skip to main content
10.1145/164360.164419acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Solving polynomial systems for curve, surface and solid modeling

Published:01 June 1993Publication History
First page image

References

  1. ABB+92.E. Anderson, Z. Bai, C. Bischof, J. Demmel, J. Dongarra, J. Du Cruz, A. Greenbaum, S. Hammarling, and D. Sorensen. LA ira CK User's Guide, Release 1.0. SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. AS86.W. Auzinger and H.J. Stetter. An elimination algorithm for the computation of all zeros of a system of multivariate polynomial equations. In International Series of Numerical Mathematics, volume 86, pages 11-30, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BDM89.Z. Bai, J. Demmel, and A. McKenney. On the conditioning of the nonsymmetric eigenproblem: Theory and software. Computer Science Dept. Technical Report 469, Courant Institute, New York, NY, October 1989. (LA- PACK Working Note # 13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ber75.D.N. Bernshtein. The number of roots of a system of equations. Funktsional'nyi A noliz i Ego Prilozheniila, 9(3):1-4, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. BGW88.C. Bajaj, T. Garrity, and J. Warren. On the applications of multi-equational resultants. Technical Report CSD-TR-826, Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Can88.J.F. Canny. The Complexity of Robot Motion Planning. ACM Doctoral Dissertation Award. MIT Press, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. CE93.J. Canny and I. Emiris. An efficient algoritllm for the sparse mixed resultant. In Proceedings o.f AAECC, 1993. To appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cra89.J.J. Craig. Introduction to Robotics" Mechanics and Control. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dix08.A.L. Dixon. The eliminant of three qualities in two independent variables. Proceedings of London Mathematical Society, 6:49-69, 209-236, 1908.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. GKZ90.I.M. Gelfand, M.M. Kapranov, and A.V. Zelevinsky. Newton polytopes of the cl.x~sical resultant and discriminant. Advances in Mathematics, 84:237-254, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. GL89.G.H. Golub and C.F. Van Loan. Matrix Computations. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. GLR82.I. Gohberg, P. Lancaster, and L. R odman. Matrix Polynomials. Academic Press, New York, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gol91.D. Goldberg. What every computer scientist should know about floating point arithmetic. ACM Computing Surveys, 23(1):5-48, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hof89.C.M. Hoffmann. Geometric and Solid ~llodeling. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, California, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hof90.C.M. Hoffmann. A dimensionality paradigm for surface interrogations. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 7:517-532, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kaj82.J. Kajiya. Ray tracing parametric patches. Computer Graphics, 16(3):245--254, 1982. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kra91.G.A. Kramer. Using degrees of freedom analysis to solve geometric constraint system. In Proceedings o/SI/mposium on Solid Modeling Foundationz and CAD/CAM Applications, pages 37'1-378, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. LBD+92.D. Lavender, A. Bowyer, J. Davenport, A. Wallis, and J. Woodwark. Voronoi diagrams of set-theoretic solid models. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, pages 69-77, September 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mac02.F.S. Macaulay. On some formula in elimination. Proceedings ojf London Mathematical Society, pages 3-27, May 1902.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Man92.D. Manocha. Algebraic and Numeric Techniques .{or Modeling and Robotics. PhD thesis, Computer Science Division, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, May 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. MC27.F. Morley and A.B. Cable. New results in elimination. American Journal of Mathematics, 49:463-488, 1927.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. MC91.D. Manocha and J.F. Canny. A new approach for surface intersection. International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications, 1(4):491--516, 1991. Special issue on Solid Modeling.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. MD92.D. Manocha and J. Demmel. Algorithms for intersecting parametric and algebraic curves. In Graphics Interlace '9~, pages 232-241, 1992. Also available as technical report UCB/CSD 92/698, Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mor92.A.P. Morgan. Polynomial continuation and its relationship to the symbolic reduction of polynomial systems. In Symbolic and Numerical Computation for Artificial Intelligence, pages 23-45, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. NSK90.T. Nishita, T.W. Sederberg, and M. Kakimoto. Ray tracing trimmed rational sudace patches. Computer Graphics, 24(4):337-345, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Owe91.J.C. Owen. Algebraic solution for geometry from dimensional constraints. In Proceedings of Symposium on Solid Modeling Foundations and CAD/CAM Applications, pages 397-407, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. RR92.A.A.G. Requicha and J.R. Rossignac. Solid modeling and beyond. IEEE Computer Graph. ics and Applications, pages 31-44, September 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sal85.G. Salmon. Lessons lntroducto~ to the Modern Higher Algebra. G.E. Stechert & Co., New York, 1885.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sed83.T.W. Sederberg. Implicit and Parametric Curves and Surfaces. PhD thesis, Purdue University, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. SP86.T.W. Sederberg and S.R. Parry. Comparison of three curve intersection algorithms. Computer.Aided Design, 18(1):58--63, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Ste76.G.W. Stewaxt. Simultaneous iteration for computing invaxiant subspaces of non-hermitian m~trices. Numerische Mathematik, 25:123- 136, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Stu91.B. Sturmfels. Spaxse elimination theory. In D. Eisenbud and L. Robbiano, editors, Compu. tational Algebraic Geomet~ and Commutative Algebra. Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. SZ92.B. Sturmfels and A. Zelevinsky. Multigraded resultants of sylvester type. Journal of Algebra, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wil59.J.H. Wilkinson. The evaluation of the zeros of ill-conditioned polynomials, parts i and ii. Numer. Math., 1:150-166 and 167-180, 1959.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Solving polynomial systems for curve, surface and solid modeling

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SMA '93: Proceedings on the second ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications
          June 1993
          498 pages
          ISBN:0897915844
          DOI:10.1145/164360

          Copyright © 1993 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 June 1993

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate86of173submissions,50%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader