skip to main content
research-article

Multiobjective A* search with consistent heuristics

Published:25 June 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The article describes and analyzes NAMOA*, an algorithm for multiobjective heuristic graph search problems. The algorithm is presented as an extension of A*, an admissible scalar shortest path algorithm. Under consistent heuristics A* is known to improve its efficiency with more informed heuristics, and to be optimal over the class of admissible algorithms in terms of the set of expanded nodes and the number of node expansions. Equivalent beneficial properties are shown to prevail in the new algorithm.

References

  1. Alechina, N., and Logan, B. 2001. State space search with prioritised soft constraints. Appl. Intell. 14, 3, 263--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bentley, J., Kung, H., Schkolnick, M., and Thomson, C. 1978. On the average number of maxima in a set of vectors and applications. J. ACM 25, 4 (Oct.), 536--543. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dasgupta, P., Chakrabarti, P., and DeSarkar, S. 1995. Utility of pathmax in partial order heuristic search. Inf. Proc. Lett. 55, 317--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dasgupta, P., Chakrabarti, P., and DeSarkar, S. 1999. Multiobjective Heuristic Search. Vieweg, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dechter, R., and Pearl, J. 1985. Generalized best-first search strategies and the optimality of A*. J. ACM 32, 3 (July), 505--536. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dijkstra, E. W. 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math. 1, 269--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Gabrel, V., and Vanderpooten, D. 2002. Enumeration and interactive selection of efficient paths in a multiple criteria graph for scheduling an earth observing satellite. Europ. J. Operat. Res. 139, 533--542.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Hansen, P. 1979. Bicriterion path problems. In LNEMS 177. Springer, 109--127.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hart, P., Nilsson, N., and Raphael, B. 1968. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybernet. 2, 100--107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Loui, R. P. 1983. Optimal paths in graphs with stochastic or multidimensional weights. Comm. ACM 26, 9 (Sept.), 670--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mahanti, A., and Ray, K. 1988. Network search algorithms with modifiable heuristics. In Search in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 200--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mandow, L., and Pérez de la Cruz, J. L. 2003. Multicriteria heuristic search. Europ. J. Operat. Res. 150, 253--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Mandow, L., and Pérez de la Cruz, J. L. 2005. A new approach to multiobjective A* search. In Proceedings of the XIX International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'05). 218--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mandow, L., and Pérez de la Cruz, J. L. 2006. Comparison of heuristics in multiobjective A* search. In CAEPIA'05. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4177. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 180--189. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mandow, L., and Pérez de la Cruz, J. L. 2009. A memory-efficient search strategy for multiobjective shortest path problems. In KI'2009: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5803. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mérõ, L. 1984. A heuristic search algorithm with modifiable estimate. Artif. Intell. 23, 1, 13--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Pearl, J. 1984. Heuristics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Perny, P., and Spanjaard, O. 2002. On preference-based search in state space graphs. In Proceedings of the 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press, 751--756. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Perny, P., and Spanjaard, O. 2005. A preference-based approach to spanning trees and shortest paths problems. Europ. J. Operat. Res. 162, 584--601.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Refanidis, I., and Vlahavas, I. 2003. Multiobjective heuristic state-space search. Artif. Intell. 145, 1--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Stewart, B. S., and White, C. C. 1991. Multiobjective A*. J. ACM 38, 4, 775--814. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multiobjective A* search with consistent heuristics

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Journal of the ACM
        Journal of the ACM  Volume 57, Issue 5
        June 2010
        126 pages
        ISSN:0004-5411
        EISSN:1557-735X
        DOI:10.1145/1754399
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Revised: 1 February 2010
        • Accepted: 1 February 2010
        • Published: 25 June 2008
        • Received: 1 March 2006
        Published in jacm Volume 57, Issue 5

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader