skip to main content
10.1145/1774088.1774291acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reparameterization based consistent graph-structured linear programs

Published:22 March 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

A class of Maximum A Posteriori(MAP) formulations built on various graph models are of great interests for both theoretical and practical applications. Recent advances in this field have extended the connections between the linear program (LP) relaxation and various tree-reweighted message passing algorithms. At both sides, many algorithms and their optimality certificates are proved, provided no conflict exists between the node marginal maximum and the corresponding edge marginal maximum. However, these conflicts are usually inevitable for general non-trivial Markov random fields (MRFs). Our work is aimed at reducing such conflicts by reparameterizing the original energy distributions in pairwise Markov random field. All node potentials will be decomposed and attached to local edges according to their local graph structures. And thus, only edge marginals are needed in our linear program relaxation, and the node marginals are only used to exchange information among different parts of the graph. We incorporated this consistent graph-structured reparameterization into some latest LP optimality guaranteed proximal solvers, and the resulted algorithms outperform the original ones in convergence rate and also have a better behavior to converge to MAP optimality monotonously even for some highly noisy MRFs.

References

  1. Bertsekas, D. P. Nonlinear programming. Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertsimas, D., & Tsitsikilis, J. Introduction to linear optimization. Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Boyd, S., & L. Vandenberghe, L. Convex optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Freeman, W. T., & Weiss Y. On the optimality of solutions of the max-product belief propagation algorithm in arbitrary graphs. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, 47:736--744, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hazan, T., & Shashua, A. Convergent message-passing algorithms for inference over general graphs with convex free energy. In The 24th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), Helsinki, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Johnson, J. K., Malioutov D. M., Willsky A. S. Lagrangian relaxation for MAP estimation in graphical models. In Proc. 45th Allerton Conf. Comm. Cont. Comp., Urbana-Champaign, IL, September 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kolmogorov, V. Convergent tree-reweighted message-passing for energy minimization. In International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, January 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kumar, P., Torr, P. H. S., Zisserman A. Solving markov random fields using second order cone programming. IEEE Conference of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lauritzen, S. L. Graphical Models. Oxford University Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ravikumar, P., Agarwal, A., Wainwright, M. J. Message-passing for graph-structured linear programs: proximal projections, convergence and rounding schemes. ICML 2008: 800--807. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Schlesinger, M. I. Syntactic analysis of two-dimensional visual signals in noisy conditions. Kibernetika. v4. 113--130, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Schlesinger, M. I. Mathematical tools for image processing. Kiev: Nauk. dumka, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Schlesinger, M. I., & Flach, B. Some solvable subclass of structural recognition problems. In Czech Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sontag, D., & Jaakkola T. New outer bounds on the marginal polytope. ICML07.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wainwright, M. J., & Jordan M. I. Graphical models, exponential families, and variational inference. Technical report, UC Berkeley, Department of Statistics, No. 649, September 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wainwright, M. J., Jaakkola, T. S., Willsky, A. S. Tree-based reparameterization framework for analysis of sum-product and related algorithms. IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, 49(5):1120--1146, May 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wainwright, M. J., Jaakkola, T. S., Willsky, A. S. Exact MAP estimates via agreement on (hyper)trees: Linear programming and message-passing. IEEE Trans. Information Theory, 51(11):3697--3717, November 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Weiss, Y., Yanover, C., Meltzer T. Map estimation, linear programming and belief propagation with convex free energies. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhou, H. Long range frustration in a spin-glass model of the vertex cover problem. Physical Review Letters 94: 217203, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Reparameterization based consistent graph-structured linear programs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '10: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2010
        2712 pages
        ISBN:9781605586397
        DOI:10.1145/1774088

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 March 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SAC '10 Paper Acceptance Rate364of1,353submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader