skip to main content
10.1145/1655260.1655262acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating emotional algorithms using psychological scales

Published: 06 November 2009 Publication History

Abstract

Evaluating the effectiveness of emotional algorithms is a challenge in the research of affective computing. This paper presents an evaluation method using psychological scales. Affective interfaces and artifacts generated by different emotional algorithms are regarded as the external stimuli, while users' feelings are regarded as subjective evaluations. Psychophysical methods, such as the Scheffe method of paired comparison, are adopted to measure users' feelings and obtain a psychological scale. Thus objects generated by different algorithms can be compared on this psychological scale. The higher the value, the better the algorithm is. Empirical studies on three kinds of emotional algorithms, namely emotional image retrieval, emotional speech synthesis, and emotional music generation, are used to illustrate various uses of our approach and how it may be applied to evaluating affective interaction and user-centered design.

References

[1]
R. W. Picard. Affective Computing. MIT Press, 1997.
[2]
K. Isbister and K. Höök. Evaluating affective interfaces: innovative approaches. In CHI '05: CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 2119--2119, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
[3]
K. Isbister and K. Höök. Evaluating affective interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4):273--274, 2007.
[4]
N. S. Shami, J. T. Hancock, C. Peter, M. Muller, and R. Mandryk. Measuring affect in hci: going beyond the individual. In CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3901--3904, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
[5]
K. Höök. User-centered design and evaluation of affective interfaces. pages 127--160, 2004.
[6]
C. Wiberg. Affective computing vs. usability? insights of using traditional usability evaluation methods. April 2005.
[7]
N. Chateau and M. Mersiol. Amuse: A tool for evaluating affective interfaces. April 2005.
[8]
D. Fallman and J. Waterworth. Dealing with user experience and affective evaluation in hci design: A repertory grid approach. April 2005.
[9]
R. W. Picard and S. B. Daily. Evaluating affective interactions: Alternatives to asking what users feel. April 2005.
[10]
R. L. Mandryk and M. S. Atkins. A fuzzy physiological approach for continuously modeling emotion during interaction with play technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4):329--347, 2007.
[11]
R. L. Hazlett and J. Benedek. Measuring emotional valence to understand the user's experience of software. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4):306--314, 2007.
[12]
M. Isomursu, M. Tahti, S. Vainamo, and K. Kuutti. Experimental evaluation of five methods for collecting emotions in field settings with mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4):404--418, 2007.
[13]
P. J. Lang. Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications. Albex, Norwood, NJ, 1980.
[14]
P. M. A. Desmet, C. J. Overbeeke, and S. J. E. T. Tax. Designing products with added emotional value: development and application of an approach for research through design. The Design Journal, 4(1):32--47, 2001.
[15]
M. Isomursu, K. Kuutti, and S. Vainamo. Experience clip: method for user participation and evaluation of mobile concepts. In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, pages 83--92, 2004.
[16]
M. Tahti and L. Arhippainen. A proposal of collecting emotions and experiences. Interactive Experiences in HCI, 2:195--198, 2004.
[17]
L. A. Rantakokko and T. M. Tahti. Mobile feedback application for emotion and user experience collection. In Proceedings of PROW 2004, pages 77--81. Helsinki University Press, 2004.
[18]
M. Haringer and S. Beckhaus. Framework for the measurement of affect in interactive experiences and games. 2008.
[19]
S. F. Wang. Emotion semantics image retrieval: An brief overview. In Proceeding of 1st International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, pages 490--497. Springer, 2005.
[20]
Zh. L. Yang. Experimental Psychology. Zhejiang Education Publishing Company, 2002.
[21]
A. Friberg. pdm: An expressive sequencer with real-time control of the kth music-performance rules. Comput. Music J., 30(1):37--48, 2006.
[22]
H. Scheffe. An analysis of variance for paired comparisons. Journal of American Statistical Association, 147(1):381--400, 1952.
[23]
S. F. Wang. Research on Kansei Information Processing and its Application in Image Retrieval. Doctor dissertation, Universtiy of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P.R. China, May 2002.
[24]
J. Cahn. Generating expression in synthesized speech. Master thesis, M.I.T., 1989.
[25]
S. L. Lv, S. F. Wang, and X. F. Wang. Emotional speech synthesis by xml file using interactive genetic algorithms. In GEC Summit, pages 907--910. ACM, 2009.
[26]
H. Zhu, S. F. Wang, and Zh. Wang. Emotional music generation using interactive genetic algorithm. In 2008 International Conference onComputer Science and Software Engineering, pages 345--348, 2008.
[27]
A. Friberg, R. Bresin, and J. Sundberg. Overview of the kth rule system for music performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(1):145--161, 2006.
[28]
M. Wong. Emotion assessment in evaluation of affective interfaces. master thesis, University of Waterloo, 2006.

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating emotional algorithms using psychological scales

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    AFFINE '09: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Affective-Aware Virtual Agents and Social Robots
    November 2009
    47 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 06 November 2009

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Evaluation
    2. emotional algorithm
    3. evaluation method
    4. psychological scales

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ICMI-MLMI '09
    Sponsor:

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 390
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media