skip to main content
10.1145/168304.168307acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescoltConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Learning sparse multivariate polynomials over a field with queries and counterexamples

Published:01 August 1993Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Dana Angluin. Learning regular sets from queries and counterexamples. Information and Computation, 75:87-106, November 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Sigal Ar, Richard J. Lipton, Ronitt Rubinfeld, and Madhu Sudan. Reconstructing algebraic functions from mixed data. In 33rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 503-512, October 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Michael Ben-Or and Prasoon Tiwari. A deterministic algorithm for sparse multivariate polynomial interpolation. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 301-309, May 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Avrim Blum. Learning boolean functions in an infinite attribute space. Machine Learning, 9(4):373-386, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Avrim Blum and Mona Singh. Learning functions of k terms. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pages 144-153, August 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Anselm Blumer, Andrzej Ehrenfeucht, David Haussler, and Manfred K. Warmuth. Learnability and the Vapnik- Chervonenkis dimension. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 36(4):929-965, October 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Nader H. Bshouty. Exact learning. Unpublished manuscript, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Michael Clausen, Andreas Dress, Johannes Grabmeier, and Marek Karpinski. On zero-testing and interpolation of k-sparse multivariate polynomials over finite fields. Theoretical Computer Science, 84:151-164, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Paul Fischer and Hans Ulrich Simon. On learning ring-sum-expansions. SIAM Journal on Computing, 21(1): 181-192, February 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.PeterGemmell and Madhu Sudan. Highly resilient correctors for polynomials. Information Processing Letters, 43(4): 169-174, September 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Dima Yu. Grigoriev, Marek Karpinski, and Michael E Singers. Fast parallel algorithms for sparse multivariate polynomial interpolation over finite fields. SIAM Journal on Computing, 19(6): 1059-1963, December 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.David Haussler. Decision theoretic generalizations of the PAC model for neural net and other learning applications. Information and Computation, 100(1):78-150, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Lisa Hellerstein and Manfred Warmuth. InterpolatingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.I.N. Herstein. Topics in Algebra. Wiley, second edition, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Eyal Kushilevitz and Yishay Mansour. Learning decision trees using the fourier spectrum. In Proceedings of the Twenty Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 455--464, May 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. 16.Yishay Mansour. Randomized interpolation and approximation of sparse polynomials, In Automata. Languages and Programming: 19th International Colloquium, pages 261-272, July 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Ron M. Roth and Gyora M. Benedek. Interpolation and approximation of sparse multivariate polynomials over GF(2). SIAM Journal on Computing, 20(2):291-314, April 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.L. G. Valiant. A theory of the learnable. Communications of the ACM, 27(11): 1134-1142, November 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.Richard Zippel. Probabilistic algorithms for sparse polynomials. In Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, pages 216-226. Springer-Verlag, June 1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.Richard Zippel. Interpolating polynomials from their values. Journal of SymboUc Computation, 9:375--403, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Learning sparse multivariate polynomials over a field with queries and counterexamples

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                COLT '93: Proceedings of the sixth annual conference on Computational learning theory
                August 1993
                463 pages
                ISBN:0897916115
                DOI:10.1145/168304

                Copyright © 1993 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 August 1993

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate35of71submissions,49%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader