Abstract
Introduction
While figures vary over time and across industries, the fact is that for most firms, information technology (IT) investments constitute their largest capital-spending item. On average, large US firms spend $300-500 million/year (or 3-4% of total revenue) on IT, with $50-90 million of those dollars invested in new IT products and services. Nevertheless, industrywide managerial attitudes regarding the value of IT innovation have fluctuated over the years. An emerging pattern is characterized by periods of optimism, in which IT innovation is celebrated as a panacea for all business ills, followed by periods of pessimism, in which doubt prevails about the value of investing in new IT, with persisting arguments regarding the ease with which IT can be replicated (Figure 1).
In all fairness, in the modern hypercompetitive world it is unlikely that any single investment in IT (or non-IT, for that matter) will lead to a sustained competitive advantage. Instead, what does appear to make a difference is a company's ability to innovate with IT over time. Wal-Mart is a case in point. As Friedman notes, "Wal-Mart … was the first to computerize, the first to use wireless, the first to really deploy RFID … they adopted and adapted faster to new technology than any other retailer in the world. And you've got to give them credit for that. You've got to worry about and be troubled by some of the brutal side of their business practices. But at the end of the day … [they] … out-innovated all their competitors." Similar stories can be found elsewhere in the business world: Harrah's in the entertainment industry, Equifax in credit reporting, RR Donnelley in printing, and Harley-Davidson in the motorcycle industry. What these companies demonstrate---and many innovative IT-adopters corroborate---is that competitors have a hard time imitating and keeping up when a series of IT investments have become integrated with procedural and organizational innovations over the course of several years. In other words, while a single investment in new IT might be easy to copy, it is much more difficult for competitors to replicate a company's ability to innovate with IT over the longer term. This is important for managers to note because those capabilities that are valuable and not easily replicated are more likely to be a source of competitive advantage.
To date, only theoretical research has been conducted in this area of IT innovation. In this article, we present empirical results that support the belief that the ability to innovate with IT over time is not easily replicated by competing firms. Given the vast amounts of money currently spent on new IT and, consequently, the high stakes involved in IT innovation initiatives, such evidence is critical. In this article we address the following questions: How likely is it that a firm that has out-innovated its competitors this year will be able to repeat this performance in the following year? In other words, is IT innovation persistent? How do fluctuations in industry-wide managerial attitudes towards IT affect the persistence of IT innovation? Are innovative firms more likely to out-innovate their competitors during periods of managerial optimism or pessimism? How likely is it that a firm will go from a state of non-innovation to being able to out-innovate its competitors within a relatively short period (3-4 years)? In other words, how long does it take for a firm to acquire and develop the ability to out-innovate its competitors?
- Carr, N. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Business Review, (May 2003), 41--48.Google Scholar
- Curley, M. The IT transformation at Intel. MIS Quarterly Executive 5, 4, (2006) 155--168.Google Scholar
- Friedman T. Wake up and face the flat Earth -- Thomas L. Friedman interviewed by N. Chanda, YaleGlobal, 4/18/2005 Accessed on 9/18/2007 from http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=5581Google Scholar
- Gartner Research. Understanding hype cycles. http://www.gartner.com/pages/story.php.id.8795.s.8.jspGoogle Scholar
- Grover, V., Teng, J., and Fiedler, K. IS investment priorities in contemporary organizations. Comm ACM 41, 2, (Feb. 1998). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hoffman. IT innovation interruptus. Computerworld, 9/29/2003; http://www.computerworld.com/industrytopics/retail/story/0,10801,85310,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Hoover, N. From bankrupt to innovative in four years. InformationWeek, September 12, 2006; http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=192600624Google Scholar
- InformationWeek 500 Reports (2002-2004); http://www.informationweek.com/iw500Google Scholar
- Nolan, R. and McFarlan, F.W. Information technology and the board of directors. Harvard Business Review, (Oct. 2005), 96--106.Google Scholar
- Rai, R., Patnayakuni, R., and Patnayakuni, N. Technology investment and business performance. Comm. ACM 40, 7, (1997) 89--97. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Swanson, E.B., and Ramiller, N.C. Innovating mindfully with information technology. MIS Quarterly 28, 4, (2004), 553--583. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- IT innovation persistence: an oxymoron?
Recommendations
Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators
Research on exploration and exploitation is burgeoning, yet our understanding of the antecedents and consequences of both activities remains rather unclear. We advance the growing body of literature by focusing on the apparent differences of exploration ...
Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation?
This study extends earlier empirical research into organizational decline which has found that substandard performance stimulates innovation in a wide range of manufacturing industries. Using data from 74 U.S. high technology firms, this research ...
Organizational Innovation and Substandard Performance: When is Necessity the Mother of Innovation?
This study extends earlier empirical research into organizational decline which has found that substandard performance stimulates innovation in a wide range of manufacturing industries. Using data from 74 U.S. high technology firms, this research ...
Comments