Charles E. Downing
Abstract
Introduction
The 1980s saw the advent of the personal computer, and the days of "Data Processing" departments solely dictating the timeline of office productivity solutions were gone. The 1990s saw the advent of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software packages, and organizations enthusiastically (even if sometimes slowly and painfully) moved from the silo mentality of departmental and unit-based information systems solutions to enterprise-wide information solutions. Today, companies are increasingly realizing that the progression from departmental to enterprise information systems has a logical next step: inter-organizational or supply chain solutions. While many pioneering companies have linked to their customers and suppliers for years, the improving reliability and security of the Web presents new opportunities for all organizations. Companies are increasingly moving to the Web or considering moving to the Web to conduct business transactions, connecting themselves with suppliers and customers.
Much of the recent research on electronic data interchange and information technology (IT) in the supply chain has focused on using the Web to conduct business-to-business (B2B) commerce across the supply chain, thus improving the older electronic data interchange ("EDI") model. The B2B market has grown steadily over the last several years. As an increasing portion of companies migrate to the Web it becomes important for both academics and practitioners to understand the benefits and pitfalls of such a migration. Numerous studies enumerate the benefits of electronic supply chain integration and B2B, and these benefits fall into the following categories: Reduction of process cost, improved operational efficiency, improved customer satisfaction, improved coordination, cooperation, and commitment between EDI partners, and improved overall process performance. However, a study has not been done which compares the process performance benefits of all three possible groups: Companies or processes (hereafter simply "companies") using no electronic supply chain integration (verbal and/or paper orders, invoices, etc.), companies using non-Web-based Supply Chain Integration (traditional EDI, using private or leased lines), and companies using Web-based supply chain integration. A notable exception occurred in a 2002 study, but this study was done on only 18 companies, a very small sample size. Also, many current studies claim that companies are misdiagnosing the advantages of B2B over existing ways of doing business. The absence of a three group comparison, along with a possible misdiagnosis of advantages, calls for further examination.
Thus, this research will attempt to determine differences in the performance of companies using no electronic supply chain integration, companies using non-Web-based supply chain integration, and companies using Web-based supply chain integration.
- Day, G., Feing, A., and Ruppersberger, G. Shakeouts in digital markets: Lessons from B2B exchanges. California Management Review 45, 2 (2003), 131--150.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Downing, Charles E. Performance of traditional and Web-based EDI. Information Systems Management 19, 1, (Winter 2002), 49--55.Google Scholar
- Goudie, D., Hynes, T., and Morgan, P. Business to business e-commerce. Retrieved from Memorial University of Newfoundland: http://Web.ucs.mun.ca/~dgoudie/B8205/, 1999.Google Scholar
- Greenemeier, Larry. B-To-B commerce predicted to reach $6.3 trillion in 2005. InformationWeek Online, October 2000.Google Scholar
- Havenstein, H. Web services mature, see more B2B transaction use. Computerworld 39, 30 (Jul 25, 2005), 7.Google Scholar
- Lee, H., Clark, T., and Tam, K. Research report. Can EDI benefit adopters? Information Systems Research 10, 2, (June 1999), 186--195. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mukhopadhyay, T., Kekre, S., and Kalathur, S. Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quarterly 19, 2, (June 1995), 137--156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Muller, N. How the Internet is breaking down barriers to EDI. Information Systems Management 15, 3, (Summer 1998), 78--81.Google Scholar
- Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., and Simchi-Levi, E. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain (Irwin McGraw-Hill, Burr Ridge, IL: 2000). Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Is web-based supply chain integration right for your company?
Recommendations
Barriers to supply chain information integration: SMEs adrift of eLands
AbstractThe literature extols the potential benefits of supply chain integration and the crucial role of integrated eBusiness to deliver those benefits. However, adoption of eBusiness in supply chains has been slower than expected, particularly in small ...
Web-based supply chain integration model
Managing e-commerce and mobile computing technologiesThis chapter discusses various business process supply-chain models and emphasizes the need for organizations to apply CRM concepts and to integrate the Internet within the functions of the supply chain in order to be able to gain good customer ...
Integrating Supply Chain by the Supply Chain Operation Referential Model
KMO '16: Proceedings of the The 11th International Knowledge Management in Organizations Conference on The changing face of Knowledge Management Impacting SocietySupply Chain Management aims to overcome the challenges to integrate the Supply Chain Entities with a shared vision and evolving gradually as a legion in the business ecosystem and supply network. With the integrated inter-company activities, these ...
Comments