skip to main content
10.1145/1774088.1774158acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

RTTM: real-time transactional memory

Published:22 March 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hardware transactional memory is a promising synchronization technology for chip-multiprocessors. It simplifies programming of concurrent applications and allows for higher concurrency than lock based synchronization. Standard transactional memory is optimized for average case throughput, but for real-time systems we are interested in worst-case execution times. We propose real-time transactional memory (RTTM) as a time-predictable synchronization solution for chip-multiprocessors in real-time systems. We define the hardware for time-predictable transactions and provide a bound for the maximum transaction retries. The proposed RTTM is evaluated with a simulation of a Java chip-multiprocessor.

References

  1. WALA - T.J. Watson Libraries for Analysis. http://wala.sourceforge.net/, 2008. Version 1.2.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Alt, C. Ferdinand, F. Martin, and R. Wilhelm. Cache behavior prediction by abstract interpretation. In SAS '96: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Static Analysis, pages 52--66. Springer-Verlag, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Anderson, S. Ramamurthy, M. Moir, and K. Jeffay. Lock-free transactions for real-time systems. In Real-Time Database Systems: Issues and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. G. Bollella, J. Gosling, B. Brosgol, P. Dibble, S. Furr, and M. Turnbull. The Real-Time Specification for Java. Addison-Wesley, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. Hammond, B. D. Carlstrom, V. Wong, B. Hertzberg, M. K. Chen, C. Kozyrakis, and K. Olukotun. Programming with transactional coherence and consistency (TCC). In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS 2004), pages 1--13, Boston, MA, USA, October 2004. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Hammond, V. Wong, M. Chen, B. D. Carlstrom, J. D. Davis, B. Hertzberg, M. K. Prabhu, H. Wijaya, C. Kozyrakis, and K. Olukotun. Transactional memory coherence and consistency. In ISCA '04: Proceedings of the 31st annual international symposium on Computer architecture, page 102, Washington, DC, USA, 2004. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. Harris and K. Fraser. Language support for lightweight transactions. In Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA'03), pages 388--402, Seattle, Washington, Nov. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Herlihy, J. Eliot, and B. Moss. Transactional memory: Architectural support for lock-free data structures. In Computer Architecture, 1993. Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Symposium on, pages 289--300, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Herlihy, V. Luchangco, M. Moir, and W. Scherer. Software transactional memory for dynamic-sized data structures. In ACM Conference on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 92--101, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Herlihy and N. Shavit. The Art of Multiprocessor Programming. Morgan Kaufman, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. Knight. An architecture for mostly functional languages. In LFP '86: Proceedings of the 1986 ACM conference on LISP and functional programming, pages 105--112, New York, NY, USA, 1986. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Manson, J. Baker, A. Cunei, S. Jagannathan, M. Prochazka, B. Xin, and J. Vitek. Preemptible atomic regions for real-time java. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS'05), pages 62--71, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 2005. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Milanova, A. Rountev, and B. G. Ryder. Parameterized object sensitivity for points-to analysis for java. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 14(1):1--41, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. Naik, A. Aiken, and J. Whaley. Effective static race detection for java. In PLDI '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 308--319. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Pitter and M. Schoeberl. A real-time Java chip-multiprocessor. Trans. on Embedded Computing Sys., accepted for publication 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Saha, A.-R. Adl-Tabatabai, and Q. Jacobson. Architectural support for software transactional memory. In MICRO 39: Proceedings of the 39th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture, pages 185--196, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. M. Schoeberl. A Java processor architecture for embedded real-time systems. Journal of Systems Architecture, 54/1--2:265--286, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Schoeberl. Time-predictable computer architecture. EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems, vol. 2009, Article ID 758480:17 pages, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. M. Schoeberl, B. Thomsen, and L. L. Tomsen. Towards transactional memory for real-time systems. Research Report 19/2009, Institute of Computer Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Treitlstr. 1--3/182-1, 1040 Vienna, Austria, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Sharp. Real-time distributed object computing: Ready for mission-critical embedded system applications. In Proceeding of the Third International Symposium on Distribtued-Objects and Applications (DOA'01), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. N. Shavit and D. Touitou. Software transactional memory. Distributed Computing, 10(2):99--116, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. M. Sridharan and R. Bodík. Refinement-based context-sensitive points-to analysis for Java. In PLDI '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, pages 387--400. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. RTTM: real-time transactional memory

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2010
        2712 pages
        ISBN:9781605586397
        DOI:10.1145/1774088

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 March 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SAC '10 Paper Acceptance Rate364of1,353submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader