skip to main content
10.1145/1639642.1639663acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities

Published:25 October 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile devices provide people with disabilities new opportunities to act independently in the world. However, these empowering devices have their own accessibility challenges. We present a formative study that examines how people with visual and motor disabilities select, adapt, and use mobile devices in their daily lives. We interviewed 20 participants with visual and motor disabilities and asked about their current use of mobile devices, including how they select them, how they use them while away from home, and how they adapt to accessibility challenges when on the go. Following the interviews, 19 participants completed a diary study in which they recorded their experiences using mobile devices for one week. Our results show that people with visual and motor disabilities use a variety of strategies to adapt inaccessible mobile devices and successfully use them to perform everyday tasks and navigate independently. We provide guidelines for more accessible and empowering mobile device design.

References

  1. Abascal, J. and Civit, A. (2000) Mobile communication for people with disabilities and older people: New opportunities for autonomous life. Proceedings of the 6th ERCIM Workshop, 255--268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnard, L., Yi, J. S., Jacko, J.A. and Sears, A. (2007) Capturing the effects of context on human performance in mobile computing systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11 (2), 81--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bhachu, A.S., Hine, N. and Arnott, J. (2008) Technology devices for older adults to aid self management of chronic health conditions. Proc. ASSETS '08. New York: ACM Press, 59--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Brandt, J., Weiss, N. and Klemmer, S.R. (2007) txt 4 l8r: lowering the burden for diary studies under mobile conditions. CHI '07 Extended Abstracts. New York: ACM Press, 2303--2308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Consolvo, S. and Walker, M. (2003) Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications. Pervasive Computing, 2 (2), 24--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dawe, M. (2006) Desperately seeking simplicity: How young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. Proc. CHI '06. New York: ACM Press, 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dawe, M. (2007) Understanding mobile phone requirements for young adults with cognitive disabilities. Proc. ASSETS '07. New York: ACM Press, 179--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Horrigan, J. (2009) The mobile difference. Pew Internet&American Life Project.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kane, S.K. (2009) Context-enhanced interaction techniques for more accessible mobile phones. SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, 93, 39--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kane, S.K., Bigham, J.P. and Wobbrock, J.O. (2008) Slide Rule: Making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. Proc. ASSETS '08. New York: ACM Press, 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kurniawan, S. (2008) Older people and mobile phones: A multi-method investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66 (12), 889--901. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Leonard, V.K., Jacko, J. and Pizzimenti, J.J. (2005) An exploratory investigation of handheld computer interaction for older adults with visual impairments. Proc. ASSETS '05. New York: ACM Press, 12--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lin, M., Goldman, R., Price, K. J., Sears, A. and Jacko, J. (2007) How do people tap when walking? An empirical investigation of nomadic data entry. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65 (9), 759--769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Manduchi, R. and Coughlan, J. (2008) Portable and mobile systems in assistive technology. Proc. ICCHP '08. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1078--1080. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Massimi, M., Baecker, R. and Wu, M. (2007) Using participatory activities with seniors to critique, build, and evaluate mobile phones. Proc. ASSETS '07. New York: ACM Press, 155--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mizobuchi, S., Chignell, M. and Newton, D. (2005) Mobile text entry: relationship between walking speed and text input task difficulty. Proc. MobileHCI '05. New York: ACM Press, 122--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mustonen, T., Olkkonen, M. and Hakkinen, J. (2004) Examining mobile phone text legibility while walking. CHI '04 Extended Abstracts. New York: ACM Press, 1243--1246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Palen, L. and Hughes, A. (2007) When home base is not a place: parents' use of mobile telephones. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11 (5), 339--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Palen, L. and Salzman, M. (2002) Voice-mail diary studies for naturalistic data capture under mobile conditions. Proc. CSCW '02. New York: ACM Press, 87--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Pascoe, J., Ryan, N. and Morse, D. (2000) Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7 (3), 417--437. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Phillips, B. and Zhao, H. (1993) Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA, 5 (1), 36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Plos, O. and Buisine, S. (2006) Universal design for mobile phones: A case study. CHI '06 Extended Abstracts, 1229--1234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sears, A., Lin, M., Jacko, J. and Xiao, Y. (2003) When computers fade: Pervasive computing and situationally-induced impairments and disabilities. Proc. HCI International '03. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1298--1302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Silfverberg, M. (2003) Using mobile keypads with limited visual feedback: implications to handheld and wearable devices. Proc. MobileHCI '03. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 76--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Sohn, T., Li, K. A., Griswold, W.G. and Hollan, J.D. (2008) A diary study of mobile information needs. Proc. CHI '08. New York: ACM Press, 433--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomioka, K., Kato, S. and Mooney, A. (2002) A study on accessibility of cellular phones for users with disabilities. Proc. Universal Design Japan Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Watanabe, T., Miyagi, M., Minatani, K. and Nagaoka, H. (2008) A survey on the use of mobile phones by visually impaired persons in Japan. Proc. ICCHP '08. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1081--1084. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wobbrock, J.O. (2006) The future of mobile device research in HCI. CHI '06 Workshop Proceedings: What is the Next Generation of Human-Computer Interaction?, 131--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wobbrock, J.O., Forlizzi, J., Hudson, S. E. and Myers, B. A. (2002) WebThumb: interaction techniques for small-screen browsers. Proc. UIST '02. New York: ACM Press, 205--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              Assets '09: Proceedings of the 11th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
              October 2009
              290 pages
              ISBN:9781605585581
              DOI:10.1145/1639642

              Copyright © 2009 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 25 October 2009

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader