skip to main content
research-article

Using stuck-at tests to form scan-based tests for transition faults in standard-scan circuits

Published: 28 December 2009 Publication History

Abstract

In enhanced-scan circuits, a two-pattern test < ti, tj > for a transition fault can be obtained by using a test tj that detects a stuck-at fault, and preceding it by a test ti that activates another stuck-at fault. Thus, test generation for transition faults can be done by combining pairs of stuck-at tests. This provides an alternative to deterministic test generation, as well as reduces the test storage requirements for transition fault tests. We study the possibility of generating scan-based tests for transition faults in standard-scan circuits in a similar way, by combining pairs of stuck-at tests. Since it is not always possible to obtain a standard-scan test that is equivalent to a two-pattern test < ti, tj > based on stuck-at tests ti and tj, it is not always possible to guarantee that the combination of ti and tj will detect a transition fault. To compensate for this, it is necessary to try combinations of different stuck-at test pairs, resulting in an increased simulation effort to compute effective standard-scan tests. Our focus in this work is on reducing this simulation effort by reducing the number of stuck-at test pairs that need to be considered.

References

[1]
Barzilai, Z. and Rosen, B. 1983. Comparison of AC self-testing procedures. In Proceedings of the International Test Conference. 89--94.
[2]
Benware, B., Schuermyer, C., Tamarapalli, N., Tsai, K .-H., Ranganathan, S., Madge, R., Rajski, J., and Krishnamurthy, P. 2003. Impact of multiple-detect test patterns on product quality. In Proceedings of the International Test Conference. 1031--1040.
[3]
Chakravarty, S. and Ravi, S. S. 1990. Computing optimal test sequences from complete test sets for stuck-open faults in CMOS circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aid. Des. 329--331.
[4]
Chandramouli, R. 1983. On testing stuck-open faults. In Proceedings of the Fault-Tolerant Computing Symposium. 258--265.
[5]
Dasgupta, S., Walther, R. G., Williams, T. W., and Eichelberger, E. B. 1981. An enhancement to LSSD and some applications of LSSD in reliability, availability and serviceability. In Proceedings of the Fault-Tolerant Computing Symposium. 880--885.
[6]
Geuzebroek, J., Marinissen, E. J., Majhi, A., Glowatz, A., and Hapke, F. 2007. Embedded multi-detect ATPG and its effect on the detection of unmodeled defects. In Proceedings of the International Test Conference.
[7]
Kundu, S., Reddy, S. M., and Jha, N. K. 1991. Design of robustly testable combinational logic circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aid. Des. 1036--1048.
[8]
Lee, H. K. and Ha, D. S. 1990. SOPRANO: An efficient automatic test pattern generator for stuck-open faults in CMOS combinational circuits. In Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference. 660--666.
[9]
Li, W., Reddy, S. M., and Pomeranz, I. 2004. On test generation for transition faults with minimized peak power dissipation. In Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference. 504--509.
[10]
Liu, X., Hsiao, M. S., Chakravarty, S., and Thadikaran, P. J. 2002. Novel ATPG algorithms for transition faults. In Proceedings of the European Test Workshop. 47--52.
[11]
Pomeranz, I. and Reddy, S. M. 1998. Static test compaction for scan-based designs to reduce test application time. In Proceedings of the Asian Test Symposium. 198--203.
[12]
Pomeranz, I., and Reddy, S. M. 2001. Forward-looking fault simulation for improved static compaction. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aid. Des. 1262--1265.
[13]
Savir, J. and Patil, S. 1993. Scan-based transition test. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aid. Des. 1232--1241.
[14]
Savir, J. and Patil, S. 1994. Broad-side delay test. IEEE Trans. Comput.-Aid. Des. 1057--1064.
[15]
Venkataraman, S., Sivaraj, S., Amyeen, E., Lee, S., Ojha, A., and Guo, R. 2004. An experimental study of n-detect scan ATPG patterns on a processor. In Proceedings of the VLSI Test Symposium. 23--28.
[16]
Waicukauski, J., Lindbloom, E., Rosen, B., and Iyengar, V. 1987. Transition fault simulation. IEEE Des. Test, 32--38.

Index Terms

  1. Using stuck-at tests to form scan-based tests for transition faults in standard-scan circuits

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems
      ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems  Volume 15, Issue 1
      December 2009
      188 pages
      ISSN:1084-4309
      EISSN:1557-7309
      DOI:10.1145/1640457
      Issue’s Table of Contents
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Journal Family

      Publication History

      Published: 28 December 2009
      Accepted: 01 September 2009
      Revised: 01 February 2009
      Received: 01 July 2008
      Published in TODAES Volume 15, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Broadside tests
      2. scan circuits
      3. skewed-load tests
      4. stuck-at faults
      5. transition faults

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

      Funding Sources

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 160
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media