ABSTRACT
Much time is lost, in organizations, in the handling of unknown exceptions because organizational models are not current or coherent with reality and there is a lack of concepts and methods in organizational engineering (OE), for a continuous and timely update of models of organizational reality. To address these problems, a renowned methodology for OE -- DEMO (Design and Engineering Methodology for Organizations) and its underlying theory are improved and extended enabling a precise and integrated modeling of three aspects that we consider to be part of the function perspective of an organization: (1) viability -- specification of vital norms of operation that ensure the viability of the organization, dysfunctions and their causing exceptions, (2) change -- specification of the organizational engineering processes responsible for Generation, Operation and Discontinuation of organizational artifacts (OAs) -- for example, business rules or organizational actors -- in order to solve dysfunctions and (3) architecture -- specification of design rules that guide the referred engineering processes, restricting the "shape" of their end result -- OAs.
- Applegate L. M., McFarlan F. W. & McKenney J. L., Corporate Information Systems Management: Text and Cases, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dietz J. L. G., Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christensen W. D. & Bickhard M. H., The Process Dynamics of Normative Function, The Monist, Vol. 85, 2002, 3--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Axelrod R. & Cohen M. D., Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier, Basic Books, 2001.Google Scholar
- Bickhard M. H., Error dynamics: the dynamic emergence of error avoidance and error vicariants, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 13, 2001, 199--209.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saastamoinen H. & White G. M., On handling exceptions, Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems, ACM, 1995, 302--310. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mourão H., Supporting effective unexpected exceptions handling in workflow management systems within organizational contexts, Science Faculty of Lisbon University, 2007.Google Scholar
- Tribolet J., Organizações, Pessoas, Processos e Conhecimento: da Reificação do Ser Humano como Componente do Conhecimento à "Consciência de Si" Organizacional {Organizations, People, Processes and Knowledge: from the reification of the human being as components of knowledge to the knowledge of organizational self}, Sistemas de Informação Organizacionais, Lisbon, Portugal, Sílabo Editora, 2005.Google Scholar
- Magalhães R., Zacarias M. & Tribolet J., Making Sense of Enterprise Architectures as Tools of Organizational Self-Awareness (OSA), Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2007), June, Vol. 6, 2007, 61--70.Google Scholar
- Zacarias M., Magalhães R., Caetano A., Pinto H. S. & Tribolet J., Towards Organizational Self-Awareness: An Initial Architecture and Ontology, Handbook of Ontologies for Business Interaction, Information Science Reference, 2007, 101--121.Google Scholar
- Magalhães R. & Silva A. R., Organizational Design and Engineering (ODE) - ODE White paper - Version 1, 2009.Google Scholar
- Casati F. & Pozzi G., Modeling exceptional behaviors in commercial workflow management systems, Proceedings of the Fourth CoopIS - International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, 1999, 127--138. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dietz J. L. G. & Albani A., Basic notions regarding business processes and supporting information systems, Requirements Engineering, Vol. 10, 2005, 175--183. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Op' t Land M., Applying Architecture and Ontology to the Splitting and Allying of Enterprises, TU Delft, 2008.Google Scholar
- Dietz J. L. G., Architecture - Building strategy into design, Academic Service - Sdu Uitgevers bv, 2008.Google Scholar
- Dietz J. L. G., On the Nature of Business Rules, Advances in Enterprise Engineering I, 2008, 1--15.Google Scholar
- Dietz J. L., A World Ontology Specification Language, On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: OTM Workshops, 2005, 688--699. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dietz J. L. G., Demo-3 specification (forthcoming, in www.demo.nl), 2009.Google Scholar
- Dietz J. L. G., Demo meta model specification (forthcoming, in www.demo.nl), 2009.Google Scholar
- Schneier C. E., Beatty R. W. & Russell C. J., The Training and Development Sourcebook, Human Resource Development Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Organizational Downsizing: A Convergence and Reorientation Framework
Organizational downsizing is becoming pervasive as a characteristic of modern organizations, yet little scholarly literature has addressed the processes and outcomes associated with this phenomenon at the organizational level. Downsizing has often ...
Organizational Downsizing: A Convergence and Reorientation Framework
Organizational downsizing is becoming pervasive as a characteristic of modern organizations, yet little scholarly literature has addressed the processes and outcomes associated with this phenomenon at the organizational level. Downsizing has often ...
Organizational Downsizing: A Convergence and Reorientation Framework
Organizational downsizing is becoming pervasive as a characteristic of modern organizations, yet little scholarly literature has addressed the processes and outcomes associated with this phenomenon at the organizational level. Downsizing has often ...
Comments