skip to main content
10.1145/1753846.1753997acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Computational objects and expressive forms: a design exploration

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

We suggest the concept of expressive forms as a rising design theme to explore aesthetics of computational objects. The theme, exemplified in our design exploration, attempts to synthesize a concept-driven design process and exploratory engagement with new forms and materials available to computational objects. We report the detailed process of designing the soft-spiky mouse including prototyping and a pilot user study, leading to a discussion about the experiential qualities and design implications of expressive forms for research on aesthetic interaction.

References

  1. Arduino, http://www.arduino.cc/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Frens, J. W. (2006). Designing for Rich Interaction: Integrating Form, Interaction, and Function. Doctoral Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Harrison, S., Tatar, D., Sengers, P. (2007). The three paradigms of HCI, alt.CHI'07, San Jose, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Holman, D., Vertegaal, R. (2008). Organic user interfaces: designing computers in any way, shape, or form, Communications of the ACM, 51 (6). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jung, H., Altieri, Y., Bardzell, J. (2010). SKIN: Designing aesthetic interactive surfaces. In Proc. TEI 2010, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Löwgren, J. and Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful Interaction Design. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Norman, D. (2005). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sengers, P. and Gaver, B. (2006). Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation, In Proc. DIS'06, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Vallgårda, A. and Redstrom, J. (2007). Computational composites. In Proc. CHI'07, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Computational objects and expressive forms: a design exploration

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader