skip to main content
10.1145/1639642.1639654acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

TextSL: a command-based virtual world interface for the visually impaired

Published:25 October 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The immersive graphics, large amount of user-generated content, and social interaction opportunities offered by popular virtual worlds, such as Second Life, could eventually make for a more interactive and informative World Wide Web. Unfortunately, virtual worlds are currently not accessible to users who are visually impaired. This paper presents the work on developing TextSL, a client for Second life that can be accessed with a screen reader. Users interact with TextSL using a command-based interface, which allows for performing a plethora of different actions on large numbers of objects and avatars; characterizing features of such virtual worlds. User studies confirm that a command-based interface is a feasible approach towards making virtual worlds accessible, as it allows screen reader users to explore Second Life, communicate with other avatars, and interact with objects as well as sighted users. Command-based exploration and object interaction is significantly slower, but communication can be performed with the same efficiency as in the Second Life viewer. We further identify that at least 31% of the objects in Second Life lack a descriptive name, which is a significant barrier towards making virtual worlds accessible to users who are visually impaired.

References

  1. Blizzard studios, world of warcraft, http://www.worldofwarcraft.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Eductional uses of second life.http://sleducation.wikispaces.com/educationaluses.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ibm human ability and accessibility center, virtual worlds user interface for the blind, http://services.alphaworks.ibm.com/virtualworlds/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. lib second life, http://libsecondlife.sourceforge.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Linden research, secondlife, http://www.secondlife.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Second life economic statistics, http://secondlife.com/whatis/economy_stats.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Second life region statistics, http://stats.slbuzz.com/sims/browse/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Virtual guide dog project, http://virtualguidedog.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. American foundation for the blind (2002), statistics and sources for professionals, http://www.afb.org/info_document_view.asp?documentid=1367. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Blizzard entertainment, world of warcraft hits 10 million subscribers,http://www.blizzard.com/us/press/080122.html, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gma games, shades of doom,http://www.gmagames.com/sod.html, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Naughty auties' battle autism with virtual interaction, http://www.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/conditions/03/28/sl.autism.irpt/index.html, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Virtual ability, http://virtualability.org, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Abrahams. Second life class action, http://www.it-analysis.com/blogs/Abrahams_Accessibility/2006/11/second_life_class_action.html. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. T. Atkinson, S. Gucukoglu, C. H. C. Machin, and A. E. Lawrence. Making the mainstream accessible: redefining the game. In sandbox '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Videogames, pages 21--28, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. P. Bigham. Increasing web accessibility by automatically judging alternative text quality. In IUI '07: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 349--352, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. M. Blattner, D. A. Sumikawa, and R. M. Greenberg. Earcons and icons: Their structure and common design principles (abstract only). SIGCHI Bull., 21(1):123--124, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W. S. Carter and G. D. Corona. Exploring methods of accessing virtual worlds. American Foundation for the Blind AccessWorld. 9(2), 9(2), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P. Curtis and D. A. Nichols. MUDs grow up: Social virtual reality in the real world. In COMPCON, pages 193--200, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. Dickey. Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: two case studies of active worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3):439--451.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. M. Griffiths, M. Davies, and D. Chappell. Breaking the stereotype: The case of online gaming. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 6(1):81--91, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. T. Hedgpeth, J. John A. Black, and S. Panchanathan. A demonstration of the icare portable reader. In Assets '06: Proc. of the 8th int. ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, pages 279--280, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Kirkpatrick. No, second life is not overhyped, http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/09/technology/fastforward/secondlife.fortune/index.htm, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Nielsen. Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Pascale, S. Mulatto, and D. Prattichizzo. Bringing haptics to second life for visually impaired people. In EuroHaptics '08: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Haptics, pages 896--905, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. H. Petrie, F. Hamilton, N. King, and P. Pavan. Remote usability evaluations with disabled people. In CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 1133--1141, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. D. Rina and J. Pearl. Generalized best-first search strategies and the optimality of a*. Journal of the ACM, 32(3):505--536, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. S. Robbins. Immersion and engagement in a virtual classroom: Using second life for higher education. In EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative Spring 2007 Focus Session, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. B. Robinson and L. J. Lieberman. Effects of visual impairment, gender, and age on self-determination. Journal of Visual Impairment&Blindness, 98:351--366, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. A. Talamasca. The heron sanctuary helps the disabled find a second, http://eurekadejavu.blogspot.com/2008/01/story-of-heron-sanctuary.html, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. S. Trewin, V. Hanson, M. Laff, and A. Cavender. Powerup: An accessible virtual world. In Assets '08: Proc. of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, pages 171--178, New York, NY, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. U.S.Government. 1998 amendment to section 508 of the rehabilitation act. SEC. 508. Electronic and information Technology, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. L. von Ahn, S. Ginosar, M. Kedia, R. Liu, and M. Blum. Improving accessibility of the web with a computer game. In CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, pages 79--82, New York, NY, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. T. Westin. Game accessibility case study: Terraformers - a realtime 3d graphic game. In Proc. of the The Fifth Int. Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. G. R. White, G. Fitzpatrick, and G. McAllister. Toward accessible 3d virtual environments for the blind and visually impaired. In DIMEA '08: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, pages 134--141, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. TextSL: a command-based virtual world interface for the visually impaired

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        Assets '09: Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
        October 2009
        290 pages
        ISBN:9781605585581
        DOI:10.1145/1639642

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 October 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader