research-article

Designing interactivity in media interfaces: a communications perspective

Authors:

S. Shyam Sundar,

Saraswathi BellurAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Pages 2247 - 2256

https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753666

Published: 10 April 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Interactivity has become ubiquitous in the digital media landscape. Numerous interactive tools are designed, tested, deployed and evaluated. Yet, we do not have generalizable knowledge about the larger concept of interactivity and its psychological impact on user experience. As a first step toward a theory of interface interactivity, this paper identifies three species of interactivity corresponding to three central elements of communication - source, medium, and message. Interactivity situated in any of these three loci of communication can provide cues and affordances that operate either individually or together to capture users' attention and determine the nature and depth of their processing of online content as well as contribute to their perceptions, attitudes and behavioral intentions. This paper discusses psychological mechanisms by which the three classes of interactivity tools affect users, with the specific purpose of drawing out design implications and outlining UI challenges for strategic development of interactive interfaces.

References

[1]

Basil, M. D. Multiple resource theory I: Application to television viewing. Communication Research, 21 (1994), 177--207.

[2]

Basso, A., Goldberg, D., Greenspan, S., & Weimer, D. First impressions: emotional and cognitive factors underlying judgments of trust e-commerce. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (2001). Tampa, Florida.

Digital Library

[3]

Berlo, D. K. The process of communication. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1960.

[4]

Bucy, E. P. The interactivity paradox: Closer to the news but confused. In E. P. Bucy and J. E. Newhagen (Eds.), Media access: Social and psychological dimensions of new technology use (pp. 47--72). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2004.

[5]

Gonzales, A. L., Finley, T., & Duncan, S. P. (Perceived)Interactivity: Does interactivity increase enjoyment and creative identity in artistic spaces? Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2009). Boston, MA.

Digital Library

[6]

Jensen, J. F. The concept of "interactivity" in interactive television. In J. F. Jensen & C. Toscan (Eds.), Interactive Television: TV of the future or the future of TV? Aalborg University Press, Aalborg, 1999.

[7]

Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. The psychological appeal of personalized online content in Web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication, 56(2006), 110--132.

[8]

Kweon, S. H., Cho, E. J., & Kim, E. M. Interactivity dimension: Media, content, and user perception. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts (2008). Athens, Greece.

Digital Library

[9]

Lang, A. Defining audio/video redundancy from a limited-capacity information processing perspective. Communication Research, 22, 1(1995), 86--115.

[10]

Latimer, A. E., Katulak, N. A., Mowad, L., & Salovey, P. Motivating cancer prevention and early detection behaviors using psychologically tailored messages Journal of Health Communication, 10(2005). 137--155.

[11]

Metcalfe, J., Glavanov, D., & Murdock, M. Spatial and temporal processing in the auditory and visual modalities. Memory and Cognition, 9(1981), 351--359.

[12]

Nelson, D. L., Reed, V.S., & Walling, J. R. Pictorial superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 5(1976), 523--528.

[13]

New York Times. The first presidential debate. Retrieved September 10, 2009 from http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/president/debates/first-presidential-debate.html.

[14]

Norman, D. A. Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6,3(1999), 38--42.

Digital Library

[15]

Oviatt, S., MacEachern, M., & Levow, G.-A. Predicting hyper articulate speech during human-computer error resolution. Speech Communication, 24(1998), 87--110.

Digital Library

[16]

Paivio, A. Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford University Press, New York, 1986.

[17]

Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M. & Brock, T. C. Cognitive responses in persuasion. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1981.

[18]

Rafaeli, S. Interactivity: From new media to communication. In R. P. Hawkins, J. M. Wiemann & S. Pingree (Eds.), Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes (pp. 110--134). Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1988.

[19]

Rice, R. E., & Williams, F. Theories old and new: The study of new media. In R. E. Rice (Ed.) The new media: Communication, research, and technology (pp. 55--80). Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, 1984.

[20]

Reeves, B., & Nass, C. Perceptual user interfaces: Perceptual bandwidth. Communications of the ACM, 43, 3(2000), 65--70.

Digital Library

[21]

Revelle, G., Zuckerman, O., Druin, A., & Bolas, M. Tangible user interfaces for children. Extended abstract of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2005). Portland, Oregon.

Digital Library

[22]

Shannon, C. E, & Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1949.

Digital Library

[23]

Steuer, J. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(1992). 73--93.

[24]

Stout, P.A., Villegas, J., & Kim, H. Enhancing learning through use of interactive tools on health-related websites. Health Education Research, 16, 6(2001), 721--733.

[25]

Sundar, S. S. Multimedia effects on processing and perception of online news: A study of picture, audio, and video downloads. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 3 (2000), 480--499.

[26]

Sundar, S. S. Theorizing interactivity's effects. The Information Society, 20(2004). 385--389.

[27]

Sundar, S. S. Social psychology of interactivity in human--website interaction. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 89--104). University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007.

[28]

Sundar, S. S. Self as source: Agency and customization in interactive media. In E. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis & S. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 58--74). Routledge, New York, 2008.

[29]

Sundar, S. S. The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital, media, youth, and credibility (pp. 72--100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2008.

[30]

Sundar, S. S., & Constantin, C. Does interacting with media enhance news memory? Automatic vs. controlled processing of interactive news features. Paper presented at the 54th annual conference of the International Communication Association (2004), New Orleans, LA.

[31]

Sundar, S. S., Hesser, K., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. The effect of website interactivity on political persuasion. Paper presented at the 21st General Assembly & Scientific Conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research (1998), Glasgow, UK.

[32]

Sundar, S. S., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown, J. Explicating web site interactivity: Impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research, 30,1(2003), 30--59.

[33]

Sundar, S. S., & Kim, J. Interactivity and persuasion: Influencing attitudes with information and involvement. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5, 2(2005), 6--29.

[34]

Sundar, S. S., & Marathe, S. S. Is it tailoring or is it agency? Unpacking the psychological appeal of customized news. Paper presented at the 89th annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (2006), San Francisco, CA.

[35]

Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. Conceptualizing sources in online news. Journal of Communication, 51, 1(2001), 52--72.

[36]

Time.com. Addiction and the Brain. Retrieved September 10, 2009 from http://www.time.com/time/2007/addiction/.

[37]

Vorderer, P., Knobloch, S., and Schramm, H. Does entertainment suffer from interactivity? The impact of watching an interactive TV movie on viewers' experience of entertainment. Media Psychology, 3, 4(2001), 343--363.

Cited By

Najm ABanakou DMichael-Grigoriou D(2024)Development of a Modular Adjustable Wearable Haptic Device for XR ApplicationsVirtual Worlds10.3390/virtualworlds30400243:4(436-458)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds3040024
Hu SXing GXin J(2024)Impacting Elements of Metaverse Platforms’ Intentional Use in Cultural Education: Empirical Data Drawn from UTAUT, TTF, and Flow TheoryApplied Sciences10.3390/app1421998414:21(9984)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219984
김 윤쉬 원오 경(2023)가상피팅 서비스를 활용한 온라인 쇼핑에서의 소비자 심리 평가 과정Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles10.5850/JKSCT.2023.47.6.115747:6(1157-1176)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2023.47.6.1157
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Designing interactivity in media interfaces: a communications perspective
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)
    1. HCI theory, concepts and models
  2. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design theory, concepts and paradigms

Recommendations

Modality is the message: interactivity effects on perception and engagement
CHI EA '10: CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

New media interfaces offer a wide variety of modalities for interacting with systems. While typing and clicking remain the staple of most interfaces, several other modalities have emerged in recent years, enabling users to perform a range of other ...
Interactivity and user participation in the television lifecycle: creating, sharing, and controlling content
UXTV '08: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video

Interactive TV research encompasses a rather diverse body of work (e.g. multimedia, HCI, CSCW, UIST, user modeling, media studies) that has accumulated over the past 20 years. In this article, we highlight the state-of-the-art and consider two basic ...
Interactivity and memory

Existing research on the effects of interactivity tends to treat it as a global characteristic of the interface. However, not all content on an interface is endowed with interactive features. Therefore, it is important to explore how interactivity ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2010

2690 pages

ISBN:9781605589299

DOI:10.1145/1753326

General Chair:
Elizabeth Mynatt
Georgia Institute of Technology
,
Program Chairs:
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
Vienna University of Technology
,
Scott Hudson
Carnegie Mellon University
,
Keith Edwards
Georgia Tech
,
Tom Rodden
University of Nottingham

Copyright © 2010 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 April 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CHI '10

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '10: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 10 - 15, 2010

Georgia, Atlanta, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

59
Total Citations
View Citations
2,237
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)216
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)18

Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Najm ABanakou DMichael-Grigoriou D(2024)Development of a Modular Adjustable Wearable Haptic Device for XR ApplicationsVirtual Worlds10.3390/virtualworlds30400243:4(436-458)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/virtualworlds3040024
Hu SXing GXin J(2024)Impacting Elements of Metaverse Platforms’ Intentional Use in Cultural Education: Empirical Data Drawn from UTAUT, TTF, and Flow TheoryApplied Sciences10.3390/app1421998414:21(9984)Online publication date: 31-Oct-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219984
김 윤쉬 원오 경(2023)가상피팅 서비스를 활용한 온라인 쇼핑에서의 소비자 심리 평가 과정Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles10.5850/JKSCT.2023.47.6.115747:6(1157-1176)Online publication date: 31-Dec-2023
https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2023.47.6.1157
Zeng JXing YJin C(2023)The Impact of VR/AR-Based Consumers’ Brand Experience on Consumer–Brand RelationshipsSustainability10.3390/su1509727815:9(7278)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2023
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097278
Martínez-Cano FLachman RCanet F(2023)VR content and its prosocial impact: predictors, moderators, and mediators of media effects. A systematic literature reviewFrontiers in Communication10.3389/fcomm.2023.12032428Online publication date: 24-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1203242
Muresan AMcintosh JHornbæk K(2023)Using Feedforward to Reveal Interaction Possibilities in Virtual RealityACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/360362330:6(1-47)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603623
Bertrand AViard TBelloum REagan JMaxwell W(2023)On Selective, Mutable and Dialogic XAI: a Review of What Users Say about Different Types of Interactive ExplanationsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581314(1-21)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581314
Burrai FDe Marinis MPiredda M(2023)Virtual Reality During Chemotherapy InfusionHolistic Nursing Practice10.1097/HNP.0000000000000616Online publication date: 15-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000616
Kim SLee S(2023)Touchable pixelsComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2022.107588140:COnline publication date: 13-Feb-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107588
Tolzin AKörner ADickhaut EJanson ARummer RLeimeister J(2023)Designing Pedagogical Conversational Agents for Achieving Common GroundDesign Science Research for a New Society: Society 5.010.1007/978-3-031-32808-4_22(345-359)Online publication date: 19-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32808-4_22
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten