skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753332acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reactive information foraging for evolving goals

Published: 10 April 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Information foraging models have predicted the navigation paths of people browsing the web and (more recently) of programmers while debugging, but these models do not explicitly model users' goals evolving over time. We present a new information foraging model called PFIS2 that does model information seeking with potentially evolving goals. We then evaluated variants of this model in a field study that analyzed programmers' daily navigations over a seven-month period. Our results were that PFIS2 predicted users' navigation remarkably well, even though the goals of navigation, and even the information landscape itself, were changing markedly during the pursuit of information.

References

[1]
Anderson, J.R. The Adaptive Character Of Thought. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1990.
[2]
Anderson, J.R. Rules of the Mind. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1993.
[3]
Baeza-Yates, R. and Ribeiro-Neto, B. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison Wesley Longman, Reading, MA, 1999.
[4]
Becchetti, L., Castillo, C., Donato, D., Baeza-Yates, R. and Leonardi, S. Link analysis for web spam detection. ACM Transactions on the Web 2, 1 (2008).
[5]
Bettenburg, N., Just, S., Schroeter, A., Weiss, C., Premraj, R., and Zimmermann, T., What makes a good bug report? In Proc. FSE 2008, ACM Press (2008), 308--318.
[6]
Brooks, R., Towards a theory of the comprehension of computer programs. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 18, (1983), 543--554.
[7]
Card, S., Pirolli, P., Van Der Wege, M., Morrison, J., Reeder, R., Schraedley, P., & Boshart, J. Information scent as a driver of web behavior graphs: Results of a protocol analysis method for web usability, In Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 498--505.
[8]
Chi, E., Hong, L., Heiser, J., Card, S. ScentIndex: Conceptually reorganizing subject indexes for reading. In Proc. IEEE VAST, IEEE (2006), 159--166.
[9]
Chi, E., Pirolli, P, Chen, K. and Pitkow, J, Using information scent to model user information needs and actions on the web. In Proc. CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 490--497.
[10]
Chi, E., Rosien, A., Supattanasiri, G., Williams, A., Royer, C., Chow, C., Robles, E., Dalal, B., Chen, J., Cousins, S. The Bloodhound project: Automating discovery of web usability issues using the InfoScent simulator, In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 505--512.
[11]
Cubranic, D., Murphy, G., Singer, J. and Booth, K. Hipikat: A project memory for software development, IEEE Trans. Soft. Engr. 31, 6 (June 2005), 446--465.
[12]
Fetterly, D., Manasse, M., Najork, M. and Wiener, J. A large-scale study of the evolution of web pages. In Proc. 12th International World Wide Web Conf., ACM Press (May 2003), 669--678.
[13]
Fu, W. and Pirolli, P. SNIF-ACT: A cognitive model of user navigation on the world wide web, Human-Computer Interaction 22, 4 (Nov. 2007), 355--412.
[14]
Hill, E., Pollock, L., and Vijay-Shanker, K. Automatically capturing source code context of NL-queries for software maintenance and reuse, In Proc. ICSE 2009, IEEE Computer Society (2009), 232--242.
[15]
Ko, A., Myers, B., and Chau, D. A linguistic analysis of how people describe software problems, In Proc. VLHCC, IEEE (2006), 127--136.
[16]
Ko, A., Myers, B., Coblenz, M., and Aung, H., An exploratory study of how developers seek, relate, and collect relevant information during software maintenance tasks, IEEE Trans. Software Engineering 32, 12 (Dec. 2006), 971--987.
[17]
Landauer, T.K. and Dumais, S.T.A solution to Plato's problem: the Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 2 (1997), 211--240.
[18]
Lawrance, J., Bellamy, R., Burnett, M., and Rector, K. Using information scent to model the dynamic foraging behavior of programmers in maintenance tasks, In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1323--1332.
[19]
Lawrance, J., Bellamy, R., Burnett, M. and Rector, K. Can information foraging pick the fix? A field study, In Proc. IEEE VLHCC, IEEE (2008), 57--64.
[20]
Lawrance, J., Bogart, C., Burnett, M., Bellamy, R., and Rector, K. How people debug, revisited: An information foraging theory perspective. IBM Technical Report RC24783 (2009). (Under review.)
[21]
Manning, C. and Schutze, Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, May 1999.
[22]
Nielsen, J. Information foraging: Why Google makes people leave your site faster http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030630.html. June 30, 2003.
[23]
Olston, C., Chi, E. ScentTrails: Integrating browsing and searching on the web. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 10, 3 (2003), 177--197.
[24]
Pirolli, P. and Card, S., Information foraging in information access environments. In Proc. CHI 1995, ACM Press (1995), 51--58.
[25]
Pirolli, P. Computational models of information scent-following in a very large browsable text collection. In Proc. CHI 1997, ACM Press (1997), 3--10.
[26]
Pirolli, P. and Card, S. Information foraging, Psychology Review 106, 4 (1999), 643--675.
[27]
Pirolli, P. Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
[28]
Robillard, M.P. and Murphy, G.C. Concern Graphs: Finding and describing concerns using structural program dependencies, In Proc. ICSE 2002, ACM Press (2002), 406--416.
[29]
Spool, J., Profetti, C., and Britain, D., Designing for the scent of information, User Interface Engineering, (2004).

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
April 2010
2690 pages
ISBN:9781605589299
DOI:10.1145/1753326
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 April 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. field study
  2. information foraging theory
  3. programming

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CHI '10
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 14 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The rising entropy of English in the attention economyCommunications Psychology10.1038/s44271-024-00117-12:1Online publication date: 1-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Developers’ information seeking in Question & Answer websites through a gender lensJournal of Computer Languages10.1016/j.cola.2024.10126779(101267)Online publication date: Jun-2024
  • (2023)A sensemaking analysis of API learning using ReactJournal of Computer Languages10.1016/j.cola.2022.10118974(101189)Online publication date: Jan-2023
  • (2023)Modeling Foraging Behavior in GitHubHCI International 2023 Posters10.1007/978-3-031-35998-9_21(149-155)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Developers Foraging Behavior in Code Hosting Sites: A Gender PerspectiveHuman Interface and the Management of Information10.1007/978-3-031-35129-7_42(575-593)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
  • (2022)How Do Web-Active End-User Programmers Forage?Coding Theory - Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Applications10.5772/intechopen.97765Online publication date: 25-May-2022
  • (2022)Information Seeking Behavior for Bugs on GitHub: An Information Foraging Perspective2022 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC53370.2022.9833144(1-3)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
  • (2022)Developers’ Foraging Behavior on Stack Overflow2022 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)10.1109/VL/HCC53370.2022.9833123(1-3)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2022
  • (2021)The Shoutcasters, the Game Enthusiasts, and the AI: Foraging for Explanations of Real-time Strategy PlayersACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems10.1145/339604711:1(1-46)Online publication date: 15-Mar-2021
  • (2021)Version Control Systems: An Information Foraging PerspectiveIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2019.293129647:8(1644-1655)Online publication date: 1-Aug-2021
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media