skip to main content
10.1145/1807128.1807160acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Making cloud intermediate data fault-tolerant

Authors Info & Claims
Published:10 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Parallel dataflow programs generate enormous amounts of distributed data that are short-lived, yet are critical for completion of the job and for good run-time performance. We call this class of data as intermediate data. This paper is the first to address intermediate data as a first-class citizen, specifically targeting and minimizing the effect of run-time server failures on the availability of intermediate data, and thus on performance metrics such as job completion time. We propose new design techniques for a new storage system called ISS (Intermediate Storage System), implement these techniques within Hadoop, and experimentally evaluate the resulting system. Under no failure, the performance of Hadoop augmented with ISS (i.e., job completion time) turns out to be comparable to base Hadoop. Under a failure, Hadoop with ISS outperforms base Hadoop and incurs up to 18% overhead compared to base no-failure Hadoop, depending on the testbed setup.

References

  1. M. Abd-El-Malek, W. V. C. II, C. Cranor, G. R. Ganger, J. Hendricks, A. J. Klosterman, M. Mesnier, M. Prasad, B. Salmon, R. R. Sambasivan, S. Sinnamohideen, J. D. Strunk, E. Thereska, M. Wachs, and J. J. Wylie. Ursa Minor: Versatile Cluster-based Storage. In Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST '05), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. M. K. Aguilera, A. Merchant, M. A. Shah, A. Veitch, and C. Karamanolis. Sinfonia: A New Paradigm for Building Scalable Distributed Systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Operating systems principles (SOSP), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. G. Baker, J. H. Hartman, M. D. Kupfer, K. W. Shirriff, and J. K. Ousterhout. Measurements of a Distributed File System. SIGOPS Operating Systems Review (OSR), 25(5), 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. A. Bernstein and N. Goodman. The failure and recovery problem for replicated databases. In PODC '83: Proceedings of the second annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, 1983. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Burrows. The Chubby Lock Service for Loosely-Coupled Distributed Systems. In Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cassandra: A Structured Storage System on a P2P Network. http://code.google.com/p/the-cassandraproject.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. Chang, J. Dean, S. Ghemawat, W. C. Hsieh, D. A. Wallach, M. Burrows, T. Chandra, A. Fikes, and R. E. Gruber. Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data. In Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Cipar, M. D. Corner, and E. D. Berger. TFS: a Transparent File System for Contributory Storage. In Proceedings of the 5th USENIX conference on File and Storage Technologies (FAST '07), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Cisco. Cisco Data Center Infrastructure 2.5 Design Guide. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/Data_Center/DC_Infra2_5/DCI_SRND.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. B. F. Cooper, R. Ramakrishnan, U. Srivastava, A. Silberstein, P. Bohannon, H.-A. Jacobsen, N. Puz, D. Weaver, and R. Yerneni. PNUTS: Yahoo!'s Hosted Data Serving Platform. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Dean. Software Engineering Advice from Building Large-Scale Distributed Systems. http://research.google.com/people/jeff/stanford-295-talk.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Dean. Experiences with MapReduce, an Abstraction for Large-Scale Computation. In Keynote I: PACT, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Dean and S. Ghemawat. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. In Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. G. Decandia, D. Hastorun, M. Jampani, G. Kakulapati, A. Lakshman, A. Pilchin, S. Sivasubramanian, P. Vosshall, and W. Vogels. Dynamo: Amazon's Highly Available Key-Value Store. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Operating systems principles (SOSP), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Dryad Project Page at MSR. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/Dryad/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Facebook. Hive. http://hadoop.apache.org/hive/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Ghemawat, H. Gobioff, and S.-T. Leung. The Google File System. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating systems principles (SOSP), 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. D. Gribble, E. A. Brewer, J. M. Hellerstein, and D. Culler. Scalable, Distributed Data Structures for Internet Service Construction. In Proceedings of the 4th USENIX Symposium on Opearting Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '00), 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hadoop Presentations. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HadoopPresentations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. HBase. http://hadoop.apache.org/hbase.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. HDFS (Hadoop Distributed File System). http://hadoop.apache.org/core/docs/r0.20.0/hdfs_user_guide.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. P. Herlihy and J. M. Wing. Linearizability: a correctness condition for concurrent objects. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 12(3):463--492, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. H. Howard. An Overview of the Andrew File System. In Proceedings of the Annual USENIX Winter Technical Conference, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Isard, M. Budiu, Y. Yu, A. Birrell, and D. Fetterly. Dryad: Distributed Data-Parallel Programs From Sequential Building Blocks. In Proceedings of the 2007 EuroSys Conference (EuroSys), 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Y. Ko, I. Hoque, B. Cho, and I. Gupta. On Availability of Intermediate Data in Cloud Computations. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOS), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Kuzmanovic and E. W. Knightly. TCP-LP: Low-Priority Service via End-Point Congestion Control. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 14(4):739--752, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Y. Kwon, M. Balazinska, and A. Greenberg. Fault-tolerant Stream Processing using a Distributed, Replicated File System. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB '08), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. J. MacCormick, N. Murphy, M. Najork, C. A. Thekkath, and L. Zhou. Boxwood: Abstractions as the Foundation for Storage Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 6th USENIX Symposium on Opearting Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI '04), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Sorting 1PB with MapReduce. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/sorting-1pb-with-mapreduce.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Network File System (NFS) version 4 Protocol. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. C. Olston, B. Reed, U. Srivastava, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Pig Latin: A Not-So-Foreign Language for Data Processing. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data (SIGMOD), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Powered by Hadoop. http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/PoweredBy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Y. Saito, C. Karamanolis, M. Karlsson, and M. Mahalingam. Taming Aggressive Replication in the Pangaea Wide-Area File System. In Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Y. Saito and M. Shapiro. Optimistic Replication. ACM Computing Surveys, 37(1):42--81, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. D. B. Terry, M. M. Theimer, K. Petersen, A. J. Demers, M. J. Spreitzer, and C. H. Hauser. Managing Update Conflicts in Bayou, a Weakly Connected Replicated Storage System. In Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles (SOSP '95), 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. A. Venkataramani, R. Kokku, and M. Dahlin. TCP Nice: A Mechanism for Background Transfers. In Proceedings of the 5th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. W. Vogels. File System Usage in Windows NT 4.0. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles (SOSP), 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Making cloud intermediate data fault-tolerant

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SoCC '10: Proceedings of the 1st ACM symposium on Cloud computing
      June 2010
      264 pages
      ISBN:9781450300360
      DOI:10.1145/1807128

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 June 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate169of722submissions,23%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader