skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753688acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Are your participants gaming the system?: screening mechanical turk workers

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we discuss a screening process used in conjunction with a survey administered via Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. We sought an easily implementable method to disqualify those people who participate but don't take the study tasks seriously. By using two previously pilot tested screening questions, we identified 764 of 1,962 people who did not answer conscientiously. Young men seem to be most likely to fail the qualification task. Those that are professionals, students, and non-workers seem to be more likely to take the task seriously than financial workers, hourly workers, and other workers. Men over 30 and women were more likely to answer seriously.

References

  1. Amazon Mechanical Turk. https://www.mturk.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amazon Mechanical Turk: Best Practices Guide. http://mturkpublic.s3.amazonaws.com/docs/MTURK_BP.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Atwood, J. Is Amazon's Mechanical Turk a Failure? Coding Horror: Programming and Human Factors, April 9, 2007. http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000828.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Callison-Burch, C. Fast, cheap, and creative: Evaluating translation quality using Amazon's Mechanical Turk, In Proc. EMNLP 2009, ACL and AFNLP (2009), 286--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ipeirotis, P. Turker demographics vs. Internet demographics. http://behind-the-enemylines. blogspot.com/2009/03/turker-demographics-vsinternet. html. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kittur, A., Chi, E.H., and Suh, B. Crowdsourcing User Studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proc. CHI 2008, ACM Press, (2008), 453--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. MdFedries, P. Technically Speaking: It's a Wiki, Wiki World. IEEE spectrum, 43, (2006), 88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sheng, S., Holbrook, M., Kumaraguru, P., Cranor, L., & Downs, J. Who falls for phish? A demographic analysis of phishing susceptibility and effectiveness of interventions. In Proc. CHI 2010, ACM Press, (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Are your participants gaming the system?: screening mechanical turk workers

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2010
          2690 pages
          ISBN:9781605589299
          DOI:10.1145/1753326

          Copyright © 2010 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 10 April 2010

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader