skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753701acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

InPhase: evaluation of a communication system focused on "happy coincidences" of daily behaviors

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

To supplement existing forms of communication such as telephone and e-mail, this research proposes a new method of communicating "awareness" between people who are separated by long distances. In this paper, we investigate cases where coincidences in daily activities lead to casual conversation and thus intimacy and togetherness. We propose a new method of communicating these "happy coincidences" between a pair of remotely located locations. By equipping furniture and appliances such as doors, sofas, refrigerators and televisions with sensors, we developed a system wherein these items are connected to remote equivalents and their near simultaneous use is communicated. We conducted a two month field test of the system in a laboratory setting and a three month field test in an actual home. The study showed that the participant felt the presence of other people and thought about, imagined or even confirmed the habits of others by intentionally triggering the coincidence notification.

References

  1. http://twitter.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. http://www.digi.com/products/wireless/zigbee-mesh/xbee-series2-module.jspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Asch, S. Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1946, 258--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Brush, A.B., Inkpen, K.M., and Tee, K. 2008. SPARCS: exploring sharing suggestions to enhance family connectedness. In Proceedings of the ACM 2008 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (San Diego, CA, USA, November 08-12, 2008). CSCW '08. ACM, New York, NY, 629--638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chang, A., Resner, B., Loerner, B., Wang, X. and Ishii, J. LumiTouch: An emotional communication device. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2001, ACM Press (2001), 313--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chang, A., O'Modhrain, M.S., Jacob, R.J.K, Gunther, E. and Ishii, H. ComTouch: Design of a vibrotactile communication device. In Proc. of Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, 2002, pp. 312--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Chen, C.-Y., Forlizzi, J. and Jennings. P. ComSlipper: An expressive design to support awareness and availability. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 369--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chung, H., Lee, C.-H. J. and Selker, T. Lover's Cups: Drinking interfaces as new communication channels. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 375--480. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Dey, A.K. and de Guzman, E.: From awareness to connectedness: the design and deployment of presence displays, CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, New York, NY, USA, ACM, pp.899--908 (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dodge, C. The bed: A medium for intimate communication. Ext. Abstracts CHI 1997: ACM Press (1997), 371--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Elliot, K. and Greenberg, S. Building Flexible Displays for Awareness and Interaction. Video Proceedings and Proceedings Supplement of the UBICOMP 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenberg, S. and Kuzuoka, H. Using Digital but Physical Surrogates to Mediate Awareness, Communication and Privacy in Media Spaces. Personal Technologies, 4(1), January 2000, 182--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S.D., Leduc, N., Hagstrom, A.E., and Bayley, O. Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home. In Proc. CHI 2001. ACM Press (2001), 325--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. 1997. Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proc. CHI 1997. ACM Press (1997), 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Itoh, Y. Miyajima, A. and Watanabe, T. "TSUNAGARI" communication: Fostering a feeling of connection between family members. Ext Abstracts CHI 2002, ACM Press (2002), 810--811. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kaye, J. I just clicked to say I love you: rich evaluations of minimal communication. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2006, ACM Press (2006), 363--368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kuzuoka, H. and Greenberg, S. Mediating awareness and communication through digital but physical surrogates. Ext. Abstracts CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 11--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Romero, N., Markopoulos, P., Baren, J., Ruyter, B., Ijsselsteijn, W., and Farshchian, B. 2007. Connecting the family with awareness systems. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 11, 4 (Apr. 2007), 299--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Rowan, J. and Mynatt. E.D. Digital Family Portrait Field trial: Support for aging in place. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2005, ACM Press (2005), 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sekiguchi, D., Inami, M., and Tachi, S. RobotPHONE: RUI for interpersonal communication. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2001. ACM Press (2001), 277--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Siio, I., Rowan, J., Mima, N. and Mynatt, E. Digital Decor: Augmented Everyday Things. In Graphics Interface 2003, PP. 155--166, June 11-13 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Strong, R. and Gaver, W. Feather, Scent, and Shaker: Supporting simple intimacy. In Proc. of CSCW 1996, ACM Press (1996), 29--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Suzuki, K. and Hashimoto, S. Feellight: A communication device for distant nonverbal exchange. In Proc. of the 2004 ACM SIGMM Workshop on Effective Telepresence, (2004), 40--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tee, K., Brush, A.B., Inkpen, K.M. Exploring communication and sharing between extended families. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67, 2009, 128--138 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Tollmar, K., Junestrand, S., and Torgny, O. Virtually living together. In Proc. Designing Interactive Systems 2000. ACM Press (200), 83--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tsujita, H., Siio, I., and Tsukada, K. 2007. SyncDecor: appliances for sharing mutual awareness between lovers separated by distance. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 2699--2704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Vastenburg, M.H., Keyson, D.V., and Ridder, H. Considerate home notification systems: A user study of acceptability of notifications in a living-room laboratory. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67, 2009, 814--826 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. InPhase: evaluation of a communication system focused on "happy coincidences" of daily behaviors

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2690 pages
      ISBN:9781605589299
      DOI:10.1145/1753326

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader