skip to main content
10.1145/1743384.1743468acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Processing body sensor data streams for continuous physiological monitoring

Published:29 March 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the recent advancement in the wearable sensor technology, various body sensor network systems are being incorporated in the garments to monitor continuous physiological as well as motor behavior of an individual. The raw physiological time series data coming from on-body sensors requires a thorough analysis for extraction of meaningful information. In addition, extracted information need to be presented/recommended to monitoring personnel/self to derive the high-level interpretation of the physiological state without having domain knowledge.

In this paper, we propose a knowledge management system that extracts and conveys the information of the physiological states using individualized factor analysis model. The factor analysis based on the quantitative features extracted from the raw data streams provides the hidden knowledge components in the form of latent factors. We tested this system on the raw electromyogram signals from the hand muscles collected during the continuous monitoring of repetitive hand movements, where the hidden information in the form of intensity level of the activity and the muscle fatigue was extracted from the time and frequency domain features.

References

  1. J. Balter, A. Labarre-Vila, D. ZiÜAl'belin, and C. Garbay. A Platform Integrating Knowledge and Data Management for EMG Studies, pages 417--420. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. B. Bigland-Ritchie, E. F. Donovan, and C. S. Roussos. Conduction velocity and EMG power spectrum changes in fatigue of sustained maximal efforts. J Appl Physiol, 51(5):1300--1305, Nov. 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. G. Filligoi and F. Felici. Detection of hidden rhythms in surface EMG signals with a non-linear time-series tool. Medical Engineering & Physics, 21(6-7):439--448, July 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen, J. RÜA ¨ynager, and S. Vingtoft. PC-KANDID: an expert system for electromyography. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 1(3):117--124, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. N. F. Güler and S. Koçer. Classification of emg signals using pca and fft. J. Med. Syst., 29(3):241--250, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. M. Hagg. Interpretation of EMG spectral alterations and alteration indexes at sustained contraction. J Appl Physiol, 73(4):1211--1217, Oct. 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. C. Hershler and M. Milner. An optimality criterion for processing electromyographic (emg) signals relating to human locomotion. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-25(5):413--420, Sept. 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. Hiraiwa, K. Shimohara, and Y. Tokunaga. EMG pattern analysis and classification by neural network. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1989. Conference Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on, pages 1113--1115 vol.3, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Huysmans, M. Hoozemans, A. van der Beek, M. de Looze, and J. van DieÁńn. Fatigue effects on tracking performance and muscle activity. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 18(3):410--419, June 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. K. K. Jung, J. W. Kim, H. K. Lee, S. B. Chung, and K. H. Eom. Emg pattern classification using spectral estimation and neural network. pages 1108--1111, Sept. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. G. A. Koumantakis, F. Arnall, R. G. Cooper, and J. A. Oldham. Paraspinal muscle EMG fatigue testing with two methods in healthy volunteers. reliability in the context of clinical applications. Clinical Biomechanics, 16(3):263--266, Mar. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. N. Lavrac. Selected techniques for data mining in medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 16(1):3--23, May 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. W. Melek, Z. Lu, A. Kapps, and W. Fraser. Comparison of trend detection algorithms in the analysis of physiological time-series data. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 52(4):639--651, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. L. A. Merkle, C. S. Layne, J. J. Bloomberg, and J. J. Zhang. Using factor analysis to identify neuromuscular synergies during treadmill walking. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 82(2):207--214, Aug. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. R. Merletti, M. Knaflitz, and C. J. D. Luca. Myoelectric manifestations of fatigue in voluntary and electrically elicited contractions. J Appl Physiol, 69(5):1810--1820, Nov. 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. S. Shahid, J. Walker, G. Lyons, C. Byrne, and A. Nene. Application of higher order statistics techniques to EMG signals to characterize the motor unit action potential. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 52(7):1195--1209, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. G. Sjøgaard and K. Søgaard. Muscle injury in repetitive motion disorders. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 351:21--31, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. P. S. Sung, U. Zurcher, and M. Kaufman. Reliability difference between spectral and entropic measures of erector spinae muscle fatigability. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, In Press, Corrected Proof.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. D. Winter. Pathologic gait diagnosis with computer averaged electromyographic profiles. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., 65:393--398, Sept. 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. G.-Z. Yang. Body Sensor Networks. Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Processing body sensor data streams for continuous physiological monitoring

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MIR '10: Proceedings of the international conference on Multimedia information retrieval
      March 2010
      600 pages
      ISBN:9781605588155
      DOI:10.1145/1743384

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 March 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader