skip to main content
10.1145/1810543.1810608acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesidcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Gifts for intertwining with modern nature

Published:09 June 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Can we design tools and toys that encourage interaction with and intimate knowledge of the every day world? Inspired by Froebel's Gifts, we created a set of meta-manipulatives or "Modern Nature Gifts,"to help people explore their own local environments. Each gift comes out of the box "incomplete" and must be combined with some element of the environment to become meaningful. Like a magnifying glass, they are only interesting when applied to our world. However, the Modern Nature Gifts go one step beyond a magnifying glass because they directly suggest that you build and express yourself using your local landscape. You might see people engaged in activities like jumping up and down to draw a picture, hula-hooping to create music, or exploring a park to find unique sounds for a musical composition. We briefly cover fourrecent works and show how they exemplify Modern Nature Gifts: GlowDoodle, Drawdio, MmmTsss, and Twinkle.

References

  1. Burgen, Doris. New Technologies in Early Childhood, Partners in Play? In Saracho, O. N. and Spodek, B. Contemporary Perspectives on Science and Technology in Early Childhood Education. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Silver, J. S. (2009). Nature as interface: MacGyver'ing and Martha-Stewart'ing interactivity with trees, pencils, grandpa, even the kitchen sink. In Proceeding of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition (pp. 483--484). Berkeley, California, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V38bxZYq5VgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. http://www.froebelweb.org, retrieved April 29, 2009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (30th ed.). Continuum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Tolle, E. (2005). A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life's Purpose (roughcut.). Dutton Adult.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Papert, S. & Harel, I. Constructionism. Ablex. (1991)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, Carolyn Pope. Three Approaches from Europe: Waldorf, Montessori, and Reggio Emilia. Spring 2002, Volume 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Liedeloff, Jean. The Continuum Concept: In Search of Happiness Lost. Da Capo Press, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Piaget, J. (1980). The Constructivist approach. Geneva: Foundation Archives Jean Piaget.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Silver, J. (2008). Camera for the invisible. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children (pp. 173--174). Chicago, Illinois: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rosenbaum, E. (2009). Glowdoodle: a medium for expressive inquiry. In Proceeding of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition (pp. 469--470). Berkeley, California, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Silver, J. S., & Rosenbaum, E. (2010). Twinkle: programming with color. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction (pp. 383--384). Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. http://mmmtsss.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Gifts for intertwining with modern nature

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      Barrett Hazeltine

      As presented in this paper, gifts are learning tools and modern nature is the world around us, with the recognition that people live in different microclimates. Gifts allow us to actively engage modern nature, to be intertwined with it. The terms "explore," "build," and "express" are used to describe intertwining. Four gifts are described that make the following possible: painting a picture with either a flower, hands, or a Lego block; composing a song by drawing a score using markers on papers and playing it back by scanning; inventing musical instruments by using any sounds available and then combining these sounds; and creating music by moving your fingers over common devices-for example, a kitchen sink, a drawing, or a bicycle. Three of these gifts have been installed in museums and children have interacted with them. Descriptive Web sites show two of the gifts in action. The approach is imaginative, and using the gifts should be fun. Unfortunately, no analysis of what they actually accomplish is given. In summary, while this enjoyable read presents an intriguing idea, the significance is questionable. Online Computing Reviews Service

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IDC '10: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
        June 2010
        389 pages
        ISBN:9781605589510
        DOI:10.1145/1810543

        Copyright © 2010 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 9 June 2010

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate172of578submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader