skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753392acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

BuzzWear: alert perception in wearable tactile displays on the wrist

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present two experiments to evaluate wrist-worn wearable tactile displays (WTDs) that provide easy to perceive alerts for on-the-go users. The first experiment (2304 trials, 12 participants) focuses on the perception sensitivity of tactile patterns and reveals that people discriminate our 24 tactile patterns with up to 99% accuracy after 40 minutes of training. Among the four parameters (intensity, starting point, temporal pattern, and direction) that vary in the 24 patterns, intensity is the most difficult parameter to distinguish and temporal pattern is the easiest. The second experiment (9900 trials, 15 participants) focuses on dual task performance, exploring users' abilities to perceive three incoming alerts from two mobile devices (WTD and mobile phone) with and without visual distraction. The second experiment reveals that, when visually distracted, users' reactions to incoming alerts become slower for the mobile phone but not for the WTD.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

1753392.mp4

mp4

123.3 MB

References

  1. D. Ashbrook, J. Clawson, K. Lyons, T. Starner, and N.J. Patel. Quickdraw: the impact of mobility and on-body placement on device access time. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 219--222, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Bach-y-Rita, M.E. Tyler, and K.A. Kaczmarek. Seeing with the brain. International Journal of HCI, 15(2):285--295, Apr. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. C.W. Borst and V.B. Baiyya. A 2d haptic glyph method for tactile arrays : Design and evaluation. World Haptics Conference, 0:599--604, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S.A. Brewster and L.M. Brown. Tactons: Structured tactile messages for non-visual information display. In Proc. of the Australasian User Interface Conf., 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L.M. Brown and S.A. Brewster. Multidimensional tactons for non-visual informaiton display in mobile devices. In Proceedings of MobileHCI 2006, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Chan, K. MacLean, and J. McGrenere. Learning and identifying haptic icons under workload. In Proc. of the Eurohaptics Conf., 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H.-Y. Chen, J. Santos, M. Graves, K. Kim, and H.Z. Tan. Tactor localization at the wrist. In Proc. of the EuroHaptics, pages 209--218, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R.W. Cholewiak and A.A. Collins. Vibrotactile localization on the arm: effects of place, space, and age. Perception and Psychophysics, 65(7):1058--1077, Oct 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Y. Cui, J. Chipchase, and F. Ichikawa. A cross culture study on phone carrying and physical personalization. In HCI (10), pages 483--492, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. F.A. Geldard. Some neglected possibilities of communication. Science, 131(3413):1583--1588, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. F.A. Geldard. Sensory Saltation: Metastability in the Perceptual World. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc, Hillsdale, NJ, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G.H.E. Gendolla. Self-relevance of performance, task difficulty, and task engagement assessed as cardiovascular response. Motivation and Emotion, 23(1):45--66, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. H. Kajimoto, Y. Kanno, and S. Tachi. Forehead electro-tactile display for vision substitution. In Proceedings of the EuroHaptics, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S.C. Lee and T. Starner. Mobile gesture interaction using wearable tactile displays. In Proc. of the SIGCHI conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3437--3442. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S.C. Lee and T. Starner. Constructing mental model to label spatial tactile patterns on the wrist. 2010 (unpublished).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. K.E. MacLean. Foundations of transparency in tactile information design. IEEE Trans. Haptics, 1(2):84--95, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Okamura. Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 31(6):499--508, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. A. Oulasvirta, S. Tamminen, V. Roto, and J. Kuorelahti. Interaction in 4-second bursts: the fragmented nature of attentional resources in mobile hci. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 919--928, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. Pasquero. Stress: A tactile display using lateral skin stretch. Mechanical eng., McGill University, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Patel, J. Kientz, G. Hayes, S. Bhat, and G. Abowd. Farther than you may think: An empirical investigation of the proximity of users to their mobile phones. Ubiquitous Computing, 4206:123--140, Sep 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J.S. Rubinstein, D.E. Meyer, and E. Jefferey E. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psyc.: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4):763--797, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. W. Schneider, S.T. Dumais, and R.M. Shiffrin. Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuramin and D. Davies, editors, Varieties of attention, pages 1--27. Academic Press, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. E.H. Schumacher, T.L. Seymour, J.M. Glass, D.E. Fencsik, E.J. Lauber, D.E. Kieras, and D.E. Meyer. Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2):101--108, Mar 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. H.Z. Tan, R. Gray, J.J. Young, and R. Traylor. A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing. Haptics-e, 3:20, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. S. Weinstein. Intensive and extensive aspects of tactile sensitivity as a function of body-part, sex and laterality, chapter 10, pages 195--218. The Skin Senses. Springfield, C.C. Thomas, 1968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. C.D. Wickens. Processing resources and attention. In D.L. Damos, editor, Multiple-task performance, pages 3--34. Taylor & Francis, 1st edition, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. R.M. Yerkes and J.D. Dodson. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psyc., 18:459--482, 1908.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. BuzzWear: alert perception in wearable tactile displays on the wrist

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2690 pages
      ISBN:9781605589299
      DOI:10.1145/1753326

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader