skip to main content
10.1145/1629826.1629872acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conception de l'interaction homme-machine et partage d'autorité: application aux systèmes de drones

Published: 13 October 2009 Publication History

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic method for designing the Human-Computer Interaction for a variety of contexts. Elaborated for future Unhabited Air Systems (UAS), this method is based on the "authority sharing" concept (tasks allocation dynamically between the user and the computer system). Most of UAS consider only two modes for controlling and commanding the air vehicles: "full manual" or "full automatic". Several modes in-between can be defined. These modes, called "operative modes", are implemented in the system and activated depending on the evolutions of the context (e.g. breakdown management, dynamic re-planning or an increasing workload). Our method is the result of a classic task analysis for the HCI design and an analysis of the user/automaton capabilities ensuing from the automation domain. This paper details this method applied to a real use-case based on a feedback from past experience on the trajectory management in UAS.

References

[1]
Asencio, M. L'utilisation civile des drones -- problèmes techniques, opérationnels et juridiques. Note de la Fondation pour la Recherche Stratégique n°08, 2008.
[2]
Bastien, J. M. C.&Scapin, D. L. Critèères Ergonomiques pour l'Évaluation d'Interfaces Utilisateurs (version 2.1). Technical report Ndeg. 156, 1993. INRIA. Programme 3 Artificial intelligence, cognitive systems, and man-machine interaction, 1993.
[3]
Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Designing Interaction, not Interfaces. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI'04, ACM Press, Gallipoli (LE), Italy, 2004, pp. 15--21.
[4]
Billings, C. Aviation automation: The search for a human-centred approach. Mahwah, NJ, Erlbraum, 1997.
[5]
Boyd J. R. The Essence of Winning and Losing, http://www.defenseand-society.org/fcs/ppt/boyds_ooda_loop.ppt, 1996.
[6]
Diaper, D., Stanton, N. The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2004.
[7]
Endsley, M., Kiris, E. The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control inautomation. Human Factors, 37. pp. 381--394, 1995.
[8]
Fabiani, P. L'autonomie décisionnelle des Systèmes de drones: pour demain? Présentation au sénat du projet RESSAC, 2002.
[9]
Goosens, A. A. H. E. et al. Exploring Autonomy and Authority Issues with Respect to Conflict Prediction and Resolution. In Human Factors of Uninhabited Military Vehicles as Force Multipliers, Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-HFM-135, Paper 3, Neuillysur-Seine, France, 2006.
[10]
Hou, M., Kobierski, R., Herdman, C. Design and Evaluation of Intelligent Adaptive Operator Interfaces for the Control of Multiple UAVs. In Human Factors of Uninhabited Military Vehicles as Force Multipliers, Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-HFM-135, Paper 8, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, 2006.
[11]
Kaber, D., Omal, E., Endsley, M. Level of automation effects on telerobot performance and human operator situation awareness and subjective workload. In Automation technology and human performance: Current research and trends, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbraum, 1999, pp. 165--170.
[12]
Legras, F. Etat de l'art du partage d'autorité Humain-Multi-Robot. Collection des Rapports de Recherche de l'ENST Bretagne, RR-2007004-LUSSI, 2007.
[13]
Mercier, S., Dehais, F., Lesire, C., Tessier, C. Resources as basic concepts for authority sharing. Humans Operating Unmanned Systems (HUMOUS'08), Brest, 2008.
[14]
Miller, C. A. et al. Implications of Adaptive vs. Adaptable UIs on Decision Making: Why "Automated Adaptiveness" is Not Always the Right Answer. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Augmented Cognition, Las Vegas, NV; 2005, pp. 22--25.
[15]
Mori, G., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., CTTE: Support for Developing and Analyzing Task Models for Interactive System Design. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 28(8), 2002, p. 797--813.
[16]
Nielsen, J., and Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces, Proc. ACM CHI'90 Conf. (Seattle, WA, 1--5 April), 249--256.
[17]
Norman D. A. The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books, 1988.
[18]
Parasuraman, T. et al. Performance consequences of information-induced complacency. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3: pp. 1--23, 1993.
[19]
Parasuraman, T., Sheridan, T., Wickens, C. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: System and Humans, 30(3), 2000.
[20]
Proud, R. W., Hart, J. J., Mrozinski, R. B. Methods for Detrmining the Level of Autonomy to Design into a Human Spaceflight Vehicle: A function Specific Approach. In Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, CASOS, Pittsburgh, USA, 2003.
[21]
Rasmussen J. Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction. New York: North Holland, 1986.
[22]
Sheridan, T., Verplank, W. Human and computer control of undersea teleoperators. Technical Report, MIT Man-Machine Systems Laboratory, 1978.
[23]
Wickens, C., Gordon, S., Liu, Y. An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering. Longman, New York, 1998.

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Simplex design for complex operationsProceedings of the 15th Ergo'IA "Ergonomie Et Informatique Avancée" Conference10.1145/3050385.3050405(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2016
  • (2013)Frameworks for supervisory controlJournal of Human-Robot Interaction10.5898/JHRI.1.2.Miller1:2(183-200)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2013

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
IHM '09: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine
October 2009
354 pages
ISBN:9781605584614
DOI:10.1145/1629826
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 October 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. HCI engineering
  2. adaptive interfaces
  3. task modelling and analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

IHM '09

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 103 of 199 submissions, 52%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2016)Simplex design for complex operationsProceedings of the 15th Ergo'IA "Ergonomie Et Informatique Avancée" Conference10.1145/3050385.3050405(1-8)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2016
  • (2013)Frameworks for supervisory controlJournal of Human-Robot Interaction10.5898/JHRI.1.2.Miller1:2(183-200)Online publication date: 28-Jan-2013

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media