buttons---make use of mobile UGC services challenging. Only a few studies have investigated hardware or software alternatives to address these problems. This article presents a new user interface (UI) for mobile phones, one that makes use of UGC services easier and more efficient.
The new interface has two key characteristics: one pertaining to content structure, and another to content visualization. More specifically, the new UI employs two major mobile Web 2.0 technologies, the tag and the tag cloud, and multi-display buttons increase the display size and flexibility of individual buttons. The interface is dedicated specifically towards supporting exploratory browsing within mobile UGC services, because users of such services are likely to focus on exploratory browsing and serendipitous discovery and be more inclined toward entertainment rather than utility. Here, we describe the new interface and investigate whether it aids in enhancing exploratory browsing within mobile UGC services.

References

[1]
Ames, M. and Naaman, M. Why we Tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (San Jose, CA, 2007), 971--980.
[2]
Andrews, R. Flickr fans to Yahoo: Flick off! Wired News, (2005); http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2005/08/68654
[3]
de Vries, E. and de Jong, T. Using information systems while performing complex tasks: An example from architectural design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46, 1 (1997), 31--54.
[4]
Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., and Tam, K.Y. The effects of information format and shopping task on consumers' online shopping behavior: A cognitive fit perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 21, 3 (2004), 149--184.
[5]
Marchionini, G. and Shneiderman, B. Finding facts vs. browsing knowledge in hypertext systems. IEEE Computer 21, 1 (1988), 70--79.
[6]
Murugesan, S. Understanding Web 2.0. IT Professional 9, 4 (2007), 34--41.
[7]
Pirolli, P., Card, S.K., and van der Wege, M.M. The effects of information scent on visual search in the hyperbolic tree browser. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 10, 1 (2003), 20--53.
[8]
Sarvas, R., Viikari, M., Pesonen, J., and Nevanlinna, H., MobShare: Controlled and immediate sharing of mobile images. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MULTIMEDIA '04), (New York, NY, 2004).
[9]
Schweiger, W. and Quiring, O. User-generated content on mass media web sites: Just a kind of interactivity or something completely different? In Proceedings of the ICA, NY, 2005.
[10]
Shneiderman, B., Bederson, B.B., and Drucker, S.M. Find photo!: Interface strategies to annotate, browse, and share. Comm. ACM 49, 4 (Apr. 2006), 69--71.
[11]
St. Arnaud, B., Most Significant Economic Challenge to the Future of the Internet. In Proceedings of the NSF/OECD Workshop Social&Economic Factors Shaping the Future of the Internet, (Washington, D.C., 2007).
[12]
Toms, E.G. Understanding and facilitating the browsing of electronic text. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52, 3 (2000), 423--452.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Quasi-experimental quality evaluation of educational-purposed user-generated contents under a stochastic multi-criteria environmentApplied Artificial Intelligence10.1080/08839514.2024.238950138:1Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2022)A systematic literature review of mobile application usability: addressing the design perspectiveUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-022-00903-w22:3(715-735)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2022
  • (2019)Development of an Augmented Reality Tour Guide for a Cultural Heritage SiteJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/331755212:4(1-24)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 53, Issue 1
Amir Pnueli: Ahead of His Time
January 2010
142 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/1629175
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 January 2010
Published in CACM Volume 53, Issue 1

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Popular
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)214
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)38
Reflects downloads up to 03 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Quasi-experimental quality evaluation of educational-purposed user-generated contents under a stochastic multi-criteria environmentApplied Artificial Intelligence10.1080/08839514.2024.238950138:1Online publication date: 25-Aug-2024
  • (2022)A systematic literature review of mobile application usability: addressing the design perspectiveUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-022-00903-w22:3(715-735)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2022
  • (2019)Development of an Augmented Reality Tour Guide for a Cultural Heritage SiteJournal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10.1145/331755212:4(1-24)Online publication date: 17-Nov-2019
  • (2019)Cross-Device TaxonomyProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3290605.3300792(1-28)Online publication date: 2-May-2019
  • (2019)Usability Elements in Digital Textbook Development: A Systematic ReviewPublishing Research Quarterly10.1007/s12109-019-09675-3Online publication date: 13-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Usability Attributes for Mobile Applications: A Systematic ReviewRecent Trends and Advances in Wireless and IoT-enabled Networks10.1007/978-3-319-99966-1_5(53-62)Online publication date: 23-Jan-2019
  • (2018)Branded App Usability: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Prediction of Consumer LoyaltyJournal of Advertising10.1080/00913367.2017.140575547:1(70-82)Online publication date: 15-Feb-2018
  • (2016)The effect of benefits generated from interacting with branded mobile apps on consumer satisfaction and purchase intentionsJournal of Retailing and Consumer Services10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.04.00431(313-322)Online publication date: Jul-2016
  • (2016)Leveraging Microsoft's mobile usability guidelinesInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.02.00189:C(35-53)Online publication date: 1-May-2016
  • (2015)Mobile application usabilityMIS Quarterly10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.0839:2(435-472)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media