Hossam Ali-Hassan
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
With advances in the areas of telecommunications, computing and miniaturization of computers, the use of mobile technology is becoming prevalent within organizations. Consequently, a shift towards a nomadic computing environment, capable of supporting workers anywhere and anytime, is commonly observed. While many of the issues associated with such environments are technological in nature, this paper focuses on the social aspect of the shift to a nomadic computing environment, and examines its impact of employees' ability to effectively collaborate with one another. Studying changes at the individual level, we argue that an increase in workers' social mobility, brought upon by the move to a nomadic computing environment, is likely to have a negative effect on their social capital. Social capital has been shown to positively impact collaboration in various settings, including the workplace. We further argue that the above negative effect is contingent upon the type of mobile technology used by nomadic workers. The paper concludes with suggestions for model extensions and avenues for future research.
- Adler, P. S., S. W. Kwon. 2002. Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review 27(1) 17--40.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Arling, P., M. Submarani. 2005. Being There Versus Being Wired: The Effect of Colocation on Social Capital in Distributed Teams Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems.Google Scholar
- Baker, W. E. 1990. Market Networks and Corporate Behavior. American Journal of Sociology 96(3) 589.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Baskerville, R., J. Nandhakumar. 2007. Activating and Perpetuating Virtual Teams: Now That We're Mobile, Where Do We Go? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 50(1) 17--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Borgatti, S. P. 2005. Centrality and network flow. Social Networks 27(1) 55--71.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Borgatti, S. P., R. Cross. 2003. A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks. Management Science 49(4) 432--445. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Borgatti, S. P., C. Jones, M. G. Everett. 1998. Network Measures of Social Capital. Connections 21(2) 36.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P., ed. 1985. The forms of capital. Greenwood, New York.Google Scholar
- Boyd, D. M., N. B. Ellison. 2008. Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 210--230.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brass, D. J. 1995. A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management 13 39--79.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. 1997. The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(2) 339--365.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press., New York.Google Scholar
- Chatman, J. A. 1991. Matching People and Organizations: Selection and Socialization in Public Accounting Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(3) 459--484.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, L., R. Nath. 2005. Nomadic Culture: Cultural Support for Working Anytime, Anywhere. Information Systems Management 22(4) 56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chiu, C. M., M. H. Hsu, E. T. G. Wang. 2006. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42(3) 1872--1888. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chou, T. C., J. R. Chen, S. L. Pan. 2006. The impacts of social capital on information technology outsourcing decisions: A case study of a Taiwanese high-tech firm. International Journal of Information Management 26(3) 249--256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94(S95).Google Scholar
- Collins, J. D., M. A. Hitt. 2006. Leveraging tacit knowledge in alliances: The importance of using relational capabilities to build and leverage relational capital. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management 23(3) 147--167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cooke, P. 2007. Social capital, embeddedness, and market interactions: An analysis of firm performance in UK regions. Review of Social Economy 65(1) 79--106.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coutu, D. L. 1998. Organization: Trust in virtual teams. Harvard Business Review 76(3) 20.Google Scholar
- Cross, R., A. Parker, L. Prusak, S. P. Borgatti. 2001. Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks. Organizational Dynamics 30(2) 100--120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daft, R. L., R. H. Lengel. 1986. Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science 32(5) 554--571.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daft, R. L., R. H. Lengel, L. K. Trevino. 1987. Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 11(3) 354--366.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dennis, A. R., R. M. Fuller. 2008. Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly 32(3) 575--600. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dennis, A. R., S. T. Kinney. 1998. Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality. Information Systems Research 9(3) 256--274. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dennis, A. R., J. S. Valacich. 1999. Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dwyer, C., S. Hiltz, K. Passerini. 2007. Trust and Privacy Concern Within Social Networking Sites: A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace. Proceedings of the thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Keystone, Colorado.Google Scholar
- Ellison, N. B., C. Lampe, C. Steinfield. 2009. Social Network Sites and Society: Current Trends and Future Possibilities. Interactions 16(1) 6--9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ellison, N. B., C. Steinfield, C. Lampe. 2007. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends": Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications 12 1143--1168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fallman, D. 2005. From Freedom to Involvement: On the Rhetoric of Mobility in HCI Research. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press., New York.Google Scholar
- Ghoshal, S., H. Korine, G. Szulanski. 1994. Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations. Management Science 40(1) 96--110.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78(6) 1360--1380.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Granovetter, M. S. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology 91(3) 481--510.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guerrero, L. A., S. F. Ochoa, J. A. Pino, C. A. Collazos. 2006. Selecting Computing Devices to Support Mobile Collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation 15 243--271.Google Scholar
- Gulati, R. 1995. Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38(1) 85--112.Google Scholar
- Hansen, M. T. 1999. The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(1) 82.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haythornthwaite, C. 2002. Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media. Information Society 18(5) 385--401.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hertel, G., S. Geister, U. Konradt. 2005. Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review 15(1) 69--95.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hollingshead, A. B. 2001. Cognitive Interdependence and Convergent Expectations in Transactive Memory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 81(6) 1080--1089.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Huang, S., G. DeSanctis. 2005. Mobilizing Informational Social Capital in Cyber Space: Online Social Network Structural Properties and Knowledge Sharing Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Conference on Information Systems, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
- Humphreys, L. 2007. Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of Dodgeball. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1) 341--360.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hung, Y. T. C., A. R. Dennis, L. Robert. 2004. Trust in virtual teams: toward an integrative model of trust formation. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huysman, M., V. Wulf. 2006. IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis. Journal of Information Technology 21(1) 40--51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., K. Knoll, D. E. Leidner. 1998. Is Anybody Out There? Journal of Management Information Systems 14(4) 29--64. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., K. R. Lang. 2005. Managing the Paradoxes of Mobile Technology. Information Systems Management 22(4) 7--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., D. E. Leidner. 1999. Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Organization Science 10(6) 791. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., T. R. Shaw, D. S. Staples. 2004. Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Information Systems Research 15(3) 250--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kakihara, M., C. Sorensen. 2004. Practicing mobile professional work: tales of locational, operational, and interactional mobility. Info 6(3) 180--187.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kleinrock, L. 2001. Breaking Loose. Communications of the ACM 44(9) 41--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Knack, S., P. Keefer. 1997. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4) 1251.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Krackhardt, D., ed. 1992. The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
- Lewis, K. 2003. Measuring Transactive Memory Systems in the Field: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4) 587--604.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lewis, K. 2004. Knowledge and Performance in Knowledge-Worker Teams: A Longitudinal Study of Transactive Memory Systems. Management Science 50(11) 1519--1533. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lopez, M. D., E. J. Brown, R. Muhlhausen. 2007. Mobility Becomes An Integral Part Of Firms' Network Strategy Forrester Research Report.Google Scholar
- Lyytinen, K., Y. Yoo. 2002. Research Commentary: The Next Wave of Nomadic Computing. Information Systems Research 13(4) 377--388. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marsden, P. V., K. E. Campbell. 1984. Measuring Tie Strength. Social Forces 63(2) 482--501.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martins, L. L., L. L. Gilson, M. T. Maynard. 2004. Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? Journal of Management 30(6) 805--835.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maznevski, M. L., K. M. Chudoba. 2000. Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness. Organization Science 11(5) 473--492. Google ScholarDigital Library
- McFadyen, M. A., A. A. Cannella Jr. 2004. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal 47(5) 735--746.Google Scholar
- McMains, A. 2007. Social Networks Key Way To Target Gen-Mobile. Adweek 48(39) 9.Google Scholar
- Murray, S. R., J. Peyrefitte. 2007. Knowledge Type and Communication Media Choice in the Knowledge Transfer Process. Journal of Managerial Issues 19(1) 111--133.Google Scholar
- Nahapiet, J., S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2) 242--266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Otondo, R. F., J. R. Van Scotter, D. G. Allen, P. Palvia. 2008. The complexity of richness: Media, message, and communication outcomes. Information & Management 45(1) 21--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Partanen, J., K. Moller, M. Westerlund, R. Rajala, A. Rajala. 2008. Social capital in the growth of science-and-technology-based SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management 5 513--522.Google Scholar
- Patnayakuni, R., A. Rai, N. Seth. 2006. Relational Antecedents of Information Flow Integration for Supply Chain Coordination. Journal of Management Information Systems 23(1) 13--49. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pearse, J. 2008. Mobile is a natural fit for social networking. New Media Age 12--12.Google Scholar
- Perry-Smith, J. E. 2006. Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal 49(1) 85--101.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pinsonneault, A., O. Caya. 2005. Virtual Teams: What We Know and What We Don't Know. International Journal of Electronic Collaboration 1(3) 1--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Polanyi, M. 1966. The tacit dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
- Powell, A., G. Piccoli, B. Ives. 2004. Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 35(1). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Prasopoulou, E., A. Pouloudi, N. Panteli. 2006. Enacting new temporal boundaries: the role of mobile phones. European Journal of Information Systems 15(3) 277--284.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Putnam, R. D. 1995. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6(1) 65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
- Reagans, R., B. McEvily. 2003. Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2) 240--267.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rosen, P., P. Sherman. 2006. Hedonic Information Systems: Acceptance of Social Networking Websites Proceedings of the Twelfth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Acapulco, Mexico.Google Scholar
- Rulke, D. L., D. Rau. 2000. Investigating the Encoding Process of Transactive Memory Development in Group Training. Group & Organization Management 25(4) 373.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scheepers, H., P. Steele. 2002. The hidden impact of mobile information systems: a case study of social interaction. Proceedeings of the Thirteenth Australasian Conference on Information Systems.Google Scholar
- Schein, E. H. 1990. Organizational Culture. American Psychologist 45(2) 109--119.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schultze, U., W. J. Orlikowski. 2004. A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies. Information Systems Research 15(1) 87--106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Smith, H. A., J. D. McKeen. 2007. Developments in Practice XXVI: Social Networks: Knowledge Management's "Killer App"? Communications of the Association for Information Systems 19 35.Google Scholar
- Staples, D. S., J. Webster. 2007. Exploring Traditional and Virtual Team Members' "Best Practices" A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective. Small Group Research 38(1) 60--97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sudan, S. K., S. D. Drake. 2008. Facing the challenges and the business value of effectively managing mobile devices. IDC white paper.Google Scholar
- Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice Within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 27--43.Google Scholar
- Tsai, W., S. Ghoshal. 1998. Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal 41(4) 464--476.Google Scholar
- Urry, J. 2002. Mobility and Proximity. Sociology 36(2) 255--274.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Uzzi, B. 1996. The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociological Review 61(4) 674--698.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Uzzi, B. 1997. Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1) 37--69.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van Maanen, J., E. H. Schein, eds. 1979. Toward a theory of organizational socialization. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar
- Walther, J. B., B. Van DerHeide, S. Y. Kim, D. Westerman, S. T. Tong. 2008. The Role of Friends' Appearance and Behavior on Evaluations of Individuals on Facebook: Are We Known by the Company We Keep? Human Communication Research 34(1) 28--49.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wasko, M., S. Faraj. 2005. Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice. MIS Quarterly 29(1) 35--57. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wegner, D. M., ed. 1986. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
- Wellman, B., J. Salaff, D. Dimitrova, L. Garton, M. Gulia, C. Haythornthwaite. 1996. Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology 22 213--238.Google Scholar
- Wilson, J. M., S. G. Straus, B. McEvily. 2006. All in due time: The development of trust in computer-Mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 99(1) 16--33.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Woolcock, M., D. Narayan. 2000. Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy. World Bank Research Observer 15(2) 225.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yang, K. 2007. Individual Social Capital and Its Measurement in Social Surveys. Survey Research Methods 1(1) 19--27.Google Scholar
- Yang, S. 2005. Relationships among Mobile Data Service, Mobility and Social Capital: A Conceptual Model. Proceedings of the sixteenth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
- Yuan, L., R. Buckman. 2006. Social Networking Goes Mobile; MySpace, Facebook Strike Deals With Cell Companies; A New Set of Safety Concerns. Wall Street Journal, D1.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Mobile collaboration: exploring the role of social capital
Recommendations
The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being
Using a two-wave panel in Hong Kong, this study examines how different uses of mobile social media contribute to individuals' social capital and psychological well-being. Findings showed that communicative use and self-disclosure on mobile social media ...
Ties that work
People connect with their coworkers on social networking sites not only for personal but also for professional purposes. Although much has been done to understand the use of enterprise social networking sites (ESNSs), little is known about the impact of ...
Social network site use, mobile personal talk and social capital among teenagers
Mobile personal talk has a positive relationship with network capital among teens.SNS adoption and mobile personal talk jointly predict teens' civic participation.Different SNS activities have different relationships with social capital.Mobile talk ...
Comments