skip to main content
10.1145/1653771.1653789acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The global network of outdoor webcams: properties and applications

Published:04 November 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

There are thousands of outdoor webcams which offer live images freely over the Internet. We report on methods for discovering and organizing this already existing and massively distributed global sensor, and argue that it provides an interesting alternative to satellite imagery for global-scale remote sensing applications. In particular, we characterize the live imaging capabilities that are freely available as of the summer of 2009 in terms of the spatial distribution of the cameras, their update rate, and characteristics of the scene in view. We offer algorithms that exploit the fact that webcams are typically static to simplify the tasks of inferring relevant environmental and weather variables directly from image data. Finally, we show that organizing and exploiting the large, ad-hoc, set of cameras attached to the web can dramatically increase the data available for studying particular problems in phenology.

References

  1. E. Bradley, D. Roberts, and C. Still. Design of an image analysis website for phenological and meteorological monitoring. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2009 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. Brand. Incremental singular value decomposition of uncertain data with missing values. In Proceedings European Conference on Computer Vision, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Cho and H. Garcia-Molina. Estimating frequency of change. ACM Trans. Internet Technology, 3(3):256--290, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Haze Cam Pollution Visibility Camera Network. http://www.hazecam.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Holman, J. Stanley, and T. Ozkan-Haller. Applying video sensor networks to nearshore environment monitoring. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2(4):14--21, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. D. Hopkins. Periodical events and natural law as guides to agricultural research and practice. Monthly Weather Review. Supplement No. 9, pages 1--42, 1918.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. H. Hotelling. Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika, 28:321--377, 1936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. IPInfoDB. http://www.ipinfodb.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. J., A. García-Olivares, E. Ojeda, A. Osorio, O. Chic, and R. Gonzalez. Long-Term Quantification of Beach Users Using Video Monitoring. Journal of Coastal Research, 24(6):1612--1619, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Jacobs, W. Burgin, R. Speyer, D. Ross, and R. Pless. Adventures in archiving and using three years of webcam images. In Proceedings IEEE CVPR Workshop on Internet Vision, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. N. Jacobs, N. Roman, and R. Pless. Consistent temporal variations in many outdoor scenes. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. N. Jacobs, N. Roman, and R. Pless. Toward fully automatic geo-location and geo-orientation of static outdoor cameras. In Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Jacobs, S. Satkin, N. Roman, R. Speyer, and R. Pless. Geolocating static cameras. In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. M. Kammler and G. Schernewski. Spatial and temporal analysis of beach tourism using webcam and aerial photographs. In G. Schernewski and N. Löser, editors, Managing the Baltic Sea: Coastline Reports. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. J. Kim, J.-M. Frahm, and M. Pollefeys. Radiometric calibration with illumination change for outdoor scene analysis. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. S. J. Koppal and S. G. Narasimhan. Clustering appearance for scene analysis. In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J.-F. Lalonde, S. G. Narasimhan, and A. A. Efros. What does the sky tell us about the camera? In Proceedings European Conference on Computer Vision, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Moreno. The role of weather in beach recreation---a case study using webcam images. In A. Matzarakis, C. R. de Freitas, and D. Scott, editors, Developments in Tourism Climatology. International Society of Biometeorology: Commission on Climate, Tourism and Recreation, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. T. Morisette, A. D. Richardson, A. K. Knapp, J. I. Fisher, E. A. Graham, J. Abatzoglou, B. E. Wilson, D. D. Breshears, G. M. Henebry, J. M. Hanes, and L. Liang. Tracking the rhythm of the seasons in the face of global change: phenological research in the 21st century. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(5):253--260, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. G. Narasimhan, C. Wang, and S. K. Nayar. All the images of an outdoor scene. In Proceedings European Conference on Computer Vision, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. National Climatic Data Center. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Opentopia Webcams. http://www.opentopia.com/hiddencam.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Parry, O. Canziani, J. Palutikof, P. van der Linden, and C. Hanson, editors. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. PhenoCam. http://phenocam.unh.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Phenological Eyes Network. http://pen.agbi.tsukuba.ac.jp/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. A. D. Richardson, B. H. Braswell, D. Y. Hollinger, J. P. Jenkins, and S. V. Ollinger. Near-surface remote sensing of spatial and temporal variation in canopy phenology. Ecological Applications, 19(6): 1417--1428, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. A. D. Richardson, J. P. Jenkins, B. H. Braswell, D. Y. Hollinger, S. V. Ollinger, and M.-L. Smith. Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Oecologia, 152(2), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. K. Sunkavalli, W. Matusik, H. Pfister, and S. Rusinkiewicz. Factored time-lapse video. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 26(3), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. K. Sunkavalli, F. Romeiro, W. Matusik, T. Zickler, and H. Pfister. What do color changes reveal about an outdoor scene? In Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Weather Underground. http://www.wunderground.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Weatherbug Inc. http://weatherbugmedia.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. C. J. Wong, M. Z. MatJafri, K. Abdullah, and H. S. Lim. Temporal and spatial air quality monitoring using internet surveillance camera and alos satellite image. In Proceedings IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. C. J. Wong, M. Z. MatJafri, K. Abdullah, H. S. Lim, and K. L. Low. Temporal air quality monitoring using internet surveillance camera and alos satellite image. In Proceedings IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. L. Xie, A. Chiu, and S. Newsam. Estimating atmospheric visibility using general-purpose cameras. In Proceedings International Symposium on Advances in Visual Computing, pages 356--367, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. X. Zhang, M. A. Friedl, C. B. Schaaf, A. H. Strahler, J. C. F. Hodges, F. Gao, B. C. Reed, and A. Huete. Monitoring vegetation phenology using modis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 84:471--475, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The global network of outdoor webcams: properties and applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GIS '09: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2009
      575 pages
      ISBN:9781605586496
      DOI:10.1145/1653771

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 November 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader