skip to main content
10.1145/1709886.1709896acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Revealing the invisible: visualizing the location and event flow of distributed physical devices

Published:24 January 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Distributed physical user interfaces comprise networked sensors, actuators and other devices attached to a variety of computers in different locations. Developing such systems is no easy task. It is hard to track the location and status of component devices, even harder to understand, validate, test and debug how events are transmitted between devices, and hardest yet to see if the overall system behaves correctly. Our Visual Environment Explorer supports developers of these systems by visualizing the location and status of individual and/or aggregate devices. It visualizes the current event flow between devices as they are received and transmitted, as well as the event history. Events are displayable at various levels of detail. The visualization also shows the activity of applications that use these physical devices. The tool is highly interactive: developers can explore system behavior through spatial navigation, zooming, multiple simultaneous views, event filtering, details-on-demand, and time-dependent semantic zooming.

References

  1. Baecker, R., DiGiano, C., and Marcus, A. Software visualization for debugging. Commun. ACM 40, 4, (1997), 44--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Buschmann, C., Pfisterer, D., Fischer, S., Fekete, S.P., and Kroller, A. SpyGlass: a wireless sensor network visualizer. ACM SIGBED Review 2, 1 (2005), 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Buxton, W.A.S. Living in Augmented Reality: Ubiquitous Media and Reactive Environments. In K. Finn, A. Sellen and S. Wilber, eds., Video Mediated Communication. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1997), 363--384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Consolvo, S., Roessler, P., and Shelton, B.E. The CareNet Display: Lessons Learned from an In Home Evaluation of an Ambient Display. Proc. of UbiComp 2004, Springer (2004), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ducheneaut, N., Smith, T.F., Begole, J.B., Newman, M.W., and Beckmann, C. The Orbital Browser: Composing Ubicomp Services Using Only Rotation and Selection. Ext. Abstracts of CHI 2006, ACM (2006), 321--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Egglestone, S.R., Humble, J., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., and Hampshire, A. The Equator Component Toolkit: Managing Digital Information Flow in the Home. Adj. Proc. of UIST 2006, ACM (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan, F. and Biagioni, E.S. An approach to data visualization and interpretation for sensor networks. Proc. of HICSS 2004, IEEE (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fitzmaurice, G.W., Ishii, H., and Buxton, W.A.S. Bricks: Laying the Foundations for Graspable User Interfaces. Proc. of CHI 1995, ACM (1995), 442--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Girod, L., Stathopoulos, T., Ramanathan, N., et al. A system for simulation, emulation, and deployment of heterogeneous sensor networks. Proc. of 2nd int. Conf. on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, ACM (2004), 201--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Greenberg, S. and Fitchett, C. Phidgets: Easy Development of Physical Interfaces Through Physical Widgets. Proc. of UIST 2001, ACM (2001), 209--218. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gross, T. and Marquardt, N. CollaborationBus: An Editor for the Easy Configuration of Ubiquitous Computing Environments. Proc. of PDP 2007, IEEE (2007), 307--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hartmann, B., Klemmer, S.R., and Bernstein, M.d. tools: Integrated prototyping for physical interaction design. IEEE Pervasive Computing, (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hudson, S.E. and Mankoff, J. Rapid Construction of Functioning Physical Interfaces from Cardboard, Thumbtacks, Tin Foil and Masking Tape. Proc. of UIST 2006, ACM (2006), 289--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces Between People, Bits and Atoms. Proc. of CHI 1997, ACM (1997), 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Klemmer, S.R., Li, J., Lin, J., and Landay, J.A. Papier-Mache: Toolkit Support for Tangible Input. Proc. of CHI 2004, ACM (2004), 399--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Marquardt, N. and Greenberg, S. Distributed Physical Interfaces with Shared Phidgets. Proc. of TEI 2007, ACM (2007), 13--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Morris, M.R. Visualization for Casual Debugging and System Awareness in a Ubiquitous Computing Environment. Adj. Proc. of UbiComp 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mynatt, E.D., Rowan, J., Jacobs, A., and Craighill, S. Digital Family Portraits: Supporting Peace of Mind for Extended Family Members. Proc. of CHI 2001, ACM (2001), 333--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nath, S., Liu, J., and Zhao, F. Challenges in building a portal for sensors world-wide. First Workshop on World-Sensor-Web: Mobile Device Centric Sensory Networks and Applications (WSW), (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ndumu, D.T., Nwana, H.S., Lee, L.C., and Collis, J.C. Visualising and debugging distributed multi-agent systems. Proc. of the third annual conf. on Autonomous Agents, ACM (1999), 326--333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ringel, M., Tyler, J., Stone, M., Ballagas, R., and Borchers, J. iStuff: A Scalable Architecture for Lightweight, Wireless Devices for Ubicomp User Interfaces. Proc. of UbiComp 2002, Springer (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Salber, D., Dey, A.K., and Abowd, G.D. The Context Toolkit: Aiding the Development of Context-Enabled Applications. Proc. of CHI 1999, ACM (1999), 434--441. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Santanche, A., Nath, S., Liu, J., Priyantha, B., and Zhao, F. SenseWeb: Browsing the Physical World in Real Time. Proc. of IPSN 2006, ACM/IEEE (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Villar, N. and Gellersen, H. A Malleable Control Structure for Softwired User Interfaces. Proc. of TEI 2007, ACM (2007), 49--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Weiser, M. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265, (1991), 94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Wendlandt, D., Casado, M., Tarjan, P., and McKeown, N. The Clack graphical router: visualizing network software. Proc. of the 2006 ACM Symposium on Software Visualization, ACM (2006), 7--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Revealing the invisible: visualizing the location and event flow of distributed physical devices

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        TEI '10: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction
        January 2010
        414 pages
        ISBN:9781605588414
        DOI:10.1145/1709886

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 January 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader