skip to main content
research-article
Free access

Assessing the changing U.S. IT R&D ecosystem

Published: 01 February 2010 Publication History

Abstract

The National Academy of Sciences recommends what the U.S. government should do to help maintain American IT leadership.

References

[1]
Assessing the Impacts of Changes in the Information Technology R&D Ecosystem: Retaining Leadership in an Increasingly Global Environment. national Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2009; http://www. nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12174
[2]
Computing the Future: A Broader Agenda for Computer Science and Engineering. national Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 1992; http://www.nap.edu/catalog. php?record_id=1982
[3]
Funding a Revolution: Government Support for Computing Research. national Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 1999; http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_ id=6323
[4]
Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2008; http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_ id=11463

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Communications of the ACM
Communications of the ACM  Volume 53, Issue 2
February 2010
147 pages
ISSN:0001-0782
EISSN:1557-7317
DOI:10.1145/1646353
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 February 2010
Published in CACM Volume 53, Issue 2

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Popular
  • Refereed

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)86
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)13
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Digital Edition

View this article in digital edition.

Digital Edition

Magazine Site

View this article on the magazine site (external)

Magazine Site

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media