skip to main content
10.1145/1645953.1645988acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adaptive relevance feedback in information retrieval

Published: 02 November 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Relevance Feedback has proven very effective for improving retrieval accuracy. A difficult yet important problem in all relevance feedback methods is how to optimally balance the original query and feedback information. In the current feedback methods, the balance parameter is usually set to a fixed value across all the queries and collections. However, due to the difference in queries and feedback documents, this balance parameter should be optimized for each query and each set of feedback documents.
In this paper, we present a learning approach to adaptively predict the optimal balance coefficient for each query and each collection. We propose three heuristics to characterize the balance between query and feedback information. Taking these three heuristics as a road map, we explore a number of features and combine them using a regression approach to predict the balance coefficient. Our experiments show that the proposed adaptive relevance feedback is more robust and effective than the regular fixed-coefficient feedback.

References

[1]
Giambattista Amati, Claudio Carpineto, and Giovanni Romano. Query difficulty, robustness, and selective application of query expansion. In Proceedings of ECIR '04, pages 127--137, 2004.
[2]
Ann Aula. Query formulation in web information search. In Proceedings of ICWI '03, pages 403--410, 2003.
[3]
Chris Buckley and Stephen E. Robertson. Relevance feedback track overview: Trec 2008. In TREC '08, 2008.
[4]
Chris Buckley, Gerard Salton, James Allan, and Amit Singhal. Automatic query expansion using smart: Trec 3. In Proceedings of TREC '94, pages 69--80, 1994.
[5]
Chris Burges, Tal Shaked, Erin Renshaw, Ari Lazier, Matt Deeds, Nicole Hamilton, and Greg Hullender. Learning to rank using gradient descent. In ICML '05: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, pages 89--96, 2005.
[6]
Zhe Cao, Tao Qin, Tie-Yan Liu, Ming-Feng Tsai, and Hang Li. Learning to rank: from pairwise approach to listwise approach. In Proceedings of ICML, pages 129--136, 2007.
[7]
David Carmel, Elad Yom-Tov, Adam Darlow, and Dan Pelleg. What makes a query difficult? In Proceedings of SIGIR '06, pages 390--397, 2006.
[8]
Ben Carterette and Desislava Petkova. Learning a ranking from pairwise preferences. In Proceedings of SIGIR '06, pages 629--630, 2006.
[9]
Charles Clarke, Nick Craswell, and Ian Soboroff. Overview of the trec 2004 terabyte track. In Proceedings of TREC '04, pages 500--261, 2004.
[10]
William S. Cooper, Fredric C. Gey, and Daniel P. Dabney. Probabilistic retrieval based on staged logistic regression. In Proceedings of SIGIR '92, pages 198--210, 1992.
[11]
Stephen Cronen-Townsend, Yun Zhou, and W. Bruce Croft. Predicting query performance. In Proceedings of SIGIR '02, pages 299--306, 2002.
[12]
Stephen Cronen-Townsend, Yun Zhou, and W. Bruce Croft. A framework for selective query expansion. In Proceedings of CIKM '04, pages 236--237, 2004.
[13]
Norbert Fuhr and Chris Buckley. A probabilistic learning approach for document indexing. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 9(3):223--248, 1991.
[14]
Fredric C. Gey. Inferring probability of relevance using the method of logistic regression. In Proceedings of SIGIR '94, pages 222--231, 1994.
[15]
Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome Friedman. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer New York Inc., New York, NY, USA, 2001.
[16]
Claudia Hauff, Djoerd Hiemstra, and Franciska de Jong. A survey of pre-retrieval query performance predictors. In Proceedings of CIKM '08, pages 1419--1420, 2008.
[17]
Ben He and Iadh Ounis. Combining fields for query expansion and adaptive query expansion. Inf. Process. Manage., 43(5):1294--1307, 2007.
[18]
T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the ACM KDD 2002, pages 133--142, 2002.
[19]
Diane Kelly and Jaime Teevan. Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: a bibliography. SIGIR Forum, 37(2):18--28, 2003.
[20]
John D. Lafferty and Chengxiang Zhai. Document language models, query models, and risk minimization for information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR '01, pages 111--119, 2001.
[21]
Victor Lavrenko and W. Bruce Croft. Relevance-based language models. In Proceedings of SIGIR '01, pages 120--127, 2001.
[22]
Jianhua Lin. Divergence measures based on the shannon entropy. IEEE Trans. Infor. Theory, 37:145--151, 1991.
[23]
Yuanhua Lv and ChengXiang Zhai. A comparative study of methods for estimating query language models with pseudo feedback. In Proceedings of CIKM '09, 2009.
[24]
Jay M. Ponte and W. Bruce Croft. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR '98, pages 275--281, 1998.
[25]
Stephen E. Robertson and Karen Sparck Jones. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 27(3):129--146, 1976.
[26]
Stephen E. Robertson, Steve Walker, Susan Jones, Micheline Hancock-Beaulieu, and Mike Gatford. Okapi at trec-3. In TREC '94, pages 109--126, 1994.
[27]
J. J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 313--323. Prentice-Hall Inc., 1971.
[28]
Gerard Salton and Chris Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(4):288--297, 1990.
[29]
Tao Tao and ChengXiang Zhai. Regularized estimation of mixture models for robust pseudo-relevance feedback. In Proceedings of SIGIR '06, pages 162--169, 2006.
[30]
Zuobing Xu and Ram Akella. A bayesian logistic regression model for active relevance feedback. In Proceedings of SIGIR '08, pages 227--234, 2008.
[31]
Elad Yom-Tov, Shai Fine, David Carmel, and Adam Darlow. Learning to estimate query difficulty: including applications to missing content detection and distributed information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR '05, pages 512--519, 2005.
[32]
ChengXiang Zhai and John D. Lafferty. Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval. In Proceedings of CIKM '01, pages 403--410, 2001.
[33]
ChengXiang Zhai and John D. Lafferty. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to ad hoc information retrieval. In Proceedings of SIGIR '01, pages 334--342, 2001.
[34]
Zhaohui Zheng, Keke Chen, Gordon Sun, and Hongyuan Zha. A regression framework for learning ranking functions using relative relevance judgments. In Proceedings of SIGIR '07, pages 287--294, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Deep Learning Approach for Selective Relevance FeedbackAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-56060-6_13(189-204)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Relevance Feedback with Brain SignalsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363787442:4(1-37)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Knowledge maps for large‐scale group decision making in social media content analysisExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.1350942:1Online publication date: 23-Nov-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '09: Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management
November 2009
2162 pages
ISBN:9781605585123
DOI:10.1145/1645953
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 November 2009

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. adaptive relevance feedback
  2. language models
  3. learning
  4. prediction
  5. relevance feedback

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CIKM '09
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A Deep Learning Approach for Selective Relevance FeedbackAdvances in Information Retrieval10.1007/978-3-031-56060-6_13(189-204)Online publication date: 16-Mar-2024
  • (2023)Relevance Feedback with Brain SignalsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/363787442:4(1-37)Online publication date: 18-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Knowledge maps for large‐scale group decision making in social media content analysisExpert Systems10.1111/exsy.1350942:1Online publication date: 23-Nov-2023
  • (2023)An approach of a quantum-inspired document ranking algorithm by using feature selection methodologyInternational Journal of Information Technology10.1007/s41870-023-01543-w15:8(4041-4053)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2023
  • (2022)LoLProceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3477495.3532017(825-836)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2022
  • (2022)Active Learning for Efficient Partial Improvement of Learning to RankFrom Born-Physical to Born-Virtual: Augmenting Intelligence in Digital Libraries10.1007/978-3-031-21756-2_11(135-143)Online publication date: 7-Dec-2022
  • (2021)The Relevance of Feedback Mechanisms to Library Databases in Academic LibrariesDigital Solutions and the Case for Africa’s Sustainable Development10.4018/978-1-7998-2967-6.ch008(116-130)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Pseudo relevance feedback optimizationInformation Retrieval Journal10.1007/s10791-021-09393-5Online publication date: 25-May-2021
  • (2020)Towards Question-based High-recall Information RetrievalACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/338864038:3(1-35)Online publication date: 18-May-2020
  • (2020)An ontology-improved vector space model for semantic retrievalThe Electronic Library10.1108/EL-04-2020-0081ahead-of-print:ahead-of-printOnline publication date: 30-Nov-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media