skip to main content
10.1145/1774088.1774118acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards a GOD-theory for organizational engineering: continuously modeling the continuous (re)generation, operation and deletion of the enterprise

Published:22 March 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Much time is lost, in organizations, in the handling of unknown exceptions because organizational models are not current or coherent with reality and there is a lack of concepts and methods in organizational engineering (OE), for a continuous and timely update of models of organizational reality. To address these problems, a renowned methodology for OE -- DEMO (Design and Engineering Methodology for Organizations) and its underlying theory are improved and extended enabling a precise and integrated modeling of three aspects that we consider to be part of the function perspective of an organization: (1) viability -- specification of vital norms of operation that ensure the viability of the organization, dysfunctions and their causing exceptions, (2) change -- specification of the organizational engineering processes responsible for Generation, Operation and Discontinuation of organizational artifacts (OAs) -- for example, business rules or organizational actors -- in order to solve dysfunctions and (3) architecture -- specification of design rules that guide the referred engineering processes, restricting the "shape" of their end result -- OAs.

References

  1. Applegate L. M., McFarlan F. W. & McKenney J. L., Corporate Information Systems Management: Text and Cases, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dietz J. L. G., Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology, Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Christensen W. D. & Bickhard M. H., The Process Dynamics of Normative Function, The Monist, Vol. 85, 2002, 3--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Axelrod R. & Cohen M. D., Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier, Basic Books, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickhard M. H., Error dynamics: the dynamic emergence of error avoidance and error vicariants, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 13, 2001, 199--209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Saastamoinen H. & White G. M., On handling exceptions, Proceedings of conference on Organizational computing systems, ACM, 1995, 302--310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mourão H., Supporting effective unexpected exceptions handling in workflow management systems within organizational contexts, Science Faculty of Lisbon University, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tribolet J., Organizações, Pessoas, Processos e Conhecimento: da Reificação do Ser Humano como Componente do Conhecimento à "Consciência de Si" Organizacional {Organizations, People, Processes and Knowledge: from the reification of the human being as components of knowledge to the knowledge of organizational self}, Sistemas de Informação Organizacionais, Lisbon, Portugal, Sílabo Editora, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Magalhães R., Zacarias M. & Tribolet J., Making Sense of Enterprise Architectures as Tools of Organizational Self-Awareness (OSA), Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2007), June, Vol. 6, 2007, 61--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zacarias M., Magalhães R., Caetano A., Pinto H. S. & Tribolet J., Towards Organizational Self-Awareness: An Initial Architecture and Ontology, Handbook of Ontologies for Business Interaction, Information Science Reference, 2007, 101--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Magalhães R. & Silva A. R., Organizational Design and Engineering (ODE) - ODE White paper - Version 1, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Casati F. & Pozzi G., Modeling exceptional behaviors in commercial workflow management systems, Proceedings of the Fourth CoopIS - International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems, 1999, 127--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dietz J. L. G. & Albani A., Basic notions regarding business processes and supporting information systems, Requirements Engineering, Vol. 10, 2005, 175--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Op' t Land M., Applying Architecture and Ontology to the Splitting and Allying of Enterprises, TU Delft, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietz J. L. G., Architecture - Building strategy into design, Academic Service - Sdu Uitgevers bv, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dietz J. L. G., On the Nature of Business Rules, Advances in Enterprise Engineering I, 2008, 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietz J. L., A World Ontology Specification Language, On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: OTM Workshops, 2005, 688--699. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dietz J. L. G., Demo-3 specification (forthcoming, in www.demo.nl), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Dietz J. L. G., Demo meta model specification (forthcoming, in www.demo.nl), 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneier C. E., Beatty R. W. & Russell C. J., The Training and Development Sourcebook, Human Resource Development Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
    March 2010
    2712 pages
    ISBN:9781605586397
    DOI:10.1145/1774088

    Copyright © 2010 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 March 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    SAC '10 Paper Acceptance Rate364of1,353submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader