Abstract
Introduction
Over the past decade, the mountains of data accumulating within firms - expanding at an annual rate of 30-50% and fueled in part by recent legislation such as SEC Rule 17a-4 mandating the retention of electronic communications (for example, email and instant messaging) in financial services firms for periods of up to three years - has forced information technology (IT) executives to ask how should this data deluge be managed. Intel, whose data warehouse is currently estimated at over 30 petabytes has increased its data storage by an average of 35% annually with the expectation that, if current trends continue, its data center could expand to 165 petabytes by 2014. Yet even as data volumes climb, causing data centers to double in size every other year, an innovation-led drop in annual per-gigabyte storage costs of between 35-45% (see Figure 1) has failed to halt the rise in storage spending.
With organizing and utilizing data now seen as one of the most critical issues facing firms worldwide, IT executives note that non-discretionary IT spending - 25% of which covers information management costs and storage infrastructure, in particular - has now reached a point where strategic IT initiatives are at risk. Hence, CIOs have a pressing need to understand the dynamics of information management costs and their ability to control these costs through carefully chosen policies governing data collection and retention. Knowing how these costs behave, CIOs can continue to support the data needs of their firms without limiting their IT goals.
To begin this process, we examine a tiered information framework that, by considering the value of information, allows CIOs to comprehend the interplay of market forces that shape information costs. Lastly, we review several challenges posed by our framework that future academic research can help to resolve.
- Allen, N. Don't Waste Your Storage Dollars: What You Need to Know. Gartner Group Research Report COM-13-1217, 2001.Google Scholar
- CIO Insight. Is your IT Budget being spent effectively? (Feb. 2005), 67--75.Google Scholar
- Computer Sciences Corporation. Critical Issues of Information Systems Management. Cambridge, MA, 2001. http://www.csc.com/features/2001/40.shtmlGoogle Scholar
- EMC Corporation. Information Lifecycle Management, 2004. http://www.emc.com/ilm/.Google Scholar
- Ferelli, M. Tiered storage: An idea whose time has come. Computer Technology Review 23, 11 (2003), 1--2.Google Scholar
- Gibson, G. and Van Meter, R. Network attached storage architecture. Comm. ACM 43, 11, (2000), 37--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glazer, R. Measuring the value of information: The information-intensive organization. IBM Systems Journal 32, 1, 1993, 99--110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilheany, S. The decline of magnetic disk storage cost over the next 25 years. Berghell Associates, 2004. http://www.berghell.com/whitepapers/Storage%20Costs.pdf.Google Scholar
- Lyman, P. and Varian, H. How Much Information? UC, Berkley, School of Information Management and Systems, 2003. http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/research/projects/how-much-info-2003/.Google Scholar
- Mata, F., Fuerst, W. and Barney, J. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly 19, 4, (1995), 487--505. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). Final rule: Retention of records relevant to audits and reviews. http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8180.htm.Google Scholar
- Tallon, P. and Scannell, R. Information lifecycle management. Comm. ACM 50, 11, (2007), 65--69. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Understanding the dynamics of information management costs
Recommendations
Information technology outsourcing and non-IT operating costs: an empirical investigation
Does information technology outsourcing reduce non-IT operating costs? This study examines this question and also asks whether internal IT investments moderate the relationship between IT outsourcing and non-IT operating costs. Using a panel data set of ...
Information management in public sector agencies: a context-sensitive conceptual framework of CIO competence
Current issues in IT educationManagerial responsibilities for information technology (IT) have, increasingly, been consolidated in the person of the "chief information officer" (CIO). Despite the increased prevalence of the CIO position, no one model has emerged that explains what ...
Information Technology Management Roles: A Comparison of IT Executives and IT Project Managers
HICSS '02: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'02)-Volume 8 - Volume 8This study investigates the emphasis placed on different managerial roles of information technology (IT) executives and IT project managers. Six managerial roles from Mintzberg's classic role model were applied in this research: resource allocator, ...
Comments