skip to main content
10.1145/1809777.1809801acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseuroitvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Time-evolution of IPTV recommender systems

Published:09 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we evaluate the performance of different collaborative filtering algorithms over time, where new users, new items, and new ratings are constantly added to the recommender dataset.

The analysis has been performed on the datasets collected by two IPTV providers. Both datasets have been implicitly collected by analyzing the pay-per-view movies purchased by the users over a period of several months. The first result of the paper outlines that item-based algorithms perform better with respect to SVD-based ones in the early stage of the cold-start problem. The second result shows that the accuracy of SVD-based algorithms, when using few latent factors, decreases with the time-evolution of the dataset. On the contrary, SVD-based algorithms, when used with a large-enough number of latent features, increase their accuracy with time and may outperform the item-based algorithms if the dataset does not present a long-tail behavior.

References

  1. J. F. Abreu, P. Almeida, R. Pinto, and V. Nobre. Implementation of social features over regular iptv stb. In "EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the seventh european conference on European interactive television conference", pages 29--32, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. In "Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on", 17(6):734--749, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. J. Ahn. A new similarity measure for collaborative filtering to alleviate the new user cold-starting problem. In "Inf. Sci.", 178(1):37--51, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Bennett and S. Lanning. The Netflix Prize. In "Proceedings of KDD Cup and Workshop", pages 3--6, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Campochiaro, R. Casatta, P. Cremonesi, and R. Turrin. Do metrics make recommender algorithms? In "IEEE Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA)", 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. O. Celma and P. Cano. From hits to niches? or how popular artists can bias music recommendation and discovery. Las Vegas, USA, August 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. O. Celma and P. Herrera. A new approach to evaluating novel recommendations. In "RecSys '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems", pages 179--186, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Cremonesi, E. Lentini, M. Matteucci, and R. Turrin. An evaluation methodology for recommender systems. In "4th Int. Conf. on Automated Solutions for Cross Media Content and Multi-channel Distribution", pages 224--231, Nov 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Cremonesi and R. Turrin. Analysis of cold-start recommendations in iptv systems. In "RecSys '09: Proceedings of the 2009 ACM conference on RecommenderSystems", pages 1--4. ACM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. De Pessemier, T. Deryckere, and L. Martens. Context aware recommendations for user-generated content on a social network site. In "EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the seventh european conference on European interactive television conference", pages 133--136, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Deshpande and G. Karypis. Item-based top-n recommendation algorithms. In "ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)", 22(1):143--177, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. W. Furnas, S. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Landauer, R. A. Harshman, L. A. Streeter, and K. E. Lochbaum. Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure. pages 465--480, New York, NY, USA, 1988. ACM Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Gunawardana and C. Meek. Tied boltzmann machines for cold start recommendations. In "RecSys '08: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems", pages 19--26, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Herlocker, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering". In "22nd ACM SIGIR Conf. on R&D in Information Retrieval", pages 230--237, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Herlocker, J. Konstan, L. Terveen, and J. Riedl. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems". In "ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)", 22(1):5--53, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. pages 241--250, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Z. Huang, H. Chen, and D. Zeng. Applying associative retrieval techniques to alleviate the sparsity problem in collaborative filtering. In "ACM Trans. Inf. Syst.", 22(1):116--142, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. Husbands, H. Simon, and C. Ding. On the use of singular value decomposition for text retrieval. Oct. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P. Lops, M. Degemmis, and G. Semeraro. Improving social filtering techniques through wordnet-based user profiles. In "UM '07: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on User Modeling", pages 268--277, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A.-T. Nguyen, N. Denos, and C. Berrut. Improving new user recommendations with rule-based induction on cold user data. In "RecSys '07: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM conference on Recommender systems", pages 121--128, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S.-T. Park, D. Pennock, O. Madani, N. Good, and D. DeCoste. Naïve filterbots for robust cold-start recommendations. In KDD '06: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining", pages 699--705, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Paterek. Improving regularized singular value decomposition for collaborative filtering. In "Proceedings of KDD Cup and Workshop", 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Reidl. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms". In "10th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web", pages 285--295, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Incremental singular value decomposition algorithms for highly scalable recommender systems". In "5th Int. Conf. on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT 2002)", pages 399--404, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. A. Schein, A. Popescul, L. Ungar, and D. Pennock. Generate models for cold-start recommendations. In "ACMSIGIR Workshop on RecommenderSystems.", 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Schein, A. Popescul, L. Ungar, and D. Pennock. Methods and metrics for cold-start recommendations. In "Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2002)", pages 253--260, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. G. Takács, I. Pilászy, B. Németh, and D. Tikk. Scalable collaborative filtering approaches for large recommender systems. In "J. Mach. Learn. Res.", 10:623--656, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. E. Vozalis and K. Margaritis. Analysis of recommender systems algorithms". In "Proc. of the 6th Hellenic European Conf. on Computer Mathematics and its Applications", 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Zaletelj, M. Savić", and M. Meža. Real-time viewer feedback in the itv production. In "EuroITV '09: Proceedings of the seventh european conference on European interactive television conference", pages 149--152, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Time-evolution of IPTV recommender systems

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              EuroITV '10: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video
              June 2010
              328 pages
              ISBN:9781605588315
              DOI:10.1145/1809777
              • Conference Chairs:
              • Petri Vuorimaa,
              • Pertti Naranen,
              • General Chair:
              • Artur Lugmayr,
              • Program Chairs:
              • Célia Quico,
              • Gunnar Harboe

              Copyright © 2010 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 9 June 2010

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate52of149submissions,35%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader